Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable RB_EDGE interrupts"

[Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:51:18PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> This reverts commit 5ddc7bd43ccc ("mtd: atmel_nand: Support variable
> RB_EDGE interrupts")
> 
> Because for current SoCs, the RB_EDGE3(i.e. bit 27) of HSMC_SR
> register does not exist, the RB_EDGE0 (i.e. bit 24) is the ready/busy
> line edge status bit. It is a datasheet bug.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>
> ---
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt         |  2 +-
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c                      | 35 +++++-----------------
>  drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand_nfc.h                  |  3 +-
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index d53aba9..3e7ee99 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Optional properties:
>  
>  Nand Flash Controller(NFC) is an optional sub-node
>  Required properties:
> -- compatible : "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" or "atmel,sama5d4-nfc".
> +- compatible : "atmel,sama5d3-nfc".
>  - reg : should specify the address and size used for NFC command registers,
>          NFC registers and NFC SRAM. NFC SRAM address and size can be absent
>          if don't want to use it.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> index efc8ea2..68b9160 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c
[...]
>  static const struct of_device_id atmel_nand_nfc_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc", .data = &sama5d3_nfc_caps },
> -	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d4-nfc", .data = &sama5d4_nfc_caps },
> +	{ .compatible = "atmel,sama5d3-nfc" },

Hmm, wait. Didn't Rob and Alexandre suggest that we should *not* drop
the compatible property? We could have easily supported both here, and
just not listed any different capabilities. But I see that Nicholas took
the patch anyway, so I guess it's not a big deal...

>  	{ /* sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, atmel_nand_nfc_match);

Brian