All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: oom: deduplicate victim selection code for memcg and global oom
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:23:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160527172304.GD2531@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bbc7b70dae6ace0b8751e0140e878acfdfffd74.1464358556.git.vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:17:42PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> When selecting an oom victim, we use the same heuristic for both memory
> cgroup and global oom. The only difference is the scope of tasks to
> select the victim from. So we could just export an iterator over all
> memcg tasks and keep all oom related logic in oom_kill.c, but instead we
> duplicate pieces of it in memcontrol.c reusing some initially private
> functions of oom_kill.c in order to not duplicate all of it. That looks
> ugly and error prone, because any modification of select_bad_process
> should also be propagated to mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
> 
> Let's rework this as follows: keep all oom heuristic related code
> private to oom_kill.c and make oom_kill.c use exported memcg functions
> when it's really necessary (like in case of iterating over memcg tasks).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>

Cool work!

I'll do a full review after the rebase on top of Michal's stuff.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: oom: deduplicate victim selection code for memcg and global oom
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 13:23:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160527172304.GD2531@cmpxchg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bbc7b70dae6ace0b8751e0140e878acfdfffd74.1464358556.git.vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:17:42PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> When selecting an oom victim, we use the same heuristic for both memory
> cgroup and global oom. The only difference is the scope of tasks to
> select the victim from. So we could just export an iterator over all
> memcg tasks and keep all oom related logic in oom_kill.c, but instead we
> duplicate pieces of it in memcontrol.c reusing some initially private
> functions of oom_kill.c in order to not duplicate all of it. That looks
> ugly and error prone, because any modification of select_bad_process
> should also be propagated to mem_cgroup_out_of_memory.
> 
> Let's rework this as follows: keep all oom heuristic related code
> private to oom_kill.c and make oom_kill.c use exported memcg functions
> when it's really necessary (like in case of iterating over memcg tasks).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com>

Cool work!

I'll do a full review after the rebase on top of Michal's stuff.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-27 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-27 14:17 [PATCH 1/2] mm: oom: add memcg to oom_control Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:17 ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: oom: deduplicate victim selection code for memcg and global oom Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:17   ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:26   ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 14:26     ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 14:45     ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:45       ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-05-27 14:52       ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 14:52         ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 17:23   ` Johannes Weiner [this message]
2016-05-27 17:23     ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08  8:33   ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08  8:33     ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 11:18     ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 11:18       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 11:24       ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 11:24         ` Tetsuo Handa
2016-06-08 14:21       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 14:21         ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 13:52     ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-06-08 13:52       ` Vladimir Davydov
2016-06-08 14:46       ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 14:46         ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 14:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: oom: add memcg to oom_control Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 14:34   ` Michal Hocko
2016-05-27 17:20 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-05-27 17:20   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160527172304.GD2531@cmpxchg.org \
    --to=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vdavydov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.