All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] spl: dfu: add dfu support in SPL
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:55:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160531115526.1e8f4fc0@amdc2363> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6C6B28D4DC342643927BEAFCE8707BF67620F9F8@DBDE04.ent.ti.com>

Hi Ravi,

> Hi Lucasz
> 
> Thanks for active support.
> 
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > - Would it be hard to add SPL-DFU support also to BeagleBone
> >> >> >  Black(am335x) (BBB) board? I'm asking since BBB is far more 
> >> >> > pervasive than dra7x (and I might be able to cover SPL-DFU
> >> >> > easily with our new ptest (DFU) test suite).
> >> >> >   
> >> >> 
> >> >> It's possible to extend this for other platform, but SPL size
> >> >> would be 152k.
> >> 
> >> >That was my point to reduce the size as much as possible and only 
> >> >provide minimal functionality to fit the bill.
> >> 
> >> Since DFU is tighly coupled to u-boot infrastructure , the size
> >> will increase due to multiple dependencies to compile u-boot DFU
> >> source in SPL. Let me re-think on possibility and come back.
> 
> >If you would need any assistance, please let me know (I don't have
> >dra7x, but I do have Beagle Bone Black).
> 
> The current implementation of dfu (drivers/dfu/dfu.c) relies on
> environment modules (getenv,setenv), and hash algo methods. The
> mandatory modules for DFU includes USB(dwc3/musb), gadget,
> drivers/dfu, hash, environ modules. Added to this mmc/sf support,
> with filesystem fat/ext4 would definitely increase the size.
> 

I've double checked BBB SPL setup:

- SPL is the MLO (./common/spl/)
- Its size shall be less than 128 KiB
- It can reside on eMMC (fat partition, raw LBA offset), NAND or be sent
  via serial port.

I've build the am335x_boneblack_defconfig and MLO size is 75 KiB.

Please correct me, but it seems that the SPL-DFU support adds around
30 KiB to SPL binary size.

If yes, then even BBB's SPL can support DFU without any problems (105KiB
< 128 KiB).

I'm also wondering if we could even shrink the code more with
reusing or extending the code@./common/spl/spl_{ext|fat|mmc|sf,
etc}.c (in this way we avoid adding the whole fat, ext, sf "commands").

For more aggressive size reduction we could for example disable hash
algo checking and add ./common/spl/spl_dfu.c file with ordinary
functions and rid of the need to add the whole dfu command.


> I have tried minimal subset adding DFU-SF serial flash support alone
> in SPL, this itself increases SPL size to 30K+ (SPL size approx.
> 107KB for dra7x). 
> 
> But beagle bone IRAM would be around 64KB right? Definetly this will
> not fit.
> 
> Can we enable this feature for platform with minimum SRAM size of
> 160KB. So SPL-DFU cannot be supported for platform less than 160KB
> (like am335x).

I will ask on ML if there is any other interested party in SPL-DFU
support (and what are their limitations of SPL code size).

> 
> Any suggestion ?
> 
> Regards
> Ravi 
> 



-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-31  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-27 13:39 [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/5] SPL: DFU Support in SPL Ravi Babu
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/5] spl: dfu: add dfu support " Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 11:54   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 13:43     ` B, Ravi
2016-05-30 14:59       ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31  6:39         ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31  8:39           ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31  9:04             ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31  9:55               ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2016-05-31 10:34                 ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 12:47                   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-31 13:31                     ` B, Ravi
2016-05-31 15:13                       ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-02 12:39                         ` B, Ravi
2016-06-02 14:14                           ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-02 14:22                             ` B, Ravi
2016-06-03  9:27                               ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-06-03 11:35                                 ` B, Ravi
2016-06-03 11:45                                   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/5] spl: dfu: fs: adding ext4/fat filesystem support for SPL-DFU Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 11:59   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 12:52     ` B, Ravi
2016-05-30 13:20       ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 13:52         ` B, Ravi
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 3/5] spl: dfu: adding dfu support functions " Ravi Babu
2016-05-30  5:27   ` Heiko Schocher
2016-05-30 12:04   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-30 12:49     ` B, Ravi
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 4/5] dfu: spl: add generic spl-dfu function in common-spl Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 12:07   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:39 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 5/5] dra7x: spl: dfu: adding SPL-DFU support for dra7x platform Ravi Babu
2016-05-30 12:19   ` Lukasz Majewski
2016-05-27 13:42 ` [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 0/5] SPL: DFU Support in SPL Marek Vasut

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160531115526.1e8f4fc0@amdc2363 \
    --to=l.majewski@samsung.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.