From: b-liu@ti.com (Bin Liu)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:16:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160602181648.GB28820@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464888666-17728-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
> modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
> controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
> of the otg-phy.
>
> Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we
Is it guaranteed that only one of them will be otg?
> were checking the first controller who uses a phy from the block and
> then end up looking for a dr_mode property in e.g. the ehci controller.
>
> Instead of looking for nodes with a phy property, look for nodes
> with a dr_mode property, so that we actually access the dr_mode property
> in a node which has it.
Quote from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic.txt:
"- dr_mode: ...
In case this attribute isn't
passed via DT, USB DRD controllers should default to
OTG."
So it is not mandatory to define dr_mode in DT, then you wouldn't be
able to find the controller in such case.
Regards,
-Bin.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bin Liu <b-liu-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
linux-usb-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 13:16:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160602181648.GB28820@uda0271908> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464888666-17728-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:31:03PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Some SoCs have a single phy-hw-block with multiple phys, this is
> modelled by a single phy dts node, so we end up with multiple
> controller nodes with a phys property pointing to the phy-node
> of the otg-phy.
>
> Only one of these controllers typically is an otg controller, yet we
Is it guaranteed that only one of them will be otg?
> were checking the first controller who uses a phy from the block and
> then end up looking for a dr_mode property in e.g. the ehci controller.
>
> Instead of looking for nodes with a phy property, look for nodes
> with a dr_mode property, so that we actually access the dr_mode property
> in a node which has it.
Quote from Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/generic.txt:
"- dr_mode: ...
In case this attribute isn't
passed via DT, USB DRD controllers should default to
OTG."
So it is not mandatory to define dr_mode in DT, then you wouldn't be
able to find the controller in such case.
Regards,
-Bin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-02 17:31 [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add support for peripheral-only mode Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] phy-sun4i-usb: Add workaround for missing Vbus det interrupts on A31 Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] musb: sunxi: Simplify dr_mode handling Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 17:31 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-02 18:16 ` Bin Liu [this message]
2016-06-02 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/4] USB: Fix of_usb_get_dr_mode_by_phy with a shared phy block Bin Liu
2016-06-03 10:34 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 10:34 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:04 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:04 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:09 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:09 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 11:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-03 11:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-06-03 11:39 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 11:39 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:12 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:12 ` Bin Liu
2016-06-03 13:15 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-03 13:15 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160602181648.GB28820@uda0271908 \
--to=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.