From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:01:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608160140.11eb0342@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465372426-4077-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
Dear all,
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:53:46 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> we only initialize swiotlb when swiotlb_force is true or not all system
> memory is DMA-able, this trivial optimization saves us 64MB when
> swiotlb is not necessary.
another solution is to call swiotlb_free() as ppc does. Either solution can
solve my problem. If maintainers prefer that solution, I can send a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Jisheng
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index c566ec8..46a4157 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/genalloc.h>
> @@ -29,6 +30,8 @@
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> +static int swiotlb __read_mostly;
> +
> static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
> bool coherent)
> {
> @@ -341,6 +344,13 @@ static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __swiotlb_dma_supported(struct device *hwdev, u64 mask)
> +{
> + if (swiotlb)
> + return swiotlb_dma_supported(hwdev, mask);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .alloc = __dma_alloc,
> .free = __dma_free,
> @@ -354,7 +364,7 @@ static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .sync_single_for_device = __swiotlb_sync_single_for_device,
> .sync_sg_for_cpu = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
> .sync_sg_for_device = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device,
> - .dma_supported = swiotlb_dma_supported,
> + .dma_supported = __swiotlb_dma_supported,
> .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
> };
>
> @@ -513,6 +523,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dummy_dma_ops);
>
> static int __init arm64_dma_init(void)
> {
> + if (swiotlb_force || max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> + swiotlb = 1;
> +
> return atomic_pool_init();
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_dma_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index d45f862..7d25b4d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,8 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
> */
> void __init mem_init(void)
> {
> - swiotlb_init(1);
> + if (swiotlb_force || max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> + swiotlb_init(1);
>
> set_max_mapnr(pfn_to_page(max_pfn) - mem_map);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
To: <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:01:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608160140.11eb0342@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465372426-4077-1-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
Dear all,
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:53:46 +0800 Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> we only initialize swiotlb when swiotlb_force is true or not all system
> memory is DMA-able, this trivial optimization saves us 64MB when
> swiotlb is not necessary.
another solution is to call swiotlb_free() as ppc does. Either solution can
solve my problem. If maintainers prefer that solution, I can send a v2 patch.
Thanks,
Jisheng
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index c566ec8..46a4157 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/gfp.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
> #include <linux/export.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/genalloc.h>
> @@ -29,6 +30,8 @@
>
> #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>
> +static int swiotlb __read_mostly;
> +
> static pgprot_t __get_dma_pgprot(struct dma_attrs *attrs, pgprot_t prot,
> bool coherent)
> {
> @@ -341,6 +344,13 @@ static int __swiotlb_get_sgtable(struct device *dev, struct sg_table *sgt,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int __swiotlb_dma_supported(struct device *hwdev, u64 mask)
> +{
> + if (swiotlb)
> + return swiotlb_dma_supported(hwdev, mask);
> + return 1;
> +}
> +
> static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .alloc = __dma_alloc,
> .free = __dma_free,
> @@ -354,7 +364,7 @@ static struct dma_map_ops swiotlb_dma_ops = {
> .sync_single_for_device = __swiotlb_sync_single_for_device,
> .sync_sg_for_cpu = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_cpu,
> .sync_sg_for_device = __swiotlb_sync_sg_for_device,
> - .dma_supported = swiotlb_dma_supported,
> + .dma_supported = __swiotlb_dma_supported,
> .mapping_error = swiotlb_dma_mapping_error,
> };
>
> @@ -513,6 +523,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dummy_dma_ops);
>
> static int __init arm64_dma_init(void)
> {
> + if (swiotlb_force || max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> + swiotlb = 1;
> +
> return atomic_pool_init();
> }
> arch_initcall(arm64_dma_init);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index d45f862..7d25b4d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -403,7 +403,8 @@ static void __init free_unused_memmap(void)
> */
> void __init mem_init(void)
> {
> - swiotlb_init(1);
> + if (swiotlb_force || max_pfn > (arm64_dma_phys_limit >> PAGE_SHIFT))
> + swiotlb_init(1);
>
> set_max_mapnr(pfn_to_page(max_pfn) - mem_map);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-08 7:53 [PATCH] arm64: mm: only initialize swiotlb when necessary Jisheng Zhang
2016-06-08 7:53 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-06-08 8:01 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2016-06-08 8:01 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-06-08 12:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-08 12:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-08 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-08 15:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-21 16:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-21 16:06 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-21 20:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-21 20:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-22 16:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-22 16:56 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-08 12:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-08 12:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-06-12 7:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-06-12 7:14 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608160140.11eb0342@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.