All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone data
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:08:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610120830.GM22406@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160530082350.24285-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [160530 01:26]:
> The McBSPLP's sidetone main clock is the McBSPLP's ICLK, not FCLK as the
> sidetone only receives the ICLK from the main McBSP module.
> Since the McBSP and sidetone is using the very same clock from PRCM level
> the sidetone must not have the prcm section to check the clock status since
> the sidetone is only used when McBSP is already configured.
> If two separate hwmods looking at the same bit and they would use
> pm_runtime in nested way (as it must happen with McBSP and it's ST module)
> the hwmod would warn, because the idlest will not match what it is expected
> after enable/disable of the clocks.

OK thanks for fixing this. I'm applying patches 2-7 into
omap-for-v4.8/soc.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/7] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone data
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:08:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610120830.GM22406@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160530082350.24285-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [160530 01:26]:
> The McBSPLP's sidetone main clock is the McBSPLP's ICLK, not FCLK as the
> sidetone only receives the ICLK from the main McBSP module.
> Since the McBSP and sidetone is using the very same clock from PRCM level
> the sidetone must not have the prcm section to check the clock status since
> the sidetone is only used when McBSP is already configured.
> If two separate hwmods looking at the same bit and they would use
> pm_runtime in nested way (as it must happen with McBSP and it's ST module)
> the hwmod would warn, because the idlest will not match what it is expected
> after enable/disable of the clocks.

OK thanks for fixing this. I'm applying patches 2-7 into
omap-for-v4.8/soc.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com, paul@pwsan.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
	broonie@kernel.org, t-kristo@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone data
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 05:08:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160610120830.GM22406@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160530082350.24285-3-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>

* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> [160530 01:26]:
> The McBSPLP's sidetone main clock is the McBSPLP's ICLK, not FCLK as the
> sidetone only receives the ICLK from the main McBSP module.
> Since the McBSP and sidetone is using the very same clock from PRCM level
> the sidetone must not have the prcm section to check the clock status since
> the sidetone is only used when McBSP is already configured.
> If two separate hwmods looking at the same bit and they would use
> pm_runtime in nested way (as it must happen with McBSP and it's ST module)
> the hwmod would warn, because the idlest will not match what it is expected
> after enable/disable of the clocks.

OK thanks for fixing this. I'm applying patches 2-7 into
omap-for-v4.8/soc.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-10 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30  8:23 [PATCH v5 0/7] ARM/ASoC: OMAP3: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone support Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] ARM: dts: omap3: Add clocks to McBSP nodes Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
     [not found]   ` <20160530082350.24285-2-peter.ujfalusi-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-10 11:34     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-06-10 11:34       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-06-10 11:34       ` Tony Lindgren
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] ARM: OMAP3: hwmod data: Fix McBSP2/3 sidetone data Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-06-10 12:08   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2016-06-10 12:08     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-06-10 12:08     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] ARM: OMAP3: McBSP: New callback for McBSP2/3 ICLK idle configuration Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] ARM: OMAP3: pdata-quirks: Add support for McBSP2/3 sidetone handling Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Rename omap_mcbsp_sysfs_remove() to omap_mcbsp_cleanup() Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] ASoC: omap-mcbsp: sidetone: Use the new callback for iclk handling Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] ARM: OMAP2+: McBSP: Remove the old iclk allow/deny idle code Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi
2016-05-30  8:23   ` Peter Ujfalusi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160610120830.GM22406@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.