is there an actual "compiler-gcc6.h" patch?

is there an actual "compiler-gcc6.h" patch?

[Robert P. J. Day]

  following on a post to the list from back on jun 1:

https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg29568.html

i figured it wouldn't be hard to find the place where that header file
was added to the master branch for (in this case) the 4.1 kernel, but
i just checked the git repo, master branch, and i don't see that file
there, but i see that a patch to add it was submitted back on june 2:

https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1/Fix-the-compile-issue-under-gcc6.patch

so what is the status of this? am i just reading this incorrectly? or
doing something wrong?

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: is there an actual "compiler-gcc6.h" patch?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>
>   following on a post to the list from back on jun 1:
>
> https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg29568.html
>
> i figured it wouldn't be hard to find the place where that header file
> was added to the master branch for (in this case) the 4.1 kernel, but
> i just checked the git repo, master branch, and i don't see that file
> there, but i see that a patch to add it was submitted back on june 2:
>
> https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1/Fix-the-compile-issue-under-gcc6.patch
>
> so what is the status of this? am i just reading this incorrectly? or
> doing something wrong?

  i do realize that that patch referred to above was for the
meta-fsl-arm repo, i just assumed it would work its way into master in
short order. but i could be totally off-base here.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================

Re: is there an actual "compiler-gcc6.h" patch?

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1606 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:51:11AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> >
> >   following on a post to the list from back on jun 1:
> >
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg29568.html
> >
> > i figured it wouldn't be hard to find the place where that header file
> > was added to the master branch for (in this case) the 4.1 kernel, but
> > i just checked the git repo, master branch, and i don't see that file
> > there, but i see that a patch to add it was submitted back on june 2:
> >
> > https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1/Fix-the-compile-issue-under-gcc6.patch
> >
> > so what is the status of this? am i just reading this incorrectly? or
> > doing something wrong?
> 
>   i do realize that that patch referred to above was for the
> meta-fsl-arm repo, i just assumed it would work its way into master in
> short order. but i could be totally off-base here.

Backport this change to your kernel:

From cb984d101b30eb7478d32df56a0023e4603cba7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:01:02 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] compiler-gcc: integrate the various compiler-gcc[345].h files

As gcc major version numbers are going to advance rather rapidly in the
future, there's no real value in separate files for each compiler
version.

Deduplicate some of the macros #defined in each file too.

Neaten comments using normal kernel commenting style.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: is there an actual "compiler-gcc6.h" patch?

[Robert P. J. Day]

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:51:11AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >   following on a post to the list from back on jun 1:
> > >
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/yocto@yoctoproject.org/msg29568.html
> > >
> > > i figured it wouldn't be hard to find the place where that header file
> > > was added to the master branch for (in this case) the 4.1 kernel, but
> > > i just checked the git repo, master branch, and i don't see that file
> > > there, but i see that a patch to add it was submitted back on june 2:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/Freescale/meta-fsl-arm/blob/master/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-ls1/Fix-the-compile-issue-under-gcc6.patch
> > >
> > > so what is the status of this? am i just reading this incorrectly? or
> > > doing something wrong?
> >
> >   i do realize that that patch referred to above was for the
> > meta-fsl-arm repo, i just assumed it would work its way into master in
> > short order. but i could be totally off-base here.
>
> Backport this change to your kernel:
>
> From cb984d101b30eb7478d32df56a0023e4603cba7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 15:01:02 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] compiler-gcc: integrate the various compiler-gcc[345].h files
>
> As gcc major version numbers are going to advance rather rapidly in the
> future, there's no real value in separate files for each compiler
> version.
>
> Deduplicate some of the macros #defined in each file too.
>
> Neaten comments using normal kernel commenting style.

  amusingly, i *just* noticed that the current standard/base branch no
longer had the various versions of that file, and said to myself,
"huh, i guess they just merged them all." so using the standard/base
branch is going to resolve this for me. thanks.

rday

-- 

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                                 Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
                        http://crashcourse.ca

Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn:                               http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================