From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
mlangsdorf@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: pmu: Enable multiple PMUs in an ACPI system
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615132246.GL24029@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465511013-10742-8-git-send-email-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Its possible that an ACPI system has multiple CPU types in it
> with differing PMU counters. Use the newly provided acpi_pmu routines
> to detect that case, and instantiate more than one set of counters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 7 +++-
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index 865a9db..97007ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,12 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!ret)
> ret = init_fn(pmu);
> } else {
> - ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, read_cpuid_id());
> + if (acpi_disabled) {
> + /* use the current cpu. */
> + ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table,
> + read_cpuid_id());
> + } else
> + ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, pdev->id);
> }
>
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> index a257fc0..8f9bea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct pmu_types {
[...]
> + pmus = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct pmu_types),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (pmus) {
> + arm_pmu_acpi_determine_cpu_types(pmus);
> +
> + for (j = 0; pmus[j].cpu_count; j++) {
> + pr_devel("CPU type %X, count %d\n", pmus[j].cpu_type,
> + pmus[j].cpu_count);
> + res = kcalloc(pmus[j].cpu_count,
> + sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
Given that you already have dynamic allocation in here, why not use a
linked-list for the pmus list, and avoid having a potentially huge temporary
data structure?
Will
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] arm64: pmu: Enable multiple PMUs in an ACPI system
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 14:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615132246.GL24029@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465511013-10742-8-git-send-email-jeremy.linton@arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:23:32PM -0500, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Its possible that an ACPI system has multiple CPU types in it
> with differing PMU counters. Use the newly provided acpi_pmu routines
> to detect that case, and instantiate more than one set of counters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 7 +++-
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> index 865a9db..97007ec 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> @@ -1049,7 +1049,12 @@ int arm_pmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (!ret)
> ret = init_fn(pmu);
> } else {
> - ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, read_cpuid_id());
> + if (acpi_disabled) {
> + /* use the current cpu. */
> + ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table,
> + read_cpuid_id());
> + } else
> + ret = probe_plat_pmu(pmu, probe_table, pdev->id);
> }
>
> if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> index a257fc0..8f9bea3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ struct pmu_types {
[...]
> + pmus = kcalloc(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(struct pmu_types),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (pmus) {
> + arm_pmu_acpi_determine_cpu_types(pmus);
> +
> + for (j = 0; pmus[j].cpu_count; j++) {
> + pr_devel("CPU type %X, count %d\n", pmus[j].cpu_type,
> + pmus[j].cpu_count);
> + res = kcalloc(pmus[j].cpu_count,
> + sizeof(struct resource), GFP_KERNEL);
Given that you already have dynamic allocation in here, why not use a
linked-list for the pmus list, and avoid having a potentially huge temporary
data structure?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-09 22:23 [PATCH 0/8] arm64: pmu: Detect multiple PMU types in an ACPI system Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 1/8] arm64: pmu: add fallback probe table Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 10:59 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 10:59 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 2/8] arm64: pmu: Probe default hw/cache counters Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 11:14 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 3/8] arm64: pmu: Add support for probing with ACPI Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 11:33 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 11:33 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 15:07 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 15:07 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 4/8] arm: arm64: Add routine to determine cpuid of other cpus Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-20 16:49 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 16:49 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 5/8] arm: arm64: pmu: Assign platform PMU CPU affinity Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 13:09 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 13:09 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-20 16:40 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 16:40 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 16:49 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-20 16:49 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-20 17:01 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 17:01 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 6/8] arm64: pmu: Add routines for detecting differing PMU types in the system Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 7/8] arm64: pmu: Enable multiple PMUs in an ACPI system Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 13:22 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-06-15 13:22 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 15:21 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 15:21 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-15 15:30 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-15 15:30 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-20 16:37 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 16:37 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 21:44 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-20 21:44 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-21 8:34 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-21 8:34 ` Punit Agrawal
2016-06-09 22:23 ` [PATCH 8/8] MAINTAINERS: Tweak ARM PMU maintainers Jeremy Linton
2016-06-09 22:23 ` Jeremy Linton
2016-06-20 16:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] arm64: pmu: Detect multiple PMU types in an ACPI system Punit Agrawal
2016-06-20 16:47 ` Punit Agrawal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160615132246.GL24029@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlangsdorf@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.