From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [x86] 5ac0c41bf3: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:25:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615142532.GE32588@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57614955.l3IQMtSfaGPEBdCy%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3716 bytes --]
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:25:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> [ 0.556833] Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
> [ 0.559888] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.559888] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.561405] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x44/0x70
> [ 0.561405] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x44/0x70
> [ 0.567649] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0
> [ 0.567649] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0
Btw, Andy, this error message is completely useless - I
wanna know *where* the RDMSR in the code is, not point me at
ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe().
IOW, I wanna convert the current thing into this:
[ 0.028003] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0 at rIP: 0xffffffff81026d9f
[ 0.030343] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'
[ 0.032003] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with x86_energy_perf_policy(8)
[ 0.036003] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1b0 (tried to write 0x0000000000000006) at rIP: 0xffffffff81026de1
i.e.,
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 4bb53b89f3c5..2028a5ad3433 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_ext);
bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx);
+ pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x at rIP: 0x%lx\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, regs->ip);
/* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);
bool ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x)\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx,
- (unsigned int)regs->dx, (unsigned int)regs->ax);
+ pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x) at rIP: 0x%lx\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, (unsigned int)regs->dx,
+ (unsigned int)regs->ax, regs->ip);
/* Pretend that the write succeeded. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
---
Ok?
As to the error message, dear LKP friends, it happens because -cpu kvm64
on native Intel hands in CPUID bits of the host, i.e., if you do this in
the guest:
$ grep epb /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm constant_tsc nopl eagerfpu pni cx16 x2apic hypervisor epb
^^^
you should have "epb" there too which is among those bits.
I can reproduce the same issue on an AMD host too by booting my guest
with
"-cpu kvm64,vendor=GenuineIntel"
Paolo, Eduardo, question: can we hide certain CPUID bits from the guest
when booting with -cpu kvm64?
In general, is there a way I can set or clear arbitrary CPUID bits so
that the guest sees what I want it to see?
And I don't mean the predefined CPUID flags which you toggle with "+" or
"-" followed by flag name. Because -cpu kvm64,-epb doesn't work.
Is there a way to make this work or should we hack it into qemu so that
we are able to do that? I.e., something like
-cpu=kvm64,cpuid=leaf6_ecx_bit3=0,...
or something smarter. But you get the idea...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: kernel test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: LKP <lkp@01.org>,
wfg@linux.intel.com, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [x86] 5ac0c41bf3: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:25:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615142532.GE32588@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57614955.l3IQMtSfaGPEBdCy%fengguang.wu@intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:25:57PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> [ 0.556833] Mountpoint-cache hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)
> [ 0.559888] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.559888] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 0.561405] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x44/0x70
> [ 0.561405] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x44/0x70
> [ 0.567649] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0
> [ 0.567649] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0
Btw, Andy, this error message is completely useless - I
wanna know *where* the RDMSR in the code is, not point me at
ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe().
IOW, I wanna convert the current thing into this:
[ 0.028003] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x1b0 at rIP: 0xffffffff81026d9f
[ 0.030343] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: Set to 'normal', was 'performance'
[ 0.032003] ENERGY_PERF_BIAS: View and update with x86_energy_perf_policy(8)
[ 0.036003] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1b0 (tried to write 0x0000000000000006) at rIP: 0xffffffff81026de1
i.e.,
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
index 4bb53b89f3c5..2028a5ad3433 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/extable.c
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_ext);
bool ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx);
+ pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x%x at rIP: 0x%lx\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, regs->ip);
/* Pretend that the read succeeded and returned 0. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
@@ -60,9 +60,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe);
bool ex_handler_wrmsr_unsafe(const struct exception_table_entry *fixup,
struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr)
{
- WARN_ONCE(1, "unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x)\n",
- (unsigned int)regs->cx,
- (unsigned int)regs->dx, (unsigned int)regs->ax);
+ pr_warn_once("unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x%x (tried to write 0x%08x%08x) at rIP: 0x%lx\n",
+ (unsigned int)regs->cx, (unsigned int)regs->dx,
+ (unsigned int)regs->ax, regs->ip);
/* Pretend that the write succeeded. */
regs->ip = ex_fixup_addr(fixup);
---
Ok?
As to the error message, dear LKP friends, it happens because -cpu kvm64
on native Intel hands in CPUID bits of the host, i.e., if you do this in
the guest:
$ grep epb /proc/cpuinfo
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 syscall nx lm constant_tsc nopl eagerfpu pni cx16 x2apic hypervisor epb
^^^
you should have "epb" there too which is among those bits.
I can reproduce the same issue on an AMD host too by booting my guest
with
"-cpu kvm64,vendor=GenuineIntel"
Paolo, Eduardo, question: can we hide certain CPUID bits from the guest
when booting with -cpu kvm64?
In general, is there a way I can set or clear arbitrary CPUID bits so
that the guest sees what I want it to see?
And I don't mean the predefined CPUID flags which you toggle with "+" or
"-" followed by flag name. Because -cpu kvm64,-epb doesn't work.
Is there a way to make this work or should we hack it into qemu so that
we are able to do that? I.e., something like
-cpu=kvm64,cpuid=leaf6_ecx_bit3=0,...
or something smarter. But you get the idea...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-15 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-15 12:25 [x86] 5ac0c41bf3: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe kernel test robot
2016-06-15 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2016-06-15 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 14:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-15 14:51 ` Eduardo Habkost
2016-06-15 17:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 17:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-15 14:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-15 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 17:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 17:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 17:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 17:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 17:55 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 18:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 18:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 18:23 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 18:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15 18:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160615142532.GE32588@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.