All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext4: underflow in alignment check
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 19:53:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620195325.GM32247@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160620160204.GG6882@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:02:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 16-06-16 10:07:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > My static checker complains that this can underflow if arg is negative
> > which is true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> How come? (1 << 30) fits even into 32-bit signed type. So where's the
> problem?

Bad changelog...  I was talking about a different issue.  I was casting
it to unsigned to take advantage of type promototion.  Assume we have:

int arg = 1 << 31;

(arg > (1 << 30)) // <-- this is false
(arg > (1U << 30)) // <-- this is true so there is no underflow.

regards,
dan carpenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] ext4: underflow in alignment check
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:53:26 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160620195325.GM32247@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160620160204.GG6882@quack2.suse.cz>

On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:02:04PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 16-06-16 10:07:09, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > My static checker complains that this can underflow if arg is negative
> > which is true.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> 
> How come? (1 << 30) fits even into 32-bit signed type. So where's the
> problem?

Bad changelog...  I was talking about a different issue.  I was casting
it to unsigned to take advantage of type promototion.  Assume we have:

int arg = 1 << 31;

(arg > (1 << 30)) // <-- this is false
(arg > (1U << 30)) // <-- this is true so there is no underflow.

regards,
dan carpenter

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-20 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-16  7:07 [patch] ext4: underflow in alignment check Dan Carpenter
2016-06-16  7:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-06-20 16:02 ` Jan Kara
2016-06-20 16:02   ` Jan Kara
2016-06-20 19:53   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2016-06-20 19:53     ` Dan Carpenter
2016-06-21  7:43     ` Jan Kara
2016-06-21  7:43       ` Jan Kara
2016-06-21 13:06       ` Dan Carpenter
2016-06-21 13:06         ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160620195325.GM32247@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.