All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jann-XZ1E9jl8jIdeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)"
	<mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman"
	<ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-security-module
	<linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Documenting ptrace access mode checking
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:55:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621205550.GA5191@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e335a243-2199-2185-c7b3-fb1c898e9ab4-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7926 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:41:16AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Jann, Stephen, et al.
> 
> Jann, since you recently committed a patch in this area, and Stephen,
> since you committed 006ebb40d3d much further back in time, I wonder if
> you might help me by reviewing the text below that I propose to add to
> the ptrace(2) man page, in order to document "ptrace access mode 
> checking" that is performed in various parts of the kernel-user-space
> interface. Of course, I welcome input from anyone else as well.
> 
> Here's the new ptrace(2) text. Any comments, technical or terminological
> fixes, other improvements, etc. are welcome.

As others have said, I'm surprised about seeing documentation about
kernel-internal constants in manpages - but I think it might be a good
thing to have there, given that people who look at ptrace(2) are likely
to be interested in low-level details.


> [[
>    Ptrace access mode checking
>        Various parts of the kernel-user-space API (not just  ptrace(2)
>        operations), require so-called "ptrace access mode permissions"
>        which are gated  by  Linux  Security  Modules  (LSMs)  such  as
>        SELinux,  Yama,  Smack,  or  the  default  LSM.  Prior to Linux
>        2.6.27, all such checks were of a  single  type.   Since  Linux
>        2.6.27, two access mode levels are distinguished:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ
>               For  "read" operations or other operations that are less
>               dangerous, such as: get_robust_list(2); kcmp(2); reading
>               /proc/[pid]/auxv,         /proc/[pid]/environ,        or
>               /proc/[pid]/stat; or readlink(2) of  a  /proc/[pid]/ns/*
>               file.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH
>               For  "write"  operations,  or  other operations that are
>               more    dangerous,    such    as:    ptrace    attaching
>               (PTRACE_ATTACH)    to   another   process   or   calling
>               process_vm_writev(2).   (PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH  was  effec‐
>               tively the default before Linux 2.6.27.)
> 
>        Since  Linux  4.5, the above access mode checks may be combined

s/may/must/; otherwise __ptrace_may_access() will yell about the kernel
code being broken and deny access.

>        (ORed) with one of the following modifiers:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS
>               Use the caller's filesystem UID  and  GID  (see  creden‐
>               tials(7)) or effective capabilities for LSM checks.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS
>               Use the caller's real UID and GID or permitted capabili‐
>               ties for LSM checks.  This was effectively  the  default
>               before Linux 4.5.
> 
>        Because  combining  one of the credential modifiers with one of
>        the aforementioned access modes is  typical,  some  macros  are
>        defined in the kernel sources for the combinations:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_READ | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_READ | PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH | PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS.
> 
>        One further modifier can be ORed with the access mode:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT (since Linux 3.3)
>               Don't audit this access mode check.
> 
> [I'd quite welcome some text to explain "auditing" here.]
> 
>        The  algorithm  employed for ptrace access mode checking deter‐
>        mines whether the calling process is  allowed  to  perform  the
>        corresponding action on the target process, as follows:
> 
>        1.  If the calling thread and the target thread are in the same
>            thread group, access is always allowed.
> 
>        2.  If the access mode specifies PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS, then  for
>            the  check in the next step, employ the caller's filesystem
>            user ID and group ID (see credentials(7));  otherwise  (the
>            access  mode  specifies  PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS, so) use the
>            caller's real user ID and group ID.

Might want to add a "for historical reasons" or so here.


>        3.  Deny access if neither of the following is true:
> 
>            · The real, effective, and saved-set user IDs of the target
>              match  the caller's user ID, and the real, effective, and
>              saved-set group IDs of  the  target  match  the  caller's
>              group ID.
> 
>            · The caller has the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability.

Might want to also specify here (like below) that the caller needs to
have the capability relative to the user ns of the target.


>        4.  Deny  access if the target process "dumpable" attribute has
>            a value other than 1 (SUID_DUMP_USER; see the discussion of
>            PR_SET_DUMPABLE  in prctl(2)), and the caller does not have
>            the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability in the user namespace of  the
>            target process.
> 
>        5.  The  kernel LSM security_ptrace_access_check() interface is
>            invoked to see if ptrace access is permitted.  The  results
>            depend on the LSM.  The implementation of this interface in
>            the default LSM performs the following steps:

For people who are unaware of how the LSM API works, it might be good to
clarify that the commoncap LSM is *always* invoked; otherwise, it might
give the impression that using another LSM would replace it.
(Also, are there other documents that refer to it as "default LSM"? I
think that that term is slightly confusing.)


>            a) If the access mode  includes  PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS,  then
>               use the caller's effective capability set in the follow‐
>               ing  check;  otherwise  (the   access   mode   specifies
>               PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS,  so)  use  the caller's permitted
>               capability set.
> 
>            b) Deny access if neither of the following is true:
> 
>               · The caller's capabilities are a proper superset of the
>                 target process's permitted capabilities.

This also requires the caller and the target to be in the same user
namespace.


>               · The  caller  has  the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability in the
>                 target process's user namespace.
> 
>               Note that the default LSM does not  distinguish  between
>               PTRACE_MODE_READ and PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH.
> 
>        6.  If  access  has  not  been  denied  by any of the preceding
>            steps, then access is allowed.
> ]]
> 
> There are accompanying changes to various pages that refer to 
> the new text in ptrace(2), so that, for example, kcmp(2) adds:
> 
>        Permission  to  employ kcmp() is governed by ptrace access mode
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS checks against both pid1 and pid2;
>        see ptrace(2).

(Actually, kcmp() just needs READ access - you described that accurately
earlier, but it's wrong here.)


> and proc.5 has additions such as:
> 
>        /proc/[pid]/auxv (since 2.6.0-test7)
>               ...
>               Permission to access this file is governed by  a  ptrace
>               access    mode   PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS   check;   see
>               ptrace(2).
> 
>        /proc/[pid]/cwd
>               ...
>               Permission to dereference  or  read  (readlink(2))  this
>               symbolic  link  is  governed  by  a  ptrace  access mode
>               PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS check; see ptrace(2).

That sounds great! :)

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-security-module <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Documenting ptrace access mode checking
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 22:55:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160621205550.GA5191@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e335a243-2199-2185-c7b3-fb1c898e9ab4@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7926 bytes --]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:41:16AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
> Hi Jann, Stephen, et al.
> 
> Jann, since you recently committed a patch in this area, and Stephen,
> since you committed 006ebb40d3d much further back in time, I wonder if
> you might help me by reviewing the text below that I propose to add to
> the ptrace(2) man page, in order to document "ptrace access mode 
> checking" that is performed in various parts of the kernel-user-space
> interface. Of course, I welcome input from anyone else as well.
> 
> Here's the new ptrace(2) text. Any comments, technical or terminological
> fixes, other improvements, etc. are welcome.

As others have said, I'm surprised about seeing documentation about
kernel-internal constants in manpages - but I think it might be a good
thing to have there, given that people who look at ptrace(2) are likely
to be interested in low-level details.


> [[
>    Ptrace access mode checking
>        Various parts of the kernel-user-space API (not just  ptrace(2)
>        operations), require so-called "ptrace access mode permissions"
>        which are gated  by  Linux  Security  Modules  (LSMs)  such  as
>        SELinux,  Yama,  Smack,  or  the  default  LSM.  Prior to Linux
>        2.6.27, all such checks were of a  single  type.   Since  Linux
>        2.6.27, two access mode levels are distinguished:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ
>               For  "read" operations or other operations that are less
>               dangerous, such as: get_robust_list(2); kcmp(2); reading
>               /proc/[pid]/auxv,         /proc/[pid]/environ,        or
>               /proc/[pid]/stat; or readlink(2) of  a  /proc/[pid]/ns/*
>               file.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH
>               For  "write"  operations,  or  other operations that are
>               more    dangerous,    such    as:    ptrace    attaching
>               (PTRACE_ATTACH)    to   another   process   or   calling
>               process_vm_writev(2).   (PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH  was  effec‐
>               tively the default before Linux 2.6.27.)
> 
>        Since  Linux  4.5, the above access mode checks may be combined

s/may/must/; otherwise __ptrace_may_access() will yell about the kernel
code being broken and deny access.

>        (ORed) with one of the following modifiers:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS
>               Use the caller's filesystem UID  and  GID  (see  creden‐
>               tials(7)) or effective capabilities for LSM checks.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS
>               Use the caller's real UID and GID or permitted capabili‐
>               ties for LSM checks.  This was effectively  the  default
>               before Linux 4.5.
> 
>        Because  combining  one of the credential modifiers with one of
>        the aforementioned access modes is  typical,  some  macros  are
>        defined in the kernel sources for the combinations:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_READ | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_READ | PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_FSCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH | PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS.
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS
>               Defined as PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH | PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS.
> 
>        One further modifier can be ORed with the access mode:
> 
>        PTRACE_MODE_NOAUDIT (since Linux 3.3)
>               Don't audit this access mode check.
> 
> [I'd quite welcome some text to explain "auditing" here.]
> 
>        The  algorithm  employed for ptrace access mode checking deter‐
>        mines whether the calling process is  allowed  to  perform  the
>        corresponding action on the target process, as follows:
> 
>        1.  If the calling thread and the target thread are in the same
>            thread group, access is always allowed.
> 
>        2.  If the access mode specifies PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS, then  for
>            the  check in the next step, employ the caller's filesystem
>            user ID and group ID (see credentials(7));  otherwise  (the
>            access  mode  specifies  PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS, so) use the
>            caller's real user ID and group ID.

Might want to add a "for historical reasons" or so here.


>        3.  Deny access if neither of the following is true:
> 
>            · The real, effective, and saved-set user IDs of the target
>              match  the caller's user ID, and the real, effective, and
>              saved-set group IDs of  the  target  match  the  caller's
>              group ID.
> 
>            · The caller has the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability.

Might want to also specify here (like below) that the caller needs to
have the capability relative to the user ns of the target.


>        4.  Deny  access if the target process "dumpable" attribute has
>            a value other than 1 (SUID_DUMP_USER; see the discussion of
>            PR_SET_DUMPABLE  in prctl(2)), and the caller does not have
>            the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability in the user namespace of  the
>            target process.
> 
>        5.  The  kernel LSM security_ptrace_access_check() interface is
>            invoked to see if ptrace access is permitted.  The  results
>            depend on the LSM.  The implementation of this interface in
>            the default LSM performs the following steps:

For people who are unaware of how the LSM API works, it might be good to
clarify that the commoncap LSM is *always* invoked; otherwise, it might
give the impression that using another LSM would replace it.
(Also, are there other documents that refer to it as "default LSM"? I
think that that term is slightly confusing.)


>            a) If the access mode  includes  PTRACE_MODE_FSCREDS,  then
>               use the caller's effective capability set in the follow‐
>               ing  check;  otherwise  (the   access   mode   specifies
>               PTRACE_MODE_REALCREDS,  so)  use  the caller's permitted
>               capability set.
> 
>            b) Deny access if neither of the following is true:
> 
>               · The caller's capabilities are a proper superset of the
>                 target process's permitted capabilities.

This also requires the caller and the target to be in the same user
namespace.


>               · The  caller  has  the CAP_SYS_PTRACE capability in the
>                 target process's user namespace.
> 
>               Note that the default LSM does not  distinguish  between
>               PTRACE_MODE_READ and PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH.
> 
>        6.  If  access  has  not  been  denied  by any of the preceding
>            steps, then access is allowed.
> ]]
> 
> There are accompanying changes to various pages that refer to 
> the new text in ptrace(2), so that, for example, kcmp(2) adds:
> 
>        Permission  to  employ kcmp() is governed by ptrace access mode
>        PTRACE_MODE_ATTACH_REALCREDS checks against both pid1 and pid2;
>        see ptrace(2).

(Actually, kcmp() just needs READ access - you described that accurately
earlier, but it's wrong here.)


> and proc.5 has additions such as:
> 
>        /proc/[pid]/auxv (since 2.6.0-test7)
>               ...
>               Permission to access this file is governed by  a  ptrace
>               access    mode   PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS   check;   see
>               ptrace(2).
> 
>        /proc/[pid]/cwd
>               ...
>               Permission to dereference  or  read  (readlink(2))  this
>               symbolic  link  is  governed  by  a  ptrace  access mode
>               PTRACE_MODE_READ_FSCREDS check; see ptrace(2).

That sounds great! :)

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-21 20:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-21  9:41 Documenting ptrace access mode checking Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-21  9:41 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found] ` <e335a243-2199-2185-c7b3-fb1c898e9ab4-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 19:55   ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-21 19:55     ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]     ` <87ziqewc3r.fsf-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 20:29       ` Kees Cook
2016-06-21 20:29         ` Kees Cook
     [not found]         ` <CAGXu5jLwuqS5w-Thpngc=hFhXOdM-Q5_G1v9np1sOnmq+v2c4g-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 20:58           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-21 20:58             ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-22 19:20           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 19:20             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 19:20       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 19:20         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]         ` <4c6a338f-619b-9e99-9fd8-1cf6d86ecfed-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-23 19:04           ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-23 19:04             ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-24  9:57             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 21:51     ` Oleg Nesterov
     [not found]       ` <20160622215142.GA14751-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-23  7:06         ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-23  7:06           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]           ` <f8069f83-f7b6-ee2c-5167-fa0d50732180-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-23 18:56             ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-06-23 18:56               ` Eric W. Biederman
     [not found]               ` <871t3nka3c.fsf-JOvCrm2gF+uungPnsOpG7nhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-24  8:18                 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-24  8:18                   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-21 20:55   ` Jann Horn [this message]
2016-06-21 20:55     ` Jann Horn
2016-06-22 19:21     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 19:21       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]       ` <86486234-d78a-234b-58bb-6ca646881dc6-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-22 21:11         ` Kees Cook
2016-06-22 21:11           ` Kees Cook
     [not found]           ` <CAGXu5j+DoWCT=NwZK-yNBmZOu9LdEn=0-gjJvtPVmNJFanWoKA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-23  7:02             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-23  7:02               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-24  8:40             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-24  8:40               ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-24 15:18               ` Casey Schaufler
     [not found]                 ` <f45383ca-6bdc-bba0-07d0-a8e3cb9c08d2-iSGtlc1asvQWG2LlvL+J4A@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-24 20:07                   ` Kees Cook
2016-06-24 20:07                     ` Kees Cook
2016-06-25  7:21                   ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-25  7:21                     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-22 22:44       ` Jann Horn
     [not found]         ` <20160622224428.GA15902-J1fxOzX/cBvk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-23  7:42           ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-23  7:42             ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
     [not found]             ` <33209000-3fd4-0b26-f249-eb4e1a9e1651-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-24  6:35               ` Jann Horn
2016-06-24  6:35                 ` Jann Horn
2016-06-23 18:05 ` Stephen Smalley
     [not found]   ` <fe5a5f9a-87f8-8483-58cf-61c73aa1ecdd-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-24  8:33     ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2016-06-24  8:33       ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160621205550.GA5191@pc.thejh.net \
    --to=jann-xz1e9jl8jideowh0uzbu5w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=ebiederm-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jmorris-gx6/JNMH7DfYtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=keescook-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-man-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mtk.manpages-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=sds-+05T5uksL2qpZYMLLGbcSA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.