From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@mork.no, mmarek@suse.cz,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST, PATCH] builddeb: really include objtool binary in headers package
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:51:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623225104.GA13461@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623214421.GD3554@kaos.lebenslange-mailadresse.de>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:44:22PM +0000, Wilfried Klaebe wrote:
> On May 4th, Bjørn Mork provided patch
> 697bbc7b832048d3a679cd55caf2268a325efbe0 to include objtool binaries in
> the headers package. However, that one only works if $srctree=$objtree,
> because the objtool binaries are not written to the srctree, but
> to the objtree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Klaebe <linux-kernel@lebenslange-mailadresse.de>
> ---
> builddeb | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bjorn@mork.no, mmarek@suse.cz,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST, PATCH] builddeb: really include objtool binary in headers package
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:51:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160623225104.GA13461@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623214421.GD3554@kaos.lebenslange-mailadresse.de>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 09:44:22PM +0000, Wilfried Klaebe wrote:
> On May 4th, Bj�rn Mork provided patch
> 697bbc7b832048d3a679cd55caf2268a325efbe0 to include objtool binaries in
> the headers package. However, that one only works if $srctree=$objtree,
> because the objtool binaries are not written to the srctree, but
> to the objtree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wilfried Klaebe <linux-kernel@lebenslange-mailadresse.de>
> ---
> builddeb | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-23 22:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-23 21:44 [REPOST, PATCH] builddeb: really include objtool binary in headers package Wilfried Klaebe
2016-06-23 21:44 ` Wilfried Klaebe
2016-06-23 22:51 ` Greg KH [this message]
2016-06-23 22:51 ` Greg KH
2016-06-24 7:32 ` Bjørn Mork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160623225104.GA13461@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bjorn@mork.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.