From: hch@infradead.org (Christoph Hellwig)
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:00:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624080044.GA17446@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576CE504.5020101@jbeekman.nl>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016@12:45:08AM -0700, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> As you found NVMe points to SPC-4. SPC-4 lists protocol 0xEF "ATA Device Server
> Password Security" as part of the SECURITY PROTOCOL IN command, pointing to
> SAT-2. In one SAT-2 draft I could find there is are these sections
>
> 12 SAT-specific SCSI extensions
> 12.5 SAT-specific Security Protocols
> 12.5.1 ATA Device Server Password Security Protocol
>
> which provide a pretty straightforward translation of the ATA SECURITY feature
> set (except that there is a new command to gather information that would
> normally be part of ATA IDENTIFY). I have implemented all this and it seems to
> work on my drive.
Oh, fun. Can you add a little file in Documentation that explains this
chain and how we end up building the NVMe commands?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jethro Beekman <kernel@jbeekman.nl>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
keith.busch@intel.com, axboe@fb.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 01:00:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160624080044.GA17446@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <576CE504.5020101@jbeekman.nl>
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:45:08AM -0700, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> As you found NVMe points to SPC-4. SPC-4 lists protocol 0xEF "ATA Device Server
> Password Security" as part of the SECURITY PROTOCOL IN command, pointing to
> SAT-2. In one SAT-2 draft I could find there is are these sections
>
> 12 SAT-specific SCSI extensions
> 12.5 SAT-specific Security Protocols
> 12.5.1 ATA Device Server Password Security Protocol
>
> which provide a pretty straightforward translation of the ATA SECURITY feature
> set (except that there is a new command to gather information that would
> normally be part of ATA IDENTIFY). I have implemented all this and it seems to
> work on my drive.
Oh, fun. Can you add a little file in Documentation that explains this
chain and how we end up building the NVMe commands?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-19 23:06 [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] nvme: When scanning namespaces, make sure the drive is not locked Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 2/3] nvme: Add function for NVMe security receive command Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: Check if drive is locked using ATA Security Jethro Beekman
2016-06-19 23:06 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 6:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] nvme: Don't add namespaces for locked drives Sagi Grimberg
2016-06-20 6:46 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-20 15:26 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-20 15:26 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-20 18:21 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-20 18:21 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-20 22:54 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-20 22:54 ` Keith Busch
2016-06-21 3:50 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-21 3:50 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-24 7:45 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 7:45 ` Jethro Beekman
2016-06-24 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-06-24 8:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160624080044.GA17446@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.