From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: kthread_stop insanity (Re: [[DEBUG] force] 2642458962: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000997f18)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:47:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160628224748.GA8591@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwiVYfFfTjN5j-C6cwA1z3hkCaq7A+hqaW4dG4Yon4Saw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3675 bytes --]
On 06/28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Then try_get_task_stack(tsk) becomes
>
> void *try_get_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> void *stack = tsk->stack;
> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&tsk->stackref))
> stack = NULL;
> return stack;
> }
Yes, and then we can trivilly fix the users of to_live_kthread().
So I'll wait for this change and send the simple fix on top of it.
Otherwise I'll send another ugly hack (see below).
Oleg.
---
diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
index e691b6a..7667bc62 100644
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_cpu(int (*threadfn)(void *data),
__k; \
})
+void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread);
void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu);
void kthread_bind_mask(struct task_struct *k, const struct cpumask *mask);
int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 97122f9..8643248 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -326,6 +326,23 @@ void release_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
#endif
}
+void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
+{
+ /*
+ * This is the ugly but simple hack we will hopefully remove soon.
+ * We abuse ->set_child_tid to avoid the new member and because it
+ * can't be wrongly copied by copy_process(). We also rely on fact
+ * that the caller can't exec, so PF_KTHREAD can't be cleared.
+ */
+ current->set_child_tid = (__force void __user *)kthread;
+}
+
+static void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ if (tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
+ kfree((__force void *)tsk->set_child_tid); /* can be NULL */
+}
+
void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
@@ -345,6 +362,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
put_seccomp_filter(tsk);
arch_release_task_struct(tsk);
+ free_kthread_struct(tsk);
free_task_struct(tsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task);
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 9ff173d..3a4921f 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -181,14 +181,11 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
void *data = create->data;
struct completion *done;
- struct kthread self;
+ struct kthread *self;
int ret;
- self.flags = 0;
- self.data = data;
- init_completion(&self.exited);
- init_completion(&self.parked);
- current->vfork_done = &self.exited;
+ self = kmalloc(sizeof(*self), GFP_KERNEL);
+ set_kthread_struct(self);
/* If user was SIGKILLed, I release the structure. */
done = xchg(&create->done, NULL);
@@ -196,6 +193,19 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
kfree(create);
do_exit(-EINTR);
}
+
+ if (!self) {
+ create->result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ complete(done);
+ do_exit(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ self->flags = 0;
+ self->data = data;
+ init_completion(&self->exited);
+ init_completion(&self->parked);
+ current->vfork_done = &self->exited;
+
/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
create->result = current;
@@ -203,12 +213,10 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
schedule();
ret = -EINTR;
-
- if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self.flags)) {
- __kthread_parkme(&self);
+ if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
+ __kthread_parkme(self);
ret = threadfn(data);
}
- /* we can't just return, we must preserve "self" on stack */
do_exit(ret);
}
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
LKP <lkp@01.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: kthread_stop insanity (Re: [[DEBUG] force] 2642458962: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000997f18)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 00:47:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160628224748.GA8591@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwiVYfFfTjN5j-C6cwA1z3hkCaq7A+hqaW4dG4Yon4Saw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Then try_get_task_stack(tsk) becomes
>
> void *try_get_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> void *stack = tsk->stack;
> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&tsk->stackref))
> stack = NULL;
> return stack;
> }
Yes, and then we can trivilly fix the users of to_live_kthread().
So I'll wait for this change and send the simple fix on top of it.
Otherwise I'll send another ugly hack (see below).
Oleg.
---
diff --git a/include/linux/kthread.h b/include/linux/kthread.h
index e691b6a..7667bc62 100644
--- a/include/linux/kthread.h
+++ b/include/linux/kthread.h
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ struct task_struct *kthread_create_on_cpu(int (*threadfn)(void *data),
__k; \
})
+void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread);
void kthread_bind(struct task_struct *k, unsigned int cpu);
void kthread_bind_mask(struct task_struct *k, const struct cpumask *mask);
int kthread_stop(struct task_struct *k);
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 97122f9..8643248 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -326,6 +326,23 @@ void release_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
#endif
}
+void set_kthread_struct(void *kthread)
+{
+ /*
+ * This is the ugly but simple hack we will hopefully remove soon.
+ * We abuse ->set_child_tid to avoid the new member and because it
+ * can't be wrongly copied by copy_process(). We also rely on fact
+ * that the caller can't exec, so PF_KTHREAD can't be cleared.
+ */
+ current->set_child_tid = (__force void __user *)kthread;
+}
+
+static void free_kthread_struct(struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+ if (tsk->flags & PF_KTHREAD)
+ kfree((__force void *)tsk->set_child_tid); /* can be NULL */
+}
+
void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK
@@ -345,6 +362,7 @@ void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
ftrace_graph_exit_task(tsk);
put_seccomp_filter(tsk);
arch_release_task_struct(tsk);
+ free_kthread_struct(tsk);
free_task_struct(tsk);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(free_task);
diff --git a/kernel/kthread.c b/kernel/kthread.c
index 9ff173d..3a4921f 100644
--- a/kernel/kthread.c
+++ b/kernel/kthread.c
@@ -181,14 +181,11 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
int (*threadfn)(void *data) = create->threadfn;
void *data = create->data;
struct completion *done;
- struct kthread self;
+ struct kthread *self;
int ret;
- self.flags = 0;
- self.data = data;
- init_completion(&self.exited);
- init_completion(&self.parked);
- current->vfork_done = &self.exited;
+ self = kmalloc(sizeof(*self), GFP_KERNEL);
+ set_kthread_struct(self);
/* If user was SIGKILLed, I release the structure. */
done = xchg(&create->done, NULL);
@@ -196,6 +193,19 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
kfree(create);
do_exit(-EINTR);
}
+
+ if (!self) {
+ create->result = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ complete(done);
+ do_exit(-ENOMEM);
+ }
+
+ self->flags = 0;
+ self->data = data;
+ init_completion(&self->exited);
+ init_completion(&self->parked);
+ current->vfork_done = &self->exited;
+
/* OK, tell user we're spawned, wait for stop or wakeup */
__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
create->result = current;
@@ -203,12 +213,10 @@ static int kthread(void *_create)
schedule();
ret = -EINTR;
-
- if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self.flags)) {
- __kthread_parkme(&self);
+ if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
+ __kthread_parkme(self);
ret = threadfn(data);
}
- /* we can't just return, we must preserve "self" on stack */
do_exit(ret);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-28 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-27 5:22 kthread_stop insanity (Re: [[DEBUG] force] 2642458962: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000997f18) Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 5:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 8:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-27 14:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-27 14:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-27 15:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 15:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-27 17:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 18:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 19:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 19:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 20:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 20:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 20:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 21:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-28 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 21:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-28 22:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-06-28 22:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 22:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-28 22:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-29 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-29 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-29 18:03 ` [PATCH] kthread: to_live_kthread() needs try_get_task_stack() Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-29 18:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-29 18:28 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-29 18:28 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-29 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-29 18:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-29 18:51 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-29 18:51 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-29 23:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-29 23:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-29 23:33 ` kthread_stop insanity (Re: [[DEBUG] force] 2642458962: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000997f18) Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-29 23:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-27 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-06-27 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160628224748.GA8591@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.