From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 21/20] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:36:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160629033648.GA7108@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146612796204.25024.18254357523133394284.stgit@birch.djwong.org>
This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
tests/xfs/128 | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128
index 8758d7e..2e756d5 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/128
+++ b/tests/xfs/128
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ _pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $((blks * blksz)) $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
_cp_reflink $testdir/file1 $testdir/file2
_cp_reflink $testdir/file2 $testdir/file3
_cp_reflink $testdir/file3 $testdir/file4
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks1=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ c04=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
echo "CoW the reflink copies"
_pwrite_byte 0x62 $blksz $blksz $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full
_pwrite_byte 0x63 $(( blksz * (blks - 1) )) $blksz $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks2=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -97,11 +97,12 @@ c14=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
echo "Defragment"
lsattr -l $testdir/ | _filter_scratch | _filter_spaces
+filefrag -v $testdir/file* >> $seqres.full
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks3=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: david@fromorbit.com
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [PATCH 21/20] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 20:36:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160629033648.GA7108@birch.djwong.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <146612796204.25024.18254357523133394284.stgit@birch.djwong.org>
This test uses the scratch device, so cycle that, not the test dev.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
---
tests/xfs/128 | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/xfs/128 b/tests/xfs/128
index 8758d7e..2e756d5 100755
--- a/tests/xfs/128
+++ b/tests/xfs/128
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ _pwrite_byte 0x61 0 $((blks * blksz)) $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
_cp_reflink $testdir/file1 $testdir/file2
_cp_reflink $testdir/file2 $testdir/file3
_cp_reflink $testdir/file3 $testdir/file4
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks1=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ c04=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
echo "CoW the reflink copies"
_pwrite_byte 0x62 $blksz $blksz $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full
_pwrite_byte 0x63 $(( blksz * (blks - 1) )) $blksz $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks2=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
@@ -97,11 +97,12 @@ c14=$(_md5_checksum $testdir/file4)
echo "Defragment"
lsattr -l $testdir/ | _filter_scratch | _filter_spaces
+filefrag -v $testdir/file* >> $seqres.full
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file1 >> $seqres.full
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file2 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file3 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably breaks the link
$XFS_FSR_PROG -v -d $testdir/file4 >> $seqres.full # fsr probably ignores this file
-_test_cycle_mount
+_scratch_cycle_mount
free_blocks3=$(stat -f $testdir -c '%f')
md5sum $testdir/file1 | _filter_scratch
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-29 4:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-17 1:46 [PATCH v6 00/20] xfstests: minor fixes for the reflink/dedupe tests Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 01/20] xfs/104: don't enospc when ag metadata overhead grows Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 02/20] tests: don't put loop control files on the scratch mount Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 03/20] xfs: test copy-on-write leftover recovery Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 04/20] xfs: test per-ag allocation accounting during truncate-caused refcountbt expansion Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 05/20] reflink: test interaction with swap files Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 06/20] xfs: test rmap behavior when multiple bmbt records map to a single rmapbt record Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 07/20] reflink: test changing sharers of a block while keeping refcount the same Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 08/20] xfs/122: don't break on old xfsprogs Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` [PATCH 09/20] xfs/122: fix test output to reflect latest xfsprogs Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:46 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 10/20] xfs/122: list the new log redo items Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 11/20] xfs: inject errors at various parts of the deferred op completion Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 16:39 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 16:39 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 12/20] xfs/235: fix logic errors when checking rmap usage after failures Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 13/20] xfs/229: require 3GB of space Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 14/20] xfs: test clearing reflink inode flag Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 16:40 ` [PATCH v2 " Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 16:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 15/20] xfstests: fix unreferenced variables in generic/186 and generic/187 Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 16/20] reflink: test cross-mountpoint reflink and dedupe Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-04 6:51 ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-04 6:51 ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-04 19:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-04 19:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 17/20] generic/204: increase log size for rmap/reflink Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` [PATCH 18/20] xfs/128: use $XFS_FSR_PROG instead of xfs_fsr directly Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:48 ` [PATCH 19/20] xfs: run xfs_repair at the end of each test Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-05 3:56 ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-05 3:56 ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-05 4:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-05 4:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-06 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-06 23:13 ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-06 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-06 23:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:48 ` [PATCH 20/20] xfs: scrub fs (if still mounted) at the end of the test Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-17 1:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-06-29 3:36 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2016-06-29 3:36 ` [PATCH 21/20] xfs/128: cycle_mount the scratch device, not the test device Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-05 4:31 ` [PATCH v6 00/20] xfstests: minor fixes for the reflink/dedupe tests Eryu Guan
2016-07-05 4:31 ` Eryu Guan
2016-07-06 22:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-06 22:44 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-13 5:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
2016-07-13 5:28 ` Darrick J. Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160629033648.GA7108@birch.djwong.org \
--to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.