Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree

[Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:36:58PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/s390/hypfs/hypfs_diag.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   e030c1125eab ("s390/hypfs: use basic block for diag inline assembly")
> 
> from the s390 tree and commit:
> 
>   e65f30e0cb29 ("s390: hypfs: Move diag implementation and data definitions")
> 
> from the kvm tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (my fixup patch now looks like below) and can carry the
> fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
> but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
> maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
> to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
> minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
> 
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:47:33 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] s390: merge fix up for __diag204 move
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kernel/diag.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

The fix looks good. Thanks!