From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 16:46:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529164613.526f5865@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
between commit:
0b0ed657fe00 ("s390: remove critical section cleanup from entry.S")
from the s390 tree and commit:
d075fc3154be ("KVM: s390: vsie: Move conditional reschedule")
from the kvm tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
index 4fde24a1856e,ef05b4e167fb..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
@@@ -1000,9 -1000,9 +1000,6 @@@ static int do_vsie_run(struct kvm_vcpu
handle_last_fault(vcpu, vsie_page);
- if (need_resched())
- schedule();
- if (test_cpu_flag(CIF_MCCK_PENDING))
- s390_handle_mcck();
--
srcu_read_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->srcu, vcpu->srcu_idx);
/* save current guest state of bp isolation override */
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 6:46 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2020-06-04 3:05 ` linux-next: manual merge of the kvm tree with the s390 tree Stephen Rothwell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-07-14 4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-14 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-14 6:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-07-14 6:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2016-06-29 4:36 Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-29 4:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-06-29 5:47 ` Heiko Carstens
2014-10-07 4:59 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-06 3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-06 3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-03 1:06 Stephen Rothwell
2013-01-03 7:31 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2013-01-03 10:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-08-16 3:49 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-21 3:55 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-21 1:16 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200529164613.526f5865@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.