All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 23:40:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160702234018.GU26134@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bn3kcc7o.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>

[Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 02/06/2016 (Thu 15:54) Yoshinori Sato wrote:

> On Fri, 27 May 2016 01:53:34 +0900,
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > [[PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 22/04/2016 (Fri 14:07) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to
> > > > make kernel code consistent with the Makefiles/Kconfigs that control them.
> > > 
> > > Ping -- wondering if there are any issues here, or if I can expect these
> > > to be merged upstream in the merge window.  I didn't see them loop
> > > around via the linux-next tree but I wasn't sure if arch/sh has a repo
> > > for linux-next.
> > 
> > I don't have experience with the affected code, but it looks ok unless
> > any of these "should" be modular and Kconfig was just wrong to
> > disallow it.
> > 
> > Sato-san, do you have an opinion on these? Should I go ahead and just
> > merge them?
> 
> It looks no problem.
> I think can merge it.

Just checking in a month later; my queue that I test regularly against
the linux-next tree still has these:

sh-make-heartbeat-driver-explicitly-non-modular.patch
sh-make-board-secureedge5410.c-explicitly-non-m.patch
sh-make-mm-asids-debugfs-explicitly-non-modular.patch
sh-make-time.c-explicitly-non-modular.patch

Apologies in advance if you have a sh queue that is pending but for some
reason is not fed into the nightly linux-next tree generation.  If so,
let me know and I won't worry about looking for these until merge window.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> > Rich
> > 
> > > > This means not using modular functions/macros for code that can never
> > > > be built as a module.  Some of the other downfalls this leads to are:
> > > > 
> > > >  (1) it is easy to accidentally write unused module_exit and remove code
> > > >  (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be
> > > >      modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it
> > > >  (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn
> > > >      includes nearly everything else, thus adding to CPP overhead.
> > > >  (4) it gets copied/replicated into other drivers and spreads like weeds.
> > > > 
> > > > Three of the four commits here are completely trivial with zero runtime
> > > > impact whatsoever.  The fourth has a deletion of a ".remove" function
> > > > and as we've done elsewhere, we block the sysfs ability to reach in and
> > > > manually execute that function, since there isn't a sane use case for
> > > > which doing that makes sense.
> > > > 
> > > > Build tested on today's linux-next ; full build fails on duplicate syms
> > > > from OF generic board, but that is a known and reported issue elsewhere;
> > > > it has nothing to do with the changes here.
> > > > 
> > > > Paul
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > > > Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> > > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Paul Gortmaker (4):
> > > >   sh: make time.c explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make mm/asids-debugfs explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make board-secureedge5410 explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make heartbeat driver explicitly non-modular
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/sh/boards/board-secureedge5410.c |  3 +--
> > > >  arch/sh/drivers/heartbeat.c           | 32 +++-----------------------------
> > > >  arch/sh/kernel/time.c                 |  3 +--
> > > >  arch/sh/mm/asids-debugfs.c            |  5 +----
> > > >  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.8.0
> > > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> -- 
> Yoshinori Sato
> <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 19:40:18 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160702234018.GU26134@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87bn3kcc7o.wl-ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>

[Re: [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 02/06/2016 (Thu 15:54) Yoshinori Sato wrote:

> On Fri, 27 May 2016 01:53:34 +0900,
> Rich Felker wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:45:57PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > [[PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code] On 22/04/2016 (Fri 14:07) Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > 
> > > > For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to
> > > > make kernel code consistent with the Makefiles/Kconfigs that control them.
> > > 
> > > Ping -- wondering if there are any issues here, or if I can expect these
> > > to be merged upstream in the merge window.  I didn't see them loop
> > > around via the linux-next tree but I wasn't sure if arch/sh has a repo
> > > for linux-next.
> > 
> > I don't have experience with the affected code, but it looks ok unless
> > any of these "should" be modular and Kconfig was just wrong to
> > disallow it.
> > 
> > Sato-san, do you have an opinion on these? Should I go ahead and just
> > merge them?
> 
> It looks no problem.
> I think can merge it.

Just checking in a month later; my queue that I test regularly against
the linux-next tree still has these:

sh-make-heartbeat-driver-explicitly-non-modular.patch
sh-make-board-secureedge5410.c-explicitly-non-m.patch
sh-make-mm-asids-debugfs-explicitly-non-modular.patch
sh-make-time.c-explicitly-non-modular.patch

Apologies in advance if you have a sh queue that is pending but for some
reason is not fed into the nightly linux-next tree generation.  If so,
let me know and I won't worry about looking for these until merge window.

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> > Rich
> > 
> > > > This means not using modular functions/macros for code that can never
> > > > be built as a module.  Some of the other downfalls this leads to are:
> > > > 
> > > >  (1) it is easy to accidentally write unused module_exit and remove code
> > > >  (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be
> > > >      modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it
> > > >  (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn
> > > >      includes nearly everything else, thus adding to CPP overhead.
> > > >  (4) it gets copied/replicated into other drivers and spreads like weeds.
> > > > 
> > > > Three of the four commits here are completely trivial with zero runtime
> > > > impact whatsoever.  The fourth has a deletion of a ".remove" function
> > > > and as we've done elsewhere, we block the sysfs ability to reach in and
> > > > manually execute that function, since there isn't a sane use case for
> > > > which doing that makes sense.
> > > > 
> > > > Build tested on today's linux-next ; full build fails on duplicate syms
> > > > from OF generic board, but that is a known and reported issue elsewhere;
> > > > it has nothing to do with the changes here.
> > > > 
> > > > Paul
> > > > --
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
> > > > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > > > Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
> > > > Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Paul Gortmaker (4):
> > > >   sh: make time.c explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make mm/asids-debugfs explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make board-secureedge5410 explicitly non-modular
> > > >   sh: make heartbeat driver explicitly non-modular
> > > > 
> > > >  arch/sh/boards/board-secureedge5410.c |  3 +--
> > > >  arch/sh/drivers/heartbeat.c           | 32 +++-----------------------------
> > > >  arch/sh/kernel/time.c                 |  3 +--
> > > >  arch/sh/mm/asids-debugfs.c            |  5 +----
> > > >  4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > > 2.8.0
> > > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> -- 
> Yoshinori Sato
> <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-02 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-22 18:07 [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07 ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] sh: make time.c explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] sh: make mm/asids-debugfs " Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] sh: make board-secureedge5410 " Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] sh: make heartbeat driver " Paul Gortmaker
2016-04-22 18:07   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-05-26 16:45 ` [PATCH 0/4] sh: fix up modular use in non-modular code Paul Gortmaker
2016-05-26 16:45   ` Paul Gortmaker
2016-05-26 16:53   ` Rich Felker
2016-05-26 16:53     ` Rich Felker
2016-06-02  6:54     ` Yoshinori Sato
2016-06-02  6:54       ` Yoshinori Sato
2016-07-02 23:40       ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2016-07-02 23:40         ` Paul Gortmaker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160702234018.GU26134@windriver.com \
    --to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.