From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ppp: defer netns reference release for ppp channel
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 08:26:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160706082602.GM4666@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467781956-2229-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:12:36PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Matt reported that we have a NULL pointer dereference
> in ppp_pernet() from ppp_connect_channel(),
> i.e. pch->chan_net is NULL.
>
> This is due to that a parallel ppp_unregister_channel()
> could happen while we are in ppp_connect_channel(), during
> which pch->chan_net set to NULL. Since we need a reference
> to net per channel, it makes sense to sync the refcnt
> with the life time of the channel, therefore we should
> release this reference when we destroy it.
>
> Fixes: 1f461dcdd296 ("ppp: take reference on channels netns")
> Reported-by: Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> ---
Hi Cong! I may be wrong, but this doesn't look right in general.
We take the net in ppp_register_channel->ppp_register_net_channel
and (name) context implies that ppp_unregister_channel does
the reverse. Maybe there some sync point missed? I'll review
in detail a bit later.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis.co.nz,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] ppp: defer netns reference release for ppp channel
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 11:26:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160706082602.GM4666@uranus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467781956-2229-1-git-send-email-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:12:36PM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> Matt reported that we have a NULL pointer dereference
> in ppp_pernet() from ppp_connect_channel(),
> i.e. pch->chan_net is NULL.
>
> This is due to that a parallel ppp_unregister_channel()
> could happen while we are in ppp_connect_channel(), during
> which pch->chan_net set to NULL. Since we need a reference
> to net per channel, it makes sense to sync the refcnt
> with the life time of the channel, therefore we should
> release this reference when we destroy it.
>
> Fixes: 1f461dcdd296 ("ppp: take reference on channels netns")
> Reported-by: Matt Bennett <Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis.co.nz>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
> ---
Hi Cong! I may be wrong, but this doesn't look right in general.
We take the net in ppp_register_channel->ppp_register_net_channel
and (name) context implies that ppp_unregister_channel does
the reverse. Maybe there some sync point missed? I'll review
in detail a bit later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 5:12 [Patch net] ppp: defer netns reference release for ppp channel Cong Wang
2016-07-06 5:12 ` Cong Wang
2016-07-06 8:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2016-07-06 8:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-07-06 12:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-07-06 12:25 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-07-28 10:33 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-07-28 10:33 ` Guillaume Nault
2016-07-31 22:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-07-31 22:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2016-07-09 3:47 ` David Miller
2016-07-09 3:47 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160706082602.GM4666@uranus \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=Matt.Bennett@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.