From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
geoff@infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
james.morse@arm.com, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 1/8] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:17:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707011745.GX20774@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2543175.KeBui093Sr@hactar>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:11:45PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 06 Juli 2016, 16:52:19 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
> > On the startup of primary kernel, the memory region used by crash dump
> > kernel must be specified by "crashkernel=" kernel parameter.
> > reserve_crashkernel() will allocate and reserve the region for later use.
> >
> > User space tools, like kexec-tools, will be able to find that region
> > marked as "Crash kernel" in /proc/iomem.
>
> On powerpc, userspace tools get everything from the device tree (exposed to
> userspace in /proc/device-tree/), not /proc/iomem.
I started my kdump patches with arm (not arm64) implementation, and
so /proc/iomem is used for consistency. Since my kexec-tools (for arm64)
have to access /proc/iomem to identify usable memory regions on
*UEFI* systems anyway, I didn't think it was odd.
(Please note that UEFI won't expose memory regions information via
a device tree, but via ACPI table.)
> In the case of the crashkernel reserved region, that information is in
> /chosen/linux,crashkernel-base and /chosen/linux,crashkernel-size.
>
> Either way is fine I think. I'm just mentioning this for reference in case
> you want the ARM implementation to be closer to another arch which is also
> based on the device tree.
Adding those properties to a device tree is quite easy
(and it won't conflict with /proc/iomem), so I'd like
to defer to arm64 maintainers.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
> --
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> IBM Linux Technology Center
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v21 1/8] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 10:17:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160707011745.GX20774@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2543175.KeBui093Sr@hactar>
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 03:11:45PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 06 Juli 2016, 16:52:19 schrieb AKASHI Takahiro:
> > On the startup of primary kernel, the memory region used by crash dump
> > kernel must be specified by "crashkernel=" kernel parameter.
> > reserve_crashkernel() will allocate and reserve the region for later use.
> >
> > User space tools, like kexec-tools, will be able to find that region
> > marked as "Crash kernel" in /proc/iomem.
>
> On powerpc, userspace tools get everything from the device tree (exposed to
> userspace in /proc/device-tree/), not /proc/iomem.
I started my kdump patches with arm (not arm64) implementation, and
so /proc/iomem is used for consistency. Since my kexec-tools (for arm64)
have to access /proc/iomem to identify usable memory regions on
*UEFI* systems anyway, I didn't think it was odd.
(Please note that UEFI won't expose memory regions information via
a device tree, but via ACPI table.)
> In the case of the crashkernel reserved region, that information is in
> /chosen/linux,crashkernel-base and /chosen/linux,crashkernel-size.
>
> Either way is fine I think. I'm just mentioning this for reference in case
> you want the ARM implementation to be closer to another arch which is also
> based on the device tree.
Adding those properties to a device tree is quite easy
(and it won't conflict with /proc/iomem), so I'd like
to defer to arm64 maintainers.
Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI
> --
> []'s
> Thiago Jung Bauermann
> IBM Linux Technology Center
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-07 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-06 7:52 [PATCH v21 0/8] arm64: kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 1/8] arm64: kdump: reserve memory for crash dump kernel AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:00 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:00 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-07 0:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 0:19 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 18:11 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-06 18:11 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-07 1:17 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2016-07-07 1:17 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 2/8] arm64: limit memory regions based on DT property, usable-memory AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:48 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 3/8] arm64: kdump: implement machine_crash_shutdown() AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:28 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:28 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-07 0:43 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 0:43 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 16:42 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-07 16:42 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 4/8] arm64: kdump: add kdump support AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:38 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:38 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-07 0:49 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 0:49 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 5/8] arm64: kdump: add VMCOREINFO's for user-space coredump tools AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 6/8] arm64: kdump: enable kdump in the arm64 defconfig AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 7/8] arm64: kdump: update a kernel doc AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:44 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:44 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-07 0:51 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 0:51 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` [PATCH v21 8/8] Documentation: dt: usable-memory and elfcorehdr nodes for arm64 kexec AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 7:52 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-06 17:46 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 17:46 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-06 19:29 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-06 19:29 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-06 19:29 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-07 2:00 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 2:00 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 2:00 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-07 18:46 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-07 18:46 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-07 18:46 ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160707011745.GX20774@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=geoff@infradead.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.