Re: xenbits "official" repo for XTF (was Re: [PATCH 0/2] xtf: add launcher (+1 bugfix)

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>]

On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 07/07/16 12:10, Lars Kurth wrote:
> >> On 6 Jul 2016, at 15:22, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Looking at the above, it occurs to me that, this whole area seems to be a
> >>> little inconsistent anyway and could do with a little house-keeping. We
> >>> have
> >>> - osstest.git
> >>> - there also is osstest/*.git which seems to be odd and seems to have been
> >>> inactive for a while (not very clear to me what these do)
> >>> - and we have old and inactive xentesttools/*.git
> >> They are not inactive. I have some patches for it and we are using
> >> it (Boris and me).
> > That is good to know.
> >
> >>> - and we are adding a new repo for XTF
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Maybe, moving everything test related under testing/* or test/* would be
> >>> sensible, but that would cause some disruption (not sure how bad that
> >>> would be). It would address A, B and D. It wouldn't make C much worse than
> >>> now.
> >> I don't mind the xentesttools going under a 'test' directory. 
> > @Ian, @George: Any other views regarding say osstest and the other osstest/* directories? 
> >
> > @Andrew: would something like test/xtf.git work
> 
> It would, although given a straight choice I would prefer
> xen-test-framework.git over its abbreviation.

+1

> 
> ~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel