From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@google.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@rock-chips.com>,
Stephen Barber <smbarber@chromium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Ajit Pal Singh <ajitpal.singh@st.com>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
kernel@stlinux.com, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:02:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711070251.GA5823@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160709094718.GB6247@sirena.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2224 bytes --]
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator
> > patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take
> > the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet
> > another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch
> > from the regulator tree containing the above commit.
>
> Probably easiest to use this signed tag and resolve it in your tree:
>
> The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
>
> Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/pwm-modernization
>
> for you to fetch changes up to c2588393e6315ab68207323d37d2a73713d6bc81:
>
> regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode (2016-07-07 11:45:06 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> regulator: Provide a branch for moderninzation of the PWM code
>
> There's a new, improved PWM API which allows a lot of improvements in
> the PWM regulator driver. Since the bulk of the changes are in the PWM
> API this is being managed in the PWM tree, merge pending regulator API
> changes to allow this to be resolved more easily.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Alexandre Courbot (1):
> regulator: pwm: Support for enable GPIO
>
> Boris Brezillon (1):
> regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call
>
> Douglas Anderson (1):
> regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
>
> .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 7 +++-
> drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Merged into for-4.8/regulator of the PWM tree and rebased Boris'
pwm-regulator patches on top.
Boris, everything looks right to me, but can you take a quick look to
see if it all matches up with what you expect?
Thanks,
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:02:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160711070251.GA5823@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160709094718.GB6247@sirena.org.uk>
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 11:47:18AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2016 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > Mark, do you want me to provide a stable branch with the PWM regulator
> > patches and resolve that conflict in your tree? Or would you rather take
> > the whole set based on a stable branch from the PWM tree? Or maybe yet
> > another possibility would be to base the PWM tree on a stable branch
> > from the regulator tree containing the above commit.
>
> Probably easiest to use this signed tag and resolve it in your tree:
>
> The following changes since commit 1a695a905c18548062509178b98bc91e67510864:
>
> Linux 4.7-rc1 (2016-05-29 09:29:24 -0700)
>
> are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git tags/pwm-modernization
>
> for you to fetch changes up to c2588393e6315ab68207323d37d2a73713d6bc81:
>
> regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode (2016-07-07 11:45:06 +0200)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> regulator: Provide a branch for moderninzation of the PWM code
>
> There's a new, improved PWM API which allows a lot of improvements in
> the PWM regulator driver. Since the bulk of the changes are in the PWM
> API this is being managed in the PWM tree, merge pending regulator API
> changes to allow this to be resolved more easily.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Alexandre Courbot (1):
> regulator: pwm: Support for enable GPIO
>
> Boris Brezillon (1):
> regulator: pwm: Drop unneeded pwm_enable() call
>
> Douglas Anderson (1):
> regulator: pwm: Fix regulator ramp delay for continuous mode
>
> .../bindings/regulator/pwm-regulator.txt | 7 +++-
> drivers/regulator/pwm-regulator.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Merged into for-4.8/regulator of the PWM tree and rebased Boris'
pwm-regulator patches on top.
Boris, everything looks right to me, but can you take a quick look to
see if it all matches up with what you expect?
Thanks,
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160711/e970b6a6/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-14 9:13 [PATCH v3 00/14] regulator: pwm: various improvements Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] pwm: Add two helpers to ease relative duty cycle manipulation Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] pwm: rockchip: Fix period and duty_cycle approximation Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for hardware readout Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1465895602-31008-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 01/14] pwm: Add an helper to prepare a new PWM state Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] pwm: rockchip: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] pwm: rockchip: Add support for atomic update Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] pwm: sti: Avoid glitches on already running PWMs Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] regulator: pwm: Adjust PWM config at probe time Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] regulator: pwm: Switch to the atomic PWM API Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:30 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:30 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] regulator: pwm: Document pwm-dutycycle-unit and pwm-dutycycle-range Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-16 22:26 ` Rob Herring
2016-06-16 22:26 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-05 14:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:36 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] pwm: sti: Add support for hardware readout Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] regulator: pwm: Properly initialize the ->state field Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1465895602-31008-12-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-05 14:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:31 ` Mark Brown
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] regulator: pwm: Retrieve correct voltage Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-05 14:32 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:32 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-08 15:43 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-08 15:43 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-09 9:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-09 9:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-09 9:47 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-11 7:02 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2016-07-11 7:02 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-11 7:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-11 7:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-11 16:53 ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-11 16:53 ` Doug Anderson
2016-07-11 16:53 ` Doug Anderson
2016-06-14 9:13 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] regulator: pwm: Support extra continuous mode cases Boris Brezillon
2016-06-14 9:13 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <1465895602-31008-14-git-send-email-boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-05 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-05 14:34 ` Mark Brown
2016-07-08 16:35 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] regulator: pwm: various improvements Thierry Reding
2016-07-08 16:35 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160711070251.GA5823@ulmo.ba.sec \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ajitpal.singh@st.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@google.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@st.com \
--cc=milo.kim@ti.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=smbarber@chromium.org \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com \
--cc=wxt@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.