Re: Suggestion on labels of "Pre-BSD Routing Table" scaling figures

["Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:37:35PM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2016/07/13 1:34, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 12:32:01AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >>Hi Paul,
> >>
> >>Thanks to your addition in Chapter 9, it is getting more and more
> >>convincing.
> >
> >Glad you like them!  A little more to go...
> >
> >>However, the X-axis label in Figures 9.5, 9.9, and 9.16 is
> >>"Number of CPUs/Threads."
> >>At first glance, I read it as "Number of CPUs per Threads."
> >>It took a few seconds for me to realize that it means
> >>"Number of CPUs or Threads."
> >>
> >>In Figure 4.10, the x-axis label is "Number of CPUs (Threads)."
> >>I think this is better to avoid ambiguity.
> >>
> >>What do you think?
> >
> >Sold!!!  ;-)
> >
> >Made this change with your Signed-off-by.

Make that Reported-by...

> Hi,
> 
> So, I searched "CPUs/Threads" in the pdf and 10 other labels hit.
> See the list below. (Sorry, but with page numbers of 2 column pdf.)
> 
> * p.38 Figure 5.3
> * p.77 Figure 6.22
> * p.78 Figure 6.23 and in the text just below
> * p.166 Figures 10.7, 10.8, and 10.9
> * p.168 Figures 10.13 and 10.14
> * p.169 Figure 10.15
> * p.177 Figure 10.29
> 
> These figures existed before your recent rewrite of Chapter 9,
> and I never found them ambiguous. So I might have been on a
> different planet last night or something...
> If you think it is still better to modify them, please consider
> doing so.

Might as well...  Done!

> There is another "CPUs/Threads" in p.437 at the definition of
> "Linearizable," but it is not at all ambiguous in the context.

Fixed that one as well.

And added glossary.tex to the Makefile dependency list.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul