From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, Priit Laes <plaes@plaes.org>,
"John W . Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name dt property
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 16:45:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160717214502.GA11498@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3996482.D5xdKXDiGl@wuerfel>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:46:28AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:19:41 PM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > On 6-7-2016 15:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:08:55 AM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > All existing uses of the model property in arch/arm/boot/dts and most of
> > > the ones in arch/powerpc/boot/dts are against the intended usage in
> > > one way or another, but adding different kind of incorrect usage won't
> > > improve that.
> > >
> > > The only way I can see the model property being used correctly would
> > > be to have it match the first entry in the compatible property, but
> > > that is completely redundant, so we tend to omit it, except for the
> > > root node in which it is required. For the root node however, the
> > > historic practice that has crept in on ARM is to put something completely
> > > different in there, which is a human-readable description of the
> > > machine rather than something we can use as a unique indentifier.
> > >
> > > I'd just consider the "model" property burned, and not use it for anything
> > > that doesn't already use it, just like we handle "device_type": a few
> > > things require it, nothing else should use it.
> >
> > If that is the agreed approach in devicetree arena I am fine with it. I
> > have been unaware of this and just looked at the suggestion from Jonas
> > seeing a solution to the problem at hand.
>
> I don't think it has been discussed or decided before as the question
> has not come up, so for now this is my personal view. Maybe one of
> the devicetree maintainers can comment on this.
Back from vacation and getting caught up.
I agree with Arnd here. In my view model is the OEM branding on the
device, compatible is the h/w. If you have different firmware related
files, that goes beyond OEM branding.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name dt property
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 16:45:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160717214502.GA11498@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3996482.D5xdKXDiGl@wuerfel>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:46:28AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:19:41 PM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > On 6-7-2016 15:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:08:55 AM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > All existing uses of the model property in arch/arm/boot/dts and most of
> > > the ones in arch/powerpc/boot/dts are against the intended usage in
> > > one way or another, but adding different kind of incorrect usage won't
> > > improve that.
> > >
> > > The only way I can see the model property being used correctly would
> > > be to have it match the first entry in the compatible property, but
> > > that is completely redundant, so we tend to omit it, except for the
> > > root node in which it is required. For the root node however, the
> > > historic practice that has crept in on ARM is to put something completely
> > > different in there, which is a human-readable description of the
> > > machine rather than something we can use as a unique indentifier.
> > >
> > > I'd just consider the "model" property burned, and not use it for anything
> > > that doesn't already use it, just like we handle "device_type": a few
> > > things require it, nothing else should use it.
> >
> > If that is the agreed approach in devicetree arena I am fine with it. I
> > have been unaware of this and just looked at the suggestion from Jonas
> > seeing a solution to the problem at hand.
>
> I don't think it has been discussed or decided before as the question
> has not come up, so for now this is my personal view. Maybe one of
> the devicetree maintainers can comment on this.
Back from vacation and getting caught up.
I agree with Arnd here. In my view model is the OEM branding on the
device, compatible is the h/w. If you have different firmware related
files, that goes beyond OEM branding.
Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Arend Van Spriel
<arend.vanspriel-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Jonas Gorski
<jonas.gorski-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
Priit Laes <plaes-q/aMd4JkU83YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
"John W . Linville"
<linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend-dY08KVG/lbpWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens-jdAy2FN1RRM@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name dt property
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 16:45:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160717214502.GA11498@rob-hp-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3996482.D5xdKXDiGl@wuerfel>
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:46:28AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:19:41 PM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > On 6-7-2016 15:42, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 10:08:55 AM CEST Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > All existing uses of the model property in arch/arm/boot/dts and most of
> > > the ones in arch/powerpc/boot/dts are against the intended usage in
> > > one way or another, but adding different kind of incorrect usage won't
> > > improve that.
> > >
> > > The only way I can see the model property being used correctly would
> > > be to have it match the first entry in the compatible property, but
> > > that is completely redundant, so we tend to omit it, except for the
> > > root node in which it is required. For the root node however, the
> > > historic practice that has crept in on ARM is to put something completely
> > > different in there, which is a human-readable description of the
> > > machine rather than something we can use as a unique indentifier.
> > >
> > > I'd just consider the "model" property burned, and not use it for anything
> > > that doesn't already use it, just like we handle "device_type": a few
> > > things require it, nothing else should use it.
> >
> > If that is the agreed approach in devicetree arena I am fine with it. I
> > have been unaware of this and just looked at the suggestion from Jonas
> > seeing a solution to the problem at hand.
>
> I don't think it has been discussed or decided before as the question
> has not come up, so for now this is my personal view. Maybe one of
> the devicetree maintainers can comment on this.
Back from vacation and getting caught up.
I agree with Arnd here. In my view model is the OEM branding on the
device, compatible is the h/w. If you have different firmware related
files, that goes beyond OEM branding.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-17 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 151+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-29 14:04 [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name dt property Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: sun7i-a20-cubietruck: Set brcm,nvram_file_name Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 17:01 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 17:01 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 17:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: sun7i-a20-cubietruck: Set brcm, nvram_file_name Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 18:01 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: dts: sun7i-a20-cubietruck: Set brcm,nvram_file_name Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 18:01 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 18:01 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: sun7i-a20-wits-pro-a20-dkt: " Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: dts: sun7i-a20-wits-pro-a20-dkt: Set brcm, nvram_file_name Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: sun5i-a10s-auxtek-t004: Set brcm,nvram_file_name Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: sun5i-a10s-auxtek-t004: Set brcm, nvram_file_name Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 14:42 ` [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name dt property Jonas Gorski
2016-06-29 14:42 ` Jonas Gorski
2016-06-29 14:42 ` Jonas Gorski
2016-06-29 15:16 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 15:16 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 15:16 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 17:00 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 17:00 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 17:00 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 18:01 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 18:01 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 18:01 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-29 18:51 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-29 18:51 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-06-29 18:51 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-29 18:57 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-29 18:57 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-06-29 18:57 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-30 8:50 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 8:50 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 8:50 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-29 19:33 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-29 19:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-29 19:33 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-29 19:54 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Priit Laes
2016-06-29 19:54 ` Priit Laes
2016-06-29 19:54 ` [linux-sunxi] " Priit Laes
2016-06-29 20:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-29 20:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-29 20:07 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-30 9:02 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 9:02 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 9:02 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 9:50 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:50 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:50 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:58 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 9:58 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 9:58 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 10:04 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 10:04 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 10:04 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 10:18 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Jonas Gorski
2016-06-30 10:18 ` Jonas Gorski
2016-06-30 10:18 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Jonas Gorski
2016-06-30 10:25 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 10:25 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 10:25 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 11:31 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-30 11:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-30 11:31 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-06-30 19:23 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-30 19:23 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-06-30 19:23 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-01 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-01 8:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-01 8:51 ` [linux-sunxi] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-01 8:58 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Jonas Gorski
2016-07-01 8:58 ` Jonas Gorski
2016-07-01 8:58 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Jonas Gorski
2016-07-02 6:59 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-07-02 6:59 ` Kalle Valo
2016-07-02 6:59 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-07-02 18:20 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-02 18:20 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-02 18:20 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-02 21:30 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-02 21:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-02 21:30 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 8:41 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-04 8:41 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-04 8:41 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-04 8:55 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 8:55 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 8:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 9:08 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-04 9:08 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-04 9:08 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-04 14:54 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 14:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 14:54 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 18:36 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend van Spriel
2016-07-04 18:36 ` 'Arend van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-04 18:36 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend van Spriel
2016-07-05 13:43 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-05 13:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-05 13:43 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-06 8:08 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-06 8:08 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-06 8:08 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-06 13:42 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-06 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-06 13:42 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-06 19:19 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-06 19:19 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-06 19:19 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-07 8:46 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-07 8:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-07 8:46 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-07 9:16 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-07 9:16 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-07 9:16 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-07 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-07 9:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-07 9:24 ` [linux-sunxi] " Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-17 21:45 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2016-07-17 21:45 ` Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Rob Herring
2016-07-17 21:45 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Rob Herring
2016-07-18 7:51 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-18 7:51 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-18 7:51 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-30 8:46 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 8:46 ` Kalle Valo
2016-06-30 8:46 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <87mvm36p4d.fsf-HodKDYzPHsUD5k0oWYwrnHL1okKdlPRT@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-30 9:33 ` Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Julian Calaby
2016-06-30 9:49 ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:49 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:49 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:53 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:53 ` Hans de Goede
2016-06-30 9:53 ` [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm, nvram_file_name " Hans de Goede
2016-07-01 2:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] brcmfmac: Add brcm,nvram_file_name " Rob Herring
2016-07-01 2:08 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-01 2:08 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-01 8:17 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-01 8:17 ` 'Arend Van Spriel' via linux-sunxi
2016-07-01 8:17 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-07-01 9:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-01 9:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-01 9:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-04 16:12 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-04 16:12 ` Rob Herring
2016-07-04 16:12 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160717214502.GA11498@rob-hp-laptop \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jonas.gorski@gmail.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=plaes@plaes.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.