All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>,
	Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>,
	linux-pm <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
	Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] thermal: tango: add resume support
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:13:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718101338.GB422@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7689133.3ycKRvbtrh@wuerfel>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1932 bytes --]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:09:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 11:33:28 AM CEST Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tango_thermal_pm, NULL, tango_thermal_resume);
> > > +
> > > +#define DEV_PM_OPS   &tango_thermal_pm
> > > +#else
> > > +#define DEV_PM_OPS   NULL
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > In my experience it's often not useful to #ifdef the struct pm_ops.
> > These days you almost certainly want PM enabled, and the conditional
> > doesn't save you all that much in the first place, because it's not
> > unlikely for this to fit into some of the space that would be padded
> > out anyway.
> 
> This will also generate a warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set.
> Better write this as
> 
> #define DEV_PM_OPS (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) ? &tango_thermal_pm : NULL)
> 
> so the compiler can drop the variable definition when it's not
> needed.

My suggestion was to define tango_thermal_pm unconditionally to avoid
any of these tricks. For any real use-case in which the 92 bytes for the
struct dev_pm_ops would matter you most likely want PM_SLEEP anyway, so
I don't really see why we would even want to make it optional.

> > As a side-note, I've noticed that this driver has the following
> > dependencies:
> > 
> >         depends on ARCH_TANGO || COMPILE_TEST
> > 
> > which, last I checked, is probably going to fail on some architectures
> > because you need at least another one on HAS_IOMEM (for readl() and
> > writel()). That's a pre-existing problem, of course, so should be fixed
> > in a separate patch.
> 
> No need, we just merged a patch to no longer allow COMPILE_TEST on
> arch/um/, so we can safely rely on MMIO to be available for COMPILE_TEST.

I thought at least S390 didn't have readl() and writel() either, at
least when PCI wasn't enabled, or some such.

Thierry

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v2] thermal: tango: add resume support
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:13:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718101338.GB422@ulmo.ba.sec> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7689133.3ycKRvbtrh@wuerfel>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:09:39PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 11:33:28 AM CEST Thierry Reding wrote:
> 
> > > +
> > > +     return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(tango_thermal_pm, NULL, tango_thermal_resume);
> > > +
> > > +#define DEV_PM_OPS   &tango_thermal_pm
> > > +#else
> > > +#define DEV_PM_OPS   NULL
> > > +#endif
> > 
> > In my experience it's often not useful to #ifdef the struct pm_ops.
> > These days you almost certainly want PM enabled, and the conditional
> > doesn't save you all that much in the first place, because it's not
> > unlikely for this to fit into some of the space that would be padded
> > out anyway.
> 
> This will also generate a warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set.
> Better write this as
> 
> #define DEV_PM_OPS (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) ? &tango_thermal_pm : NULL)
> 
> so the compiler can drop the variable definition when it's not
> needed.

My suggestion was to define tango_thermal_pm unconditionally to avoid
any of these tricks. For any real use-case in which the 92 bytes for the
struct dev_pm_ops would matter you most likely want PM_SLEEP anyway, so
I don't really see why we would even want to make it optional.

> > As a side-note, I've noticed that this driver has the following
> > dependencies:
> > 
> >         depends on ARCH_TANGO || COMPILE_TEST
> > 
> > which, last I checked, is probably going to fail on some architectures
> > because you need at least another one on HAS_IOMEM (for readl() and
> > writel()). That's a pre-existing problem, of course, so should be fixed
> > in a separate patch.
> 
> No need, we just merged a patch to no longer allow COMPILE_TEST on
> arch/um/, so we can safely rely on MMIO to be available for COMPILE_TEST.

I thought at least S390 didn't have readl() and writel() either, at
least when PCI wasn't enabled, or some such.

Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160718/dca40322/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-28 11:37 [RESEND PATCH v2] thermal: tango: add resume support Mason
2016-06-28 11:37 ` Mason
2016-07-18  9:33 ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-18  9:33   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-18 10:09   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-18 10:09     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-18 10:13     ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2016-07-18 10:13       ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-18 11:10       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-18 11:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-18 11:28         ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-18 11:28           ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-18 12:21 ` [PATCH v3] " Mason
2016-07-18 12:21   ` Mason
2016-07-20 10:50   ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-20 10:50     ` Thierry Reding
2016-07-22 22:00   ` Kevin Hilman
2016-07-22 22:00     ` Kevin Hilman
2016-07-25  8:18     ` Mason
2016-07-25  8:18       ` Mason
2016-07-25  8:52       ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-25  8:52         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-25  9:48         ` Mason
2016-07-25  9:48           ` Mason
2016-07-26 12:13           ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-26 12:13             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-19 11:29             ` Zhang Rui
2016-08-19 11:29               ` Zhang Rui
2016-08-22 21:00               ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-22 21:00                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-24  8:25                 ` Zhang Rui
2016-08-24  8:25                   ` Zhang Rui
2016-08-24  8:32                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-24  8:32                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-24 15:12                     ` Mason
2016-08-24 15:12                       ` Mason
2016-09-02 13:17 ` [PATCH v4] " Marc Gonzalez
2016-09-02 13:17   ` Marc Gonzalez
2016-09-02 20:54   ` Kevin Hilman
2016-09-02 20:54     ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160718101338.GB422@ulmo.ba.sec \
    --to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=sf84@laposte.net \
    --cc=slash.tmp@free.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.