All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, vmscan: Release/reacquire lru_lock on pgdat change
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718235849.GB9161@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468853426-12858-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:50:25PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> With node-lru, the locking is based on the pgdat. As Minchan pointed
> out, there is an opportunity to reduce LRU lock release/acquire in
> check_move_unevictable_pages by only changing lock on a pgdat change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 45344acf52ba..a6f31617a08c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3775,24 +3775,24 @@ int page_evictable(struct page *page)
>  void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct page **pages, int nr_pages)
>  {
>  	struct lruvec *lruvec;
> -	struct zone *zone = NULL;
> +	struct pglist_data *pgdat = NULL;
>  	int pgscanned = 0;
>  	int pgrescued = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>  		struct page *page = pages[i];
> -		struct zone *pagezone;
> +		struct pglist_data *pagepgdat = page_pgdat(page);

No need to initialize in here.

>  
>  		pgscanned++;
> -		pagezone = page_zone(page);
> -		if (pagezone != zone) {
> -			if (zone)
> -				spin_unlock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> -			zone = pagezone;
> -			spin_lock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> +		pagepgdat = page_pgdat(page);

Double initialize. Please remove either one.

> +		if (pagepgdat != pgdat) {
> +			if (pgdat)
> +				spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
> +			pgdat = pagepgdat;
> +			spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>  		}
> -		lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, zone->zone_pgdat);
> +		lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
>  
>  		if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page))
>  			continue;
> @@ -3808,10 +3808,10 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct page **pages, int nr_pages)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (zone) {
> +	if (pgdat) {
>  		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED, pgrescued);
>  		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGSCANNED, pgscanned);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SHMEM */
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm, vmscan: Release/reacquire lru_lock on pgdat change
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 08:58:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160718235849.GB9161@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1468853426-12858-3-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:50:25PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> With node-lru, the locking is based on the pgdat. As Minchan pointed
> out, there is an opportunity to reduce LRU lock release/acquire in
> check_move_unevictable_pages by only changing lock on a pgdat change.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> ---
>  mm/vmscan.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 45344acf52ba..a6f31617a08c 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3775,24 +3775,24 @@ int page_evictable(struct page *page)
>  void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct page **pages, int nr_pages)
>  {
>  	struct lruvec *lruvec;
> -	struct zone *zone = NULL;
> +	struct pglist_data *pgdat = NULL;
>  	int pgscanned = 0;
>  	int pgrescued = 0;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
>  		struct page *page = pages[i];
> -		struct zone *pagezone;
> +		struct pglist_data *pagepgdat = page_pgdat(page);

No need to initialize in here.

>  
>  		pgscanned++;
> -		pagezone = page_zone(page);
> -		if (pagezone != zone) {
> -			if (zone)
> -				spin_unlock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> -			zone = pagezone;
> -			spin_lock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> +		pagepgdat = page_pgdat(page);

Double initialize. Please remove either one.

> +		if (pagepgdat != pgdat) {
> +			if (pgdat)
> +				spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
> +			pgdat = pagepgdat;
> +			spin_lock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>  		}
> -		lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, zone->zone_pgdat);
> +		lruvec = mem_cgroup_page_lruvec(page, pgdat);
>  
>  		if (!PageLRU(page) || !PageUnevictable(page))
>  			continue;
> @@ -3808,10 +3808,10 @@ void check_move_unevictable_pages(struct page **pages, int nr_pages)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (zone) {
> +	if (pgdat) {
>  		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGRESCUED, pgrescued);
>  		__count_vm_events(UNEVICTABLE_PGSCANNED, pgscanned);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(zone_lru_lock(zone));
> +		spin_unlock_irq(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>  	}
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SHMEM */
> -- 
> 2.6.4
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-18 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-18 14:50 [PATCH 0/3] Follow-up fixes to node-lru series v3 Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:50 ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm, vmscan: Remove redundant check in shrink_zones() Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:50   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 16:11   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 16:11     ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 23:54   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-18 23:54     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-18 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, vmscan: Release/reacquire lru_lock on pgdat change Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:50   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 16:13   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 16:13     ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 23:58   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2016-07-18 23:58     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-18 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, vmstat: remove zone and node double accounting by approximating retries -fix Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 14:50   ` Mel Gorman
2016-07-18 16:14   ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 16:14     ` Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 23:59   ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-18 23:59     ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-18 20:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Follow-up fixes to node-lru series v3 Johannes Weiner
2016-07-18 20:02   ` Johannes Weiner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160718235849.GB9161@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.