From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Linux Arch Mailing List <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8?
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:44:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160720074451.GB28606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUf_7=Tr4JrDj+3UPT5kUT1MsRtypvfqkOg_MVHAJu=PA@mail.gmail.com>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> Cons: It's a bit odd to merge code that can't be enabled as-is. OTOH
> x86 could plausibly enable it for 4.8 if Ingo is okay with applying
> "x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk()" and
> "x86: Move thread_info into task_struct" during the merge window after
> the -mm patchbomb lands.
There's quite a few risky stuff piled up already so I'd prefer if we delayed these
core bits and the enablement to v4.9.
We can carry these core bits in -tip as well, can create a tip:sched/thread_info
tree for it and such. I'd prefer that because this way we have natural proximity
between patch application, testing and eventual fixes.
Then we can expose -next to all these changes as a single, bisectable group of
commits and, should anything overly catastrophic happen, remove it and regroup our
forces.
This would really be the best approach I think, since I'd like to default-enable
all this on x86 from the very beginning.
Thanks,
Ingo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8?
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:44:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160720074451.GB28606@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUf_7=Tr4JrDj+3UPT5kUT1MsRtypvfqkOg_MVHAJu=PA@mail.gmail.com>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> Cons: It's a bit odd to merge code that can't be enabled as-is. OTOH
> x86 could plausibly enable it for 4.8 if Ingo is okay with applying
> "x86/dumpstack: Pin the target stack in save_stack_trace_tsk()" and
> "x86: Move thread_info into task_struct" during the merge window after
> the -mm patchbomb lands.
There's quite a few risky stuff piled up already so I'd prefer if we delayed these
core bits and the enablement to v4.9.
We can carry these core bits in -tip as well, can create a tip:sched/thread_info
tree for it and such. I'd prefer that because this way we have natural proximity
between patch application, testing and eventual fixes.
Then we can expose -next to all these changes as a single, bisectable group of
commits and, should anything overly catastrophic happen, remove it and regroup our
forces.
This would really be the best approach I think, since I'd like to default-enable
all this on x86 from the very beginning.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-20 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 23:47 Is THREAD_INFO_IN_TASK appropriate for -mm for 4.8? Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-18 23:47 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-19 8:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-19 8:25 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-07-25 14:26 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-07-25 14:26 ` Heiko Carstens
2016-07-19 11:22 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-19 11:22 ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-20 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2016-07-20 7:44 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160720074451.GB28606@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.