* coresight: next v4.7-rc5 @ 2016-07-25 16:17 ` Mathieu Poirier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Good day Greg, A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at them. Thanks, Mathieu [1]. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/30/533 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* coresight: next v4.7-rc5 @ 2016-07-25 16:17 ` Mathieu Poirier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 16:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Good day Greg, A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at them. Thanks, Mathieu [1]. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/30/533 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* coresight: next v4.7-rc5 2016-07-25 16:17 ` Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 20:36 ` Greg KH -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-07-25 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good day Greg, > > A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to > consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual > set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next > tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the > patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at > them. Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've been traveling since :( It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? thanks, and sorry about that. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: coresight: next v4.7-rc5 @ 2016-07-25 20:36 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-07-25 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > Good day Greg, > > A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to > consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual > set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next > tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the > patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at > them. Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've been traveling since :( It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? thanks, and sorry about that. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* coresight: next v4.7-rc5 2016-07-25 20:36 ` Greg KH @ 2016-07-25 21:44 ` Mathieu Poirier -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 25 July 2016 at 14:36, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> Good day Greg, >> >> A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to >> consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual >> set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next >> tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the >> patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at >> them. > > Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've > been traveling since :( > > It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get > into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should > get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? > > thanks, and sorry about that. Since there will be more patches for the 4.9 cycle, I suggest you forget about this set and I'll send another one that includes everything. > > greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: coresight: next v4.7-rc5 @ 2016-07-25 21:44 ` Mathieu Poirier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 25 July 2016 at 14:36, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: >> Good day Greg, >> >> A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to >> consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual >> set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next >> tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the >> patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at >> them. > > Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've > been traveling since :( > > It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get > into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should > get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? > > thanks, and sorry about that. Since there will be more patches for the 4.9 cycle, I suggest you forget about this set and I'll send another one that includes everything. > > greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* coresight: next v4.7-rc5 2016-07-25 21:44 ` Mathieu Poirier @ 2016-07-25 22:00 ` Greg KH -1 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-07-25 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:44:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 25 July 2016 at 14:36, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > >> Good day Greg, > >> > >> A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to > >> consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual > >> set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next > >> tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the > >> patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at > >> them. > > > > Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've > > been traveling since :( > > > > It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get > > into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should > > get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? > > > > thanks, and sorry about that. > > Since there will be more patches for the 4.9 cycle, I suggest you > forget about this set and I'll send another one that includes > everything. Ok, that's easy for me, now dropped from my to-apply mbox :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: coresight: next v4.7-rc5 @ 2016-07-25 22:00 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-07-25 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mathieu Poirier Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 03:44:18PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > On 25 July 2016 at 14:36, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:17:36AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote: > >> Good day Greg, > >> > >> A while back I sent a set of CoreSight related patches for you to > >> consider for the 4.8 cycle. Since then I haven't received the usual > >> set of emails telling me the patches have been added to your next > >> tree. With the merge window now being open I was wondering if the > >> patches have reached you and if you had the opportunity to look at > >> them. > > > > Yes, I got them, right on the day after I left for vacation, and I've > > been traveling since :( > > > > It missed 4.8, so unless these are bugfixes/regressions that need to get > > into 4.8, I'll queue them up for 4.9. If they are things that should > > get in, can you resend this as 2 series, one for 4.8 and one for 4.9? > > > > thanks, and sorry about that. > > Since there will be more patches for the 4.9 cycle, I suggest you > forget about this set and I'll send another one that includes > everything. Ok, that's easy for me, now dropped from my to-apply mbox :) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-25 22:00 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-07-25 16:17 coresight: next v4.7-rc5 Mathieu Poirier 2016-07-25 16:17 ` Mathieu Poirier 2016-07-25 20:36 ` Greg KH 2016-07-25 20:36 ` Greg KH 2016-07-25 21:44 ` Mathieu Poirier 2016-07-25 21:44 ` Mathieu Poirier 2016-07-25 22:00 ` Greg KH 2016-07-25 22:00 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.