From: jolsa@redhat.com (Jiri Olsa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 3/6] perf tools: add infrastructure for PMU specific configuration
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160727192639.GC23264@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkzr0iFFEUoeR8-58E02DyqdGndfNBL8v0tS2tQqBszN_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:59:50AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
SNIP
> > -PE_DRV_CFG_TERM
> > +'@' PE_NAME '=' PE_NAME
> > {
> > struct parse_events_term *term;
> >
> > ABORT_ON(parse_events_term__str(&term, PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_DRV_CFG,
> > - $1, $1, &@1, NULL));
> > + $2, $4, &@2, &@4));
> > $$ = term;
> > }
> >
>
> The problem here is that the correlation between the first and the
> second PE_NAME is lost and instead of seeing "PE_NAME=PE_NAME", the
> kernel only gets the value associated with the second PE_NAME.
>
> For example,
>
> -e event/@cfg1=value1, at cfg2=value2/ ...
>
> The above code will send "value1" and "value2" to the kernel driver
> where there is no way to know what configurable the values correspond
hum.. you get the 'cfg1' and 'cfg2' strings in $1 no?
jirka
> to. To go around that we'd have to concatenate $2 and $4 in function
> parse_events_term__str() (or new_term()) when @type_term ==
> PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_DRV_CFG, something that definitely looks
> hackish to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
jolsa@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] perf tools: add infrastructure for PMU specific configuration
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:26:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160727192639.GC23264@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANLsYkzr0iFFEUoeR8-58E02DyqdGndfNBL8v0tS2tQqBszN_A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:59:50AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
SNIP
> > -PE_DRV_CFG_TERM
> > +'@' PE_NAME '=' PE_NAME
> > {
> > struct parse_events_term *term;
> >
> > ABORT_ON(parse_events_term__str(&term, PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_DRV_CFG,
> > - $1, $1, &@1, NULL));
> > + $2, $4, &@2, &@4));
> > $$ = term;
> > }
> >
>
> The problem here is that the correlation between the first and the
> second PE_NAME is lost and instead of seeing "PE_NAME=PE_NAME", the
> kernel only gets the value associated with the second PE_NAME.
>
> For example,
>
> -e event/@cfg1=value1,@cfg2=value2/ ...
>
> The above code will send "value1" and "value2" to the kernel driver
> where there is no way to know what configurable the values correspond
hum.. you get the 'cfg1' and 'cfg2' strings in $1 no?
jirka
> to. To go around that we'd have to concatenate $2 and $4 in function
> parse_events_term__str() (or new_term()) when @type_term ==
> PARSE_EVENTS__TERM_TYPE_DRV_CFG, something that definitely looks
> hackish to me.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-27 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-20 20:38 [PATCH V2 0/6] perf: Driver specific configuration for PMU Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] perf/core: Adding PMU driver specific configuration Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] perf: Passing struct perf_event to function setup_aux() Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] perf tools: add infrastructure for PMU specific configuration Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 14:44 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 14:44 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 14:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 15:47 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 15:47 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-22 18:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-22 18:24 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-26 20:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-26 20:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-27 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-27 17:59 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-27 19:26 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2016-07-27 19:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-28 16:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-28 16:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] perf tools: pushing driver configuration down to the kernel Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-21 7:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2016-07-22 19:57 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-22 19:57 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] coresight: adding sink parameter to function coresight_build_path() Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 10:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-07-21 10:49 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-07-21 15:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-21 15:05 ` Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] coresight: etm-perf: incorporating sink definition from cmd line Mathieu Poirier
2016-07-20 20:38 ` Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160727192639.GC23264@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.