All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
To: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:31:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728040125.GA27150@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f352dcfc827a4cbb3878dd1043877a4154b1bd08.1469559530.git.geoff@infradead.org>

Hi Geoff,

On 26/07/2016:08:18:57 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> [Reworked and cleaned up]

You removed page_offset calculation in rework.
I am unable to understand that how arm64_mem.page_offset will be filled up now
for binary image case.

I think, we still need to keep page_offset user input. You may take following
two patches which does this, or you may leave binary image support patch which I
will send after your patches are merged.

https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/5b7e49a75d1d6cd4ac846f50ff10275fd54cb545
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/a0ce0ce673755c4061c1f081170a3a75dfa1d1fb

~Pratyush

> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> ---
>  kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> index 84386f7..cad7c73 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> @@ -24,21 +24,40 @@ int image_arm64_probe(const char *kernel_buf, off_t kernel_size)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	fprintf(stderr, "kexec: ARM64 binary image files are currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n");
> -
> -	return -1;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int image_arm64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *kernel_buf,
>  	off_t kernel_size, struct kexec_info *info)
>  {
> -	return -EFAILED;
> +	const struct arm64_image_header *h;
> +	unsigned long image_base;
> +
> +	h = (const struct arm64_image_header *)(kernel_buf);
> +
> +	if (arm64_process_image_header(h))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dbgprintf("%s: text_offset:   %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.text_offset);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: image_size:    %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.image_size);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: phys_offset:   %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.phys_offset);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: PE format:     %s\n", __func__,
> +		(arm64_header_check_pe_sig(h) ? "yes" : "no"));
> +
> +	image_base = get_phys_offset() + arm64_mem.text_offset;
> +	
> +	add_segment_phys_virt(info, kernel_buf, kernel_size, image_base,
> +		arm64_mem.image_size, 0);
> +
> +	return arm64_load_other_segments(info, image_base);
>  }
>  
>  void image_arm64_usage(void)
>  {
>  	printf(
>  "     An ARM64 binary image, compressed or not, big or little endian.\n"
> -"     Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n"
> -"     This file type is currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n\n");
> +"     Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n\n");
>  }
> -- 
> 2.5.0

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: panand@redhat.com (Pratyush Anand)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 09:31:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728040125.GA27150@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f352dcfc827a4cbb3878dd1043877a4154b1bd08.1469559530.git.geoff@infradead.org>

Hi Geoff,

On 26/07/2016:08:18:57 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
> From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
> [Reworked and cleaned up]

You removed page_offset calculation in rework.
I am unable to understand that how arm64_mem.page_offset will be filled up now
for binary image case.

I think, we still need to keep page_offset user input. You may take following
two patches which does this, or you may leave binary image support patch which I
will send after your patches are merged.

https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/5b7e49a75d1d6cd4ac846f50ff10275fd54cb545
https://github.com/pratyushanand/kexec-tools/commit/a0ce0ce673755c4061c1f081170a3a75dfa1d1fb

~Pratyush

> Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
> ---
>  kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> index 84386f7..cad7c73 100644
> --- a/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> +++ b/kexec/arch/arm64/kexec-image-arm64.c
> @@ -24,21 +24,40 @@ int image_arm64_probe(const char *kernel_buf, off_t kernel_size)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	fprintf(stderr, "kexec: ARM64 binary image files are currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n");
> -
> -	return -1;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  int image_arm64_load(int argc, char **argv, const char *kernel_buf,
>  	off_t kernel_size, struct kexec_info *info)
>  {
> -	return -EFAILED;
> +	const struct arm64_image_header *h;
> +	unsigned long image_base;
> +
> +	h = (const struct arm64_image_header *)(kernel_buf);
> +
> +	if (arm64_process_image_header(h))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	dbgprintf("%s: text_offset:   %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.text_offset);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: image_size:    %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.image_size);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: phys_offset:   %016lx\n", __func__,
> +		arm64_mem.phys_offset);
> +	dbgprintf("%s: PE format:     %s\n", __func__,
> +		(arm64_header_check_pe_sig(h) ? "yes" : "no"));
> +
> +	image_base = get_phys_offset() + arm64_mem.text_offset;
> +	
> +	add_segment_phys_virt(info, kernel_buf, kernel_size, image_base,
> +		arm64_mem.image_size, 0);
> +
> +	return arm64_load_other_segments(info, image_base);
>  }
>  
>  void image_arm64_usage(void)
>  {
>  	printf(
>  "     An ARM64 binary image, compressed or not, big or little endian.\n"
> -"     Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n"
> -"     This file type is currently NOT SUPPORTED.\n\n");
> +"     Typically an Image, Image.gz or Image.lzma file.\n\n");
>  }
> -- 
> 2.5.0

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-28  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-26 20:18 [PATCH v2 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] arm64: Add arm64 kexec support Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18   ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-28  4:10   ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-28  4:10     ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-28 17:33     ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-28 17:33       ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] kexec: Add common device tree routines Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18   ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] kexec: (bugfix) calc correct end address of memory ranges in device tree Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18   ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files Geoff Levand
2016-07-26 20:18   ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-28  4:01   ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2016-07-28  4:01     ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-28 18:04     ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-28 18:04       ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29  3:35       ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29  3:35         ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29 17:02         ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 17:02           ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 17:15           ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29 17:15             ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-29 17:19             ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 17:19               ` Geoff Levand
2016-08-04  4:51             ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-08-04  4:51               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-08-04  5:11               ` Pratyush Anand
2016-08-04  5:11                 ` Pratyush Anand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160728040125.GA27150@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=panand@redhat.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.