From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:21:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728202118.GI6682@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRGNgUeORYesjLAeaO=GGhC1rv9FUU5ZUdjRx8+Pz=vCggsEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 08:24:41PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr> wrote:
> > The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC is close enough to the AXP809 with some
> > more outputs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 32 ++++++++-
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 1 +
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +
> > drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 38 +++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > index 6d9ac76..c3287c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > @@ -467,7 +543,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > * name.
> > */
> > if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
> > - (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
> > + (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW) ||
> > + (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DC1SW)) {
>
> Are we getting to the point now where we need some other way to flag
> these? Maybe a set of flags per regulator?
I'd be inclined to say yes. We can also associate a structure to the
compatible, and store a bunch of infos there (like does it have a
DC1SW regulator in this case).
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160728/e3c453e7/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Cc: moinejf@free.fr, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
"Mailing List, Arm" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 22:21:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160728202118.GI6682@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGRGNgUeORYesjLAeaO=GGhC1rv9FUU5ZUdjRx8+Pz=vCggsEw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1842 bytes --]
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 08:24:41PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr> wrote:
> > The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC is close enough to the AXP809 with some
> > more outputs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 32 ++++++++-
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c | 1 +
> > drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +
> > drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h | 38 +++++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > index 6d9ac76..c3287c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > @@ -467,7 +543,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > * name.
> > */
> > if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
> > - (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
> > + (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW) ||
> > + (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DC1SW)) {
>
> Are we getting to the point now where we need some other way to flag
> these? Maybe a set of flags per regulator?
I'd be inclined to say yes. We can also associate a structure to the
compatible, and store a bunch of infos there (like does it have a
DC1SW regulator in this case).
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-28 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5799d673.58a51c0a.97cf9.b9c0SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@gmr-mx.google.com>
2016-07-28 10:24 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant Julian Calaby
2016-07-28 10:24 ` Julian Calaby
2016-07-28 20:21 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2016-07-28 20:21 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160728202118.GI6682@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.