All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:53:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803145301.GF32025@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470232224-9102-1-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:50:23AM -0400, Lyude wrote:
...
> +int
> +skl_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	int ret, result;
> +
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (!dev_priv->skl_sagv_enabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling the SAGV\n");
> +
> +	/* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */
> +	ret = wait_for(result = skl_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> +
> +	if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +		DRM_ERROR("Request to disable SAGV timed out\n");
> +	else {

I think you might have missed my note here on the last patch, but we
need to fix the minor coding style issue here (if either branch of an
if/else needs braces, you need to put them on both branches).

> +		if (result == 1)

As I mentioned before, the 1=off looks confusing if someone isn't
looking at the bspec carefully.  Using a #define for the various 0x1's
in this patch might help clarify the code slightly.

With those minor changes made,

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


Matt

> +			dev_priv->skl_sagv_enabled = false;
> +
> +		ret = result;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void
>  skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				   const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  				   struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */
> @@ -4236,6 +4346,8 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		/* Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off */
>  		memset(ddb, 0, sizeof(*ddb));
>  	}
> +
> +	skl_sagv_get_hw_state(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void ilk_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: Lyude <cpaul@redhat.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:53:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160803145301.GF32025@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470232224-9102-1-git-send-email-cpaul@redhat.com>

On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 09:50:23AM -0400, Lyude wrote:
...
> +int
> +skl_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> +{
> +	int ret, result;
> +
> +	if (IS_BROXTON(dev_priv))
> +		return 0;
> +	if (!dev_priv->skl_sagv_enabled)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> +	DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling the SAGV\n");
> +
> +	/* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */
> +	ret = wait_for(result = skl_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1);
> +	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
> +
> +	if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT)
> +		DRM_ERROR("Request to disable SAGV timed out\n");
> +	else {

I think you might have missed my note here on the last patch, but we
need to fix the minor coding style issue here (if either branch of an
if/else needs braces, you need to put them on both branches).

> +		if (result == 1)

As I mentioned before, the 1=off looks confusing if someone isn't
looking at the bspec carefully.  Using a #define for the various 0x1's
in this patch might help clarify the code slightly.

With those minor changes made,

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>


Matt

> +			dev_priv->skl_sagv_enabled = false;
> +
> +		ret = result;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void
>  skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
>  				   const struct intel_crtc_state *cstate,
>  				   struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc, /* out */
> @@ -4236,6 +4346,8 @@ void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev)
>  		/* Easy/common case; just sanitize DDB now if everything off */
>  		memset(ddb, 0, sizeof(*ddb));
>  	}
> +
> +	skl_sagv_get_hw_state(dev_priv);
>  }
>  
>  static void ilk_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-03 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-03 13:50 [PATCH v7] drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs Lyude
2016-08-03 13:50 ` Lyude
2016-08-03 14:31 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs (rev4) Patchwork
2016-08-03 14:53 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2016-08-03 14:53   ` [PATCH v7] drm/i915/skl: Add support for the SAGV, fix underrun hangs Matt Roper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160803145301.GF32025@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=cpaul@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.