All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: patrice.chotard@st.com
Cc: gnurou@gmail.com, amelie.delaunay@st.com, vireshk@kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, shawnguo@kernel.org,
	shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 07/10] gpio: stmpe: rework registers access
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:29:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810082954.GM1581@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470814755-19447-8-git-send-email-patrice.chotard@st.com>

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, patrice.chotard@st.com wrote:

> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> 
> This update allows to use registers map as following :
> regs[reg_index + offset] instead of
> regs[reg_index] + offset
> 
> This makes code clearer and will facilitate the addition of STMPE1600
> on which LSB and MSB registers are respectively located at addr and addr + 1.
> Despite for all others STMPE variant, LSB and MSB registers are respectively
> located in reverse order at addr + 1 and addr.
> 
> For variant which have 3 registers's bank, we use LSB,CSB and MSB indexes
> which contains respectively LSB (or LOW), CSB (or MID) and MSB (or HIGH)
> register addresses (STMPE1801/STMPE24xx).
> For variant which have 2 registers's bank, we use LSB and CSB indexes only.
> In this case the CSB index contains the MSB regs address (STMPE 1601).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> index 2789bdc..6d6d76a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>   */
>  enum { REG_RE, REG_FE, REG_IE };
>  
> +enum { LSB, CSB, MSB };
> +
>  #define CACHE_NR_REGS	3
>  /* No variant has more than 24 GPIOs */
>  #define CACHE_NR_BANKS	(24 / 8)
> @@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -56,7 +58,7 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int val)
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	int which = val ? STMPE_IDX_GPSR_LSB : STMPE_IDX_GPCR_LSB;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[which] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[which + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -74,7 +76,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	stmpe_gpio_set(chip, offset, val);
> @@ -87,7 +89,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	return stmpe_set_bits(stmpe, reg, mask, 0);
> @@ -157,10 +159,16 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
> -	static const u8 regmap[] = {
> -		[REG_RE]	= STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB,
> -		[REG_FE]	= STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB,
> -		[REG_IE]	= STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB,
> +	static const u8 regmap[CACHE_NR_REGS][CACHE_NR_BANKS] = {
> +		[REG_RE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB,
> +		[REG_RE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_CSB,
> +		[REG_RE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_MSB,
> +		[REG_FE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB,
> +		[REG_FE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_CSB,
> +		[REG_FE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_MSB,
> +		[REG_IE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB,
> +		[REG_IE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_CSB,
> +		[REG_IE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_MSB,
>  	};
>  	int i, j;
>  
> @@ -178,7 +186,7 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			stmpe_gpio->oldregs[i][j] = new;
> -			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[regmap[i]] - j, new);
> +			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[regmap[i][j]], new);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -214,9 +222,9 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	const char *label = gpiochip_is_requested(gc, offset);
> -	int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
>  	bool val = !!stmpe_gpio_get(gc, offset);
> -	u8 dir_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 bank = offset / 8;
> +	u8 dir_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + bank];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  	int ret;
>  	u8 dir;
> @@ -257,18 +265,16 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  		case STMPE1601:
>  		case STMPE2401:
>  		case STMPE2403:
> -			edge_det_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_MSB] +
> -				       num_banks - 1 - (offset / 8);
> +			edge_det_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + bank];
>  			ret = stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, edge_det_reg);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				return;
>  			edge_det = !!(ret & mask);
>  
>  		case STMPE1801:
> -			rise_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB] -
> -				   (offset / 8);
> -			fall_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB] -
> -				   (offset / 8);
> +			rise_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB + bank];
> +			fall_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB + bank];
> +
>  			ret = stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, rise_reg);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				return;
> @@ -279,8 +285,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  			fall = !!(ret & mask);
>  
>  		case STMPE801:
> -			irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB] -
> -				    (offset / 8);
> +			irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank];
>  			break;
>  
>  		default:
> @@ -362,8 +367,9 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>  		 */
>  		if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
>  			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]);
> -			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_MSB]
> -					+ i, status[i]);
> +			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe,
> +					stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],
> +					status[i]);
>  		}
>  	}
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND v2 07/10] gpio: stmpe: rework registers access
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 09:29:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810082954.GM1581@dell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470814755-19447-8-git-send-email-patrice.chotard@st.com>

On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, patrice.chotard at st.com wrote:

> From: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> 
> This update allows to use registers map as following :
> regs[reg_index + offset] instead of
> regs[reg_index] + offset
> 
> This makes code clearer and will facilitate the addition of STMPE1600
> on which LSB and MSB registers are respectively located at addr and addr + 1.
> Despite for all others STMPE variant, LSB and MSB registers are respectively
> located in reverse order at addr + 1 and addr.
> 
> For variant which have 3 registers's bank, we use LSB,CSB and MSB indexes
> which contains respectively LSB (or LOW), CSB (or MID) and MSB (or HIGH)
> register addresses (STMPE1801/STMPE24xx).
> For variant which have 2 registers's bank, we use LSB and CSB indexes only.
> In this case the CSB index contains the MSB regs address (STMPE 1601).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@st.com>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> index 2789bdc..6d6d76a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-stmpe.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
>   */
>  enum { REG_RE, REG_FE, REG_IE };
>  
> +enum { LSB, CSB, MSB };
> +
>  #define CACHE_NR_REGS	3
>  /* No variant has more than 24 GPIOs */
>  #define CACHE_NR_BANKS	(24 / 8)
> @@ -40,7 +42,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPMR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -56,7 +58,7 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int val)
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	int which = val ? STMPE_IDX_GPSR_LSB : STMPE_IDX_GPCR_LSB;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[which] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[which + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -74,7 +76,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	stmpe_gpio_set(chip, offset, val);
> @@ -87,7 +89,7 @@ static int stmpe_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
>  {
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
> -	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + (offset / 8)];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  
>  	return stmpe_set_bits(stmpe, reg, mask, 0);
> @@ -157,10 +159,16 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
> -	static const u8 regmap[] = {
> -		[REG_RE]	= STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB,
> -		[REG_FE]	= STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB,
> -		[REG_IE]	= STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB,
> +	static const u8 regmap[CACHE_NR_REGS][CACHE_NR_BANKS] = {
> +		[REG_RE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB,
> +		[REG_RE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_CSB,
> +		[REG_RE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPRER_MSB,
> +		[REG_FE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB,
> +		[REG_FE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_CSB,
> +		[REG_FE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_GPFER_MSB,
> +		[REG_IE][LSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB,
> +		[REG_IE][CSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_CSB,
> +		[REG_IE][MSB] = STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_MSB,
>  	};
>  	int i, j;
>  
> @@ -178,7 +186,7 @@ static void stmpe_gpio_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
>  				continue;
>  
>  			stmpe_gpio->oldregs[i][j] = new;
> -			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[regmap[i]] - j, new);
> +			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[regmap[i][j]], new);
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -214,9 +222,9 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  	struct stmpe_gpio *stmpe_gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>  	struct stmpe *stmpe = stmpe_gpio->stmpe;
>  	const char *label = gpiochip_is_requested(gc, offset);
> -	int num_banks = DIV_ROUND_UP(stmpe->num_gpios, 8);
>  	bool val = !!stmpe_gpio_get(gc, offset);
> -	u8 dir_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB] - (offset / 8);
> +	u8 bank = offset / 8;
> +	u8 dir_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPDR_LSB + bank];
>  	u8 mask = 1 << (offset % 8);
>  	int ret;
>  	u8 dir;
> @@ -257,18 +265,16 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  		case STMPE1601:
>  		case STMPE2401:
>  		case STMPE2403:
> -			edge_det_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_MSB] +
> -				       num_banks - 1 - (offset / 8);
> +			edge_det_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + bank];
>  			ret = stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, edge_det_reg);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				return;
>  			edge_det = !!(ret & mask);
>  
>  		case STMPE1801:
> -			rise_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB] -
> -				   (offset / 8);
> -			fall_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB] -
> -				   (offset / 8);
> +			rise_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPRER_LSB + bank];
> +			fall_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPFER_LSB + bank];
> +
>  			ret = stmpe_reg_read(stmpe, rise_reg);
>  			if (ret < 0)
>  				return;
> @@ -279,8 +285,7 @@ static void stmpe_dbg_show_one(struct seq_file *s,
>  			fall = !!(ret & mask);
>  
>  		case STMPE801:
> -			irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB] -
> -				    (offset / 8);
> +			irqen_reg = stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_IEGPIOR_LSB + bank];
>  			break;
>  
>  		default:
> @@ -362,8 +367,9 @@ static irqreturn_t stmpe_gpio_irq(int irq, void *dev)
>  		 */
>  		if (stmpe->partnum != STMPE801 || stmpe->partnum != STMPE1801) {
>  			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, statmsbreg + i, status[i]);
> -			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe, stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_MSB]
> -					+ i, status[i]);
> +			stmpe_reg_write(stmpe,
> +					stmpe->regs[STMPE_IDX_GPEDR_LSB + i],
> +					status[i]);
>  		}
>  	}
>  

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-10  8:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10  7:39 [RESEND v2 00/10] STMPE fixes/rework and add STMPE1600 support patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39 ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 01/10] mfd: stmpe: Add STMPE_IDX_SYS_CTRL/2 enum patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:28   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:28     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 02/10] mfd: stmpe: Add reset support for all STMPE variant patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:28   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:28     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 03/10] gpio: stmpe: fix edge and rising/falling edge detection patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:29   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:29     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 04/10] gpio: stmpe: write int status register only when needed patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:29   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:29     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 05/10] mfd: stmpe: use generic bit mask name patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:29   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:29     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 06/10] mfd: stmpe: rework registers access patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:29   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:29     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 07/10] gpio: " patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:29   ` Lee Jones [this message]
2016-08-10  8:29     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 08/10] Documentation: dt: add stmpe1600 compatible string to stmpe mfd patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:30   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:30     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 09/10] mfd: Add STMPE1600 support patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:30   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:30     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  7:39 ` [RESEND v2 10/10] gpio: stmpe: " patrice.chotard
2016-08-10  7:39   ` patrice.chotard at st.com
2016-08-10  8:30   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:30     ` Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:42 ` [GIT PULL] Immutable branch between MFD and GPIO due for v4.9 Lee Jones
2016-08-10  8:42   ` Lee Jones
2016-08-11 12:07   ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-11 12:07     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160810082954.GM1581@dell \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
    --cc=dinguyen@opensource.altera.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.