From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Krzysztof Kozłowski" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Baole Ni" <baolex.ni@intel.com>,
"Andrew Duggan" <aduggan@synaptics.com>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
dougthompson@xmission.com, chuansheng.liu@intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810135851.GA1607@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5052478.g1CZhtD17T@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 322 bytes --]
> > I assume Wolfram will merge this.
>
> I assume not, see http://lwn.net/Articles/696227/
Thanks for the pointer. I missed the discussion but came up with the
same conclusions: a) octals are easier to read and b) original author
should have asked if this change was feasible before posting 1285
patches :(
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810135851.GA1607@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5052478.g1CZhtD17T@wuerfel>
> > I assume Wolfram will merge this.
>
> I assume not, see http://lwn.net/Articles/696227/
Thanks for the pointer. I missed the discussion but came up with the
same conclusions: a) octals are easier to read and b) original author
should have asked if this change was feasible before posting 1285
patches :(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20160810/3b814757/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Baole Ni" <baolex.ni@intel.com>,
"Krzysztof Kozłowski" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Doug Anderson" <dianders@chromium.org>,
"Andrew Duggan" <aduggan@synaptics.com>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
dougthompson@xmission.com, chuansheng.liu@intel.com,
"Guenter Roeck" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 15:58:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160810135851.GA1607@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5052478.g1CZhtD17T@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 322 bytes --]
> > I assume Wolfram will merge this.
>
> I assume not, see http://lwn.net/Articles/696227/
Thanks for the pointer. I missed the discussion but came up with the
same conclusions: a) octals are easier to read and b) original author
should have asked if this change was feasible before posting 1285
patches :(
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-10 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-02 10:52 [PATCH 0244/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro Baole Ni
2016-08-02 10:52 ` Baole Ni
2016-08-02 10:52 ` Baole Ni
2016-08-10 13:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-10 13:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-10 13:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-08-10 13:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-10 13:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-10 13:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-08-10 13:58 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2016-08-10 13:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2016-08-10 13:58 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160810135851.GA1607@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=aduggan@synaptics.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=baolex.ni@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.