From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: andy.gross-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
david.brown-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org,
mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
pradeepb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
mmcclint-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
varada-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
ntelkar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the apss cpu pll divider clock node
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815223132.GN361@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466516962-18087-3-git-send-email-absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
On 06/21, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> index 17ca6d3..4c8a97f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static const char * const gcc_xo_ddr_500_200[] = {
> "xo",
> "gcc_fepll200_clk",
> "gcc_fepll500_clk",
> - "ddrpllapss",
> + "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> };
>
> #define F(f, s, h, m, n) { (f), (s), (2 * (h) - 1), (m), (n) }
> @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 apps_clk_src = {
> .parent_names = gcc_xo_ddr_500_200,
> .num_parents = 4,
> .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -1273,6 +1274,114 @@ static struct clk_pll_vco gcc_fepll_vco = {
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Round rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It Returns the input rate without changing it. The hardware supported rate
> + * will be calculated in set function by getting the same from frequency table.
> + */
> +static long clk_cpu_div_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *p_rate)
> +{
> + return rate;
This needs to calculate what the rate will be if clk_set_rate()
is called with the rate parameter. Blindly returning rate back is not
acceptable.
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock set rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It looks up the frequency table and updates the PLL divider to corresponding
> + * divider value.
> + */
> +static int clk_cpu_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + const struct freq_tbl *f;
> + u32 mask;
> + int ret;
> +
> + f = qcom_find_freq(rcg->freq_tbl, rate);
> + if (!f)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mask = (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1) << rcg->cdiv.shift;
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap,
> + rcg->cdiv.reg, mask,
> + (f->pre_div << rcg->cdiv.shift) & mask);
Why are we masking a value that will be masked by
regmap_update_bits()?
> + udelay(1);
Why do we wait? Please add some comment.
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock frequency calculation function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * This clock divider is nonlinear so this function calculates the actual
> + * divider and returns the output frequency by dividing VCO Frequency
> + * with this actual divider value.
> + */
> +static unsigned long clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + u32 cdiv, pre_div;
> +
> + regmap_read(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap, rcg->cdiv.reg, &cdiv);
> + cdiv = (cdiv >> rcg->cdiv.shift) & (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Some dividers have value in 0.5 fraction so multiply both VCO
> + * frequency(parent_rate) and pre_div with 2 to make integer
> + * calculation.
> + */
> + if (cdiv > 10)
> + pre_div = (cdiv + 1) * 2;
> + else
> + pre_div = cdiv + 12;
> +
> + return clk_calc_divider_rate(parent_rate * 2, pre_div);
> +};
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops = {
static?
> + .round_rate = clk_cpu_div_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_cpu_div_set_rate,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_apps_ddr_pll[] = {
> + {380000000, P_XO, 0xD, 0},
> + {409000000, P_XO, 0xC, 0, 0},
> + {444000000, P_XO, 0xB, 0, 0},
> + {484000000, P_XO, 0xA, 0, 0},
> + {507000000, P_XO, 0x9, 0, 0},
> + {532000000, P_XO, 0x8, 0, 0},
> + {560000000, P_XO, 0x7, 0, 0},
> + {592000000, P_XO, 0x6, 0, 0},
> + {626000000, P_XO, 0x5, 0, 0},
> + {666000000, P_XO, 0x4, 0, 0},
> + {710000000, P_XO, 0x3, 0, 0},
> + {761000000, P_XO, 0x2, 0, 0},
> + {819000000, P_XO, 0x1, 0, 0},
> + {888000000, P_XO, 0x0, 0, 0},
Style nits from before apply here (lowercase, spaces)
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll_div gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk = {
> + .cdiv.reg = 0x2E020,
> + .cdiv.shift = 4,
> + .cdiv.width = 4,
> + .cdiv.clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x2E000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> + "gcc_apps_ddrpll_vco",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops,
> + },
> + },
> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_apps_ddr_pll,
> +};
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
Cc: andy.gross@linaro.org, david.brown@linaro.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, mturquette@baylibre.com,
galak@codeaurora.org, pradeepb@codeaurora.org,
mmcclint@codeaurora.org, varada@codeaurora.org,
sricharan@codeaurora.org, architt@codeaurora.org,
ntelkar@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the apss cpu pll divider clock node
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 15:31:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160815223132.GN361@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466516962-18087-3-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org>
On 06/21, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> index 17ca6d3..4c8a97f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-ipq4019.c
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static const char * const gcc_xo_ddr_500_200[] = {
> "xo",
> "gcc_fepll200_clk",
> "gcc_fepll500_clk",
> - "ddrpllapss",
> + "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> };
>
> #define F(f, s, h, m, n) { (f), (s), (2 * (h) - 1), (m), (n) }
> @@ -571,6 +571,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 apps_clk_src = {
> .parent_names = gcc_xo_ddr_500_200,
> .num_parents = 4,
> .ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
> + .flags = CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> },
> };
>
> @@ -1273,6 +1274,114 @@ static struct clk_pll_vco gcc_fepll_vco = {
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Round rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It Returns the input rate without changing it. The hardware supported rate
> + * will be calculated in set function by getting the same from frequency table.
> + */
> +static long clk_cpu_div_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long *p_rate)
> +{
> + return rate;
This needs to calculate what the rate will be if clk_set_rate()
is called with the rate parameter. Blindly returning rate back is not
acceptable.
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock set rate function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * It looks up the frequency table and updates the PLL divider to corresponding
> + * divider value.
> + */
> +static int clk_cpu_div_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + const struct freq_tbl *f;
> + u32 mask;
> + int ret;
> +
> + f = qcom_find_freq(rcg->freq_tbl, rate);
> + if (!f)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mask = (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1) << rcg->cdiv.shift;
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap,
> + rcg->cdiv.reg, mask,
> + (f->pre_div << rcg->cdiv.shift) & mask);
Why are we masking a value that will be masked by
regmap_update_bits()?
> + udelay(1);
Why do we wait? Please add some comment.
> +
> + return 0;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Clock frequency calculation function for APPS CPU PLL Clock divider.
> + * This clock divider is nonlinear so this function calculates the actual
> + * divider and returns the output frequency by dividing VCO Frequency
> + * with this actual divider value.
> + */
> +static unsigned long clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
> + unsigned long parent_rate)
> +{
> + struct clk_pll_div *rcg = to_clk_pll_div(hw);
> + u32 cdiv, pre_div;
> +
> + regmap_read(rcg->cdiv.clkr.regmap, rcg->cdiv.reg, &cdiv);
> + cdiv = (cdiv >> rcg->cdiv.shift) & (BIT(rcg->cdiv.width) - 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Some dividers have value in 0.5 fraction so multiply both VCO
> + * frequency(parent_rate) and pre_div with 2 to make integer
> + * calculation.
> + */
> + if (cdiv > 10)
> + pre_div = (cdiv + 1) * 2;
> + else
> + pre_div = cdiv + 12;
> +
> + return clk_calc_divider_rate(parent_rate * 2, pre_div);
> +};
> +
> +const struct clk_ops clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops = {
static?
> + .round_rate = clk_cpu_div_round_rate,
> + .set_rate = clk_cpu_div_set_rate,
> + .recalc_rate = clk_cpu_div_recalc_rate,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct freq_tbl ftbl_apps_ddr_pll[] = {
> + {380000000, P_XO, 0xD, 0},
> + {409000000, P_XO, 0xC, 0, 0},
> + {444000000, P_XO, 0xB, 0, 0},
> + {484000000, P_XO, 0xA, 0, 0},
> + {507000000, P_XO, 0x9, 0, 0},
> + {532000000, P_XO, 0x8, 0, 0},
> + {560000000, P_XO, 0x7, 0, 0},
> + {592000000, P_XO, 0x6, 0, 0},
> + {626000000, P_XO, 0x5, 0, 0},
> + {666000000, P_XO, 0x4, 0, 0},
> + {710000000, P_XO, 0x3, 0, 0},
> + {761000000, P_XO, 0x2, 0, 0},
> + {819000000, P_XO, 0x1, 0, 0},
> + {888000000, P_XO, 0x0, 0, 0},
Style nits from before apply here (lowercase, spaces)
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_pll_div gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk = {
> + .cdiv.reg = 0x2E020,
> + .cdiv.shift = 4,
> + .cdiv.width = 4,
> + .cdiv.clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x2E000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_apps_cpu_plldiv_clk",
> + .parent_names = (const char *[]){
> + "gcc_apps_ddrpll_vco",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_regmap_cpu_div_ops,
> + },
> + },
> + .freq_tbl = ftbl_apps_ddr_pll,
> +};
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-15 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 13:49 [PATCH v2 0/5] Patches for QCOM IPQ4019 clock driver Abhishek Sahu
[not found] ` <1466516962-18087-1-git-send-email-absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the clock nodes and operations for pll Abhishek Sahu
2016-06-21 13:49 ` Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:19 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the apss cpu pll divider clock node Abhishek Sahu
[not found] ` <1466516962-18087-3-git-send-email-absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-15 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-08-15 22:31 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the nodes for pcnoc Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the all frequencies for apps cpu Abhishek Sahu
2016-08-15 22:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-06-21 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: qcom: ipq4019: Added the cpu clock frequency change notifier Abhishek Sahu
[not found] ` <1466516962-18087-6-git-send-email-absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-15 22:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-15 22:26 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160815223132.GN361@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd-sgv2jx0feol9jmxxk+q4oq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=absahu-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=andy.gross-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david.brown-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-clk-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mmcclint-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mturquette-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ntelkar-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=pradeepb-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sricharan-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=varada-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.