From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Benoit Goby <benoit@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] PM / sleep: Expose DPM watchdog timeout to sysfs
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 00:32:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160818223226.GA5055@amd> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0joOobOPUT21M=A-=B7FD3D=08VJbt+k+9wXwwT7jiMVw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi!
> >> > > +++ linux/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> >> > > @@ -2749,6 +2749,8 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes
> >> > > nowatchdog [KNL] Disable both lockup detectors, i.e.
> >> > > soft-lockup and NMI watchdog (hard-lockup).
> >> > >
> >> > > + no_dpm_watchdog [KNL] Disable the device suspend/resume
> >> > watchdog.
> >> > > +
> >> > > nowb [ARM]
> >> > >
> >> > > nox2apic [X86-64,APIC] Do not enable x2APIC mode.
> >> >
> >> > Do we really need the new cmdline option? Can we just tell people to disable
> >> > DPM_WATCHDOG completely?
> >> >
> >> > Is there reason to keep the DPM_WATCHDOG? Did it find some real bugs lately?
> >> >
> >> We can tell users to disable the DPM_WATCHDOG, maybe some android people would like
> >> to use this feature to track/confirm hardware/firmware issues.
> >> I'm ok with only adjusting the timeout from 60 to 120.
> >
> > I believe that's the best solution for now. (Android people often
> > claim commandline is hard for them to use...)
>
> So maybe DPM_WATCHDOG should depend on EXPERT?
I'd say so, yes.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-19 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-11 12:29 [PATCH 0/2][RFC] PM / sleep: Expose DPM watchdog timeout to sysfs Chen Yu
2016-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH 1/2][RFC] PM / sleep: Make DPM watchdog depend on PM_SLEEP Chen Yu
2016-08-12 0:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-11 12:29 ` [PATCH 2/2][RFC] PM / sleep: Expose DPM watchdog timeout to sysfs Chen Yu
2016-08-11 18:54 ` [PATCH 0/2][RFC] " Pavel Machek
2016-08-12 0:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-12 2:52 ` Chen Yu
2016-08-12 6:33 ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-12 10:49 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-08-12 11:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-17 3:43 ` Chen Yu
2016-08-18 12:06 ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-18 17:44 ` Chen, Yu C
2016-08-18 18:42 ` Pavel Machek
2016-08-18 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-18 22:32 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160818223226.GA5055@amd \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=benoit@android.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.