From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:52:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160827005257.GD88444@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=cRTNtND+5f83p_yBecnx0iB5_6Q6xzbHdeY0tgrVaMRLSRQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0700, huang ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Kim,
> >>
> >> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >> >>
> >> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
> >> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7. We
> >> > will implement it.
> >> >
> >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> >
> >> > The disk is one 48G ram disk. The steps for aim7 is,
> >> >
> >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> >> > FILESIZE: 1M
> >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> >> > 10 disk_cp
> >> > EOF
> >> >
> >> > (
> >> > echo $HOSTNAME
> >> > echo disk_cp
> >> >
> >> > echo 1
> >> > echo 3000
> >> > echo 2
> >> > echo 3000
> >> > echo 1
> >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >> >
> >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The
> >> > steps for aim7 is,
> >> >
> >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> >> > FILESIZE: 1M
> >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> >> > 10 sync_disk_rw
> >> > EOF
> >> >
> >> > (
> >> > echo $HOSTNAME
> >> > echo sync_disk_rw
> >> >
> >> > echo 1
> >> > echo 600
> >> > echo 2
> >> > echo 600
> >> > echo 1
> >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >>
> >> Any update on these 2 regressions? Is the information is enough for you
> >> to reproduce?
> >
> > Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
> > I'll check that when back to US.
>
> Any update?
Sorry, how can I get multitask binary?
Thanks,
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec -36.3% regression
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:52:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160827005257.GD88444@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC=cRTNtND+5f83p_yBecnx0iB5_6Q6xzbHdeY0tgrVaMRLSRQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2033 bytes --]
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 09:51:11AM -0700, huang ying wrote:
> Hi, Jaegeuk,
>
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 03:49:41PM -0700, Huang, Ying wrote:
> >> Hi, Kim,
> >>
> >> "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> writes:
> >> >>
> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> >> [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >> >>
> >> >> In terms of the above regression, I could check that _reproduce_ procedure
> >> >> includes mounting filesystem only. Is that correct?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry, our test system failed to generate reproduce steps for aim7. We
> >> > will implement it.
> >> >
> >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] 3bdad3c7ee: aim7.jobs-per-min -25.3% regression
> >> >
> >> > The disk is one 48G ram disk. The steps for aim7 is,
> >> >
> >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> >> > FILESIZE: 1M
> >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> >> > 10 disk_cp
> >> > EOF
> >> >
> >> > (
> >> > echo $HOSTNAME
> >> > echo disk_cp
> >> >
> >> > echo 1
> >> > echo 3000
> >> > echo 2
> >> > echo 3000
> >> > echo 1
> >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > - [lkp] [f2fs] b93f771286: aim7.jobs-per-min -81.2% regression
> >> >
> >> > The disk is 4 12G ram disk, and setup RAID0 on them via mdadm. The
> >> > steps for aim7 is,
> >> >
> >> > cat > workfile <<EOF
> >> > FILESIZE: 1M
> >> > POOLSIZE: 10M
> >> > 10 sync_disk_rw
> >> > EOF
> >> >
> >> > (
> >> > echo $HOSTNAME
> >> > echo sync_disk_rw
> >> >
> >> > echo 1
> >> > echo 600
> >> > echo 2
> >> > echo 600
> >> > echo 1
> >> > ) | ./multitask -t &
> >>
> >> Any update on these 2 regressions? Is the information is enough for you
> >> to reproduce?
> >
> > Sorry, I've had no time to dig this due to business travel now.
> > I'll check that when back to US.
>
> Any update?
Sorry, how can I get multitask binary?
Thanks,
>
> Best Regards,
> Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-27 0:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-18 2:09 [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.app_overhead -36.3% regression kernel test robot
2016-07-18 2:09 ` kernel test robot
2016-07-18 2:09 ` kernel test robot
2016-07-18 20:27 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-07-18 20:27 ` Huang, Ying
2016-07-18 20:27 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] [f2fs] ec795418c4: fsmark.files_per_sec " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:00 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:00 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:24 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 17:24 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 17:24 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 17:44 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:44 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 17:44 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 18:52 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 18:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-04 20:36 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 20:36 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-04 20:36 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 22:49 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 22:49 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-11 22:49 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-12 1:22 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-12 1:22 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-24 16:51 ` [LKP] [lkp] " huang ying
2016-08-24 16:51 ` huang ying
2016-08-27 0:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-08-27 0:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-27 2:13 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Fengguang Wu
2016-08-27 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-27 2:13 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-08-30 2:30 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-30 2:30 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-08-30 16:44 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-08-30 16:44 ` Huang, Ying
2016-08-30 16:44 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 6:26 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 6:26 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 6:26 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-26 18:23 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-09-26 18:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-09-27 0:50 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-09-27 0:50 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-27 0:50 ` Huang, Ying
2016-09-27 1:41 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-09-27 1:41 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-09-27 1:41 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-31 3:14 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-10-31 3:14 ` Huang, Ying
2016-10-31 3:14 ` Huang, Ying
2016-10-31 17:42 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-31 17:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-31 17:42 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160827005257.GD88444@jaegeuk \
--to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.