From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fadump: Register the memory reserved by fadump
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:42:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829131246.GA2505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804140133.edf295b8263845e50c185fc2@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2016-08-04 14:01:33]:
> > Register the memory reserved by fadump, so that the cache sizes are
> > calculated based on the free memory (i.e Total memory - reserved
> > memory).
>
> Looks harmless enough to me. I'll schedule the patches for 4.8. But
> it sounds like they should be backported into older kernels?
>
Based on the v2 feedback, I just posted a v3 at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472476010-4709-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
that tries to reduce the large system hash based on tha reserved memory.
Hence please drop the v2 patches.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] fadump: Register the memory reserved by fadump
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 18:42:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160829131246.GA2505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804140133.edf295b8263845e50c185fc2@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2016-08-04 14:01:33]:
> > Register the memory reserved by fadump, so that the cache sizes are
> > calculated based on the free memory (i.e Total memory - reserved
> > memory).
>
> Looks harmless enough to me. I'll schedule the patches for 4.8. But
> it sounds like they should be backported into older kernels?
>
Based on the v2 feedback, I just posted a v3 at
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1472476010-4709-1-git-send-email-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
that tries to reduce the large system hash based on tha reserved memory.
Hence please drop the v2 patches.
--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-29 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 17:12 [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/page_alloc: Replace set_dma_reserve to set_memory_reserve Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 17:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 17:12 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] fadump: Register the memory reserved by fadump Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 17:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-04 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-04 21:01 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-29 13:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2016-08-29 13:12 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 6:45 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] mm/page_alloc: Replace set_dma_reserve to set_memory_reserve Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-05 6:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-05 7:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 7:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 9:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-05 9:09 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-08-05 6:47 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-05 6:47 ` Mel Gorman
2016-08-05 7:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2016-08-05 7:36 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160829131246.GA2505@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.