From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: vijay.kilari@gmail.com
Cc: marc.zyngier@arm.com, Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement VGICv3 CPU interface access
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:45:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160830134514.GJ10162@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472037609-4164-5-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0530, vijay.kilari@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>
>
> VGICv3 CPU interface registers are accessed using
> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS ioctl. These registers are accessed
> as 64-bit. The cpu MPIDR value is passed along with register id.
> is used to identify the cpu for registers access.
>
> The version of VGIC v3 specification is define here
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-July/445611.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 15 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 4 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 29 +++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 4 +-
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 6 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 6 +
> 8 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 94ea676..b13c944 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -182,14 +182,14 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_ ## n ## _MASK)
>
> #define __ARM64_SYS_REG(op0,op1,crn,crm,op2) \
> - (KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG | \
> - ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op0, OP0) | \
> + (ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op0, OP0) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op1, OP1) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(crn, CRN) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(crm, CRM) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op2, OP2))
eh, no, please don't modify an exported userspace API header file in
this way.
If you want to reuse this, then add a new define for the sysreg field
generators and call that from __ARM64_SYS_REG() and from
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG.
>
> -#define ARM64_SYS_REG(...) (__ARM64_SYS_REG(__VA_ARGS__) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64)
> +#define ARM64_SYS_REG(...) (__ARM64_SYS_REG(__VA_ARGS__) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG)
>
> #define KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CTL ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 3, 1)
> #define KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 3, 2)
> @@ -208,7 +208,16 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS 3
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL 4
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS 5
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS 6
> +
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT 0
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP0_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP1_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRN_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_MASK)
we didn't need this for the existing userspace to kernel sysreg
interface, why do we need this now, and even need to export it to
userspace?
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2) \
> + __ARM64_SYS_REG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2)
>
> /* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL 0
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index 695eb3c..dafbd0e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -31,5 +31,6 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index 56b0b7e..164463b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,10 @@
>
> #define ICH_VMCR_CTLR_SHIFT 0
> #define ICH_VMCR_CTLR_MASK (0x21f << ICH_VMCR_CTLR_SHIFT)
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT 0
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0 (1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT)
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT 1
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1 (1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT)
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT 18
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_MASK (7 << ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT)
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT 21
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index 06f0158..74e5c38 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,15 @@ static int vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(struct kvm_device *dev,
> if (!is_write)
> *reg = tmp32;
> break;
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 regid;
> +
> + regid = (attr->attr & KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK) |
> + KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
I think the simpler way, which is analogous to what the other sysreg
access functions do, it so simply define a mask fort the 'instr' field
(0xffff) and let the lookup function worry about the individual fields.
> + ret = vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(vcpu, is_write,
> + regid, reg);
> + break;
> + }
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> @@ -533,6 +542,15 @@ static int vgic_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> reg = tmp32;
> return vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, true);
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, true);
> + }
> }
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> @@ -560,6 +578,16 @@ static int vgic_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> ret = put_user(tmp32, uaddr);
> return ret;
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + ret = vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, false);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = put_user(reg, uaddr);
> + return ret;
nit: you can just do 'return put_user(reg, uaddr);'
> + }
> }
>
> return -ENXIO;
> @@ -578,6 +606,7 @@ static int vgic_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> break;
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS:
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS:
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS:
> return vgic_v3_has_attr_regs(dev, attr);
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS:
> return 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> index cd37159..4a35eb8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_sgipends(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> -static void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> +void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> {
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_set_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> vgic_v3_set_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> }
>
> -static void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> +void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> {
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_get_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index c2df103..61abea0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> #include "vgic.h"
> #include "vgic-mmio.h"
> +#include "sys_regs.h"
>
> /* extract @num bytes at @offset bytes offset in data */
> unsigned long extract_bytes(unsigned long data, unsigned int offset,
> @@ -598,6 +599,11 @@ int vgic_v3_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_rdbase_registers);
> break;
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + return vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(vcpu, 0, cpuid, ®);
> + }
> default:
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..581d053
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <kvm/iodev.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +
> +#include "vgic.h"
> +#include "vgic-mmio.h"
> +#include "sys_regs.h"
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ctlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.ctlr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.ctlr;
> + }
> +
really? Have you looked at the spec and implementation of this or did
you just copy the v2 code?
The ICH_VMCR_EL2 register field mappings are not identical to the ctlr
mappings. I think this causes some rework for much of this patch, so
I'll have a look at the next revision.
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_pmr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.pmr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.pmr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_bpr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.bpr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.bpr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_bpr1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.abpr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.abpr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_grpen0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr &= ~ICH_VMCR_ENG0;
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr |= (p->regval << ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT) &
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG0;
> + } else {
> + p->regval = (vgicv3->vgic_vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG0) >>
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT;
> + }
so for example, why shouldn't these go through the vgic_set/get_vmcr
wrappers?
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_grpen1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr &= ~ICH_VMCR_ENG1;
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr |= (p->regval << ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT) &
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG1;
> + } else {
> + p->regval = (vgicv3->vgic_vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG1) >>
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ap0r(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> + u8 idx = r->Op2 & 3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vgicv3->vgic_ap0r[idx] = p->regval;
> + else
> + p->regval = vgicv3->vgic_ap0r[idx];
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ap1r(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> + u8 idx = r->Op2 & 3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vgicv3->vgic_ap1r[idx] = p->regval;
> + else
> + p->regval = vgicv3->vgic_ap1r[idx];
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct sys_reg_desc gic_v3_icc_reg_descs[] = {
> + /* ICC_PMR_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(4), CRm(6), Op2(0), access_gic_pmr },
> + /* ICC_BPR0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr0 },
> + /* ICC_AP0R0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(4), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(5), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R2_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(6), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R3_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(7), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(0), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(1), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R2_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(2), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R3_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(3), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_BPR1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr1 },
> + /* ICC_CTLR_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(4), access_gic_ctlr },
> + /* ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(6), access_gic_grpen0 },
> + /* ICC_GRPEN1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(7), access_gic_grpen1 },
Do we need to allow userspace to at least read ICC_SRE_EL1?
Should we verify that the DIB and FDB fields of that register are
written as the system understands them (clear, WI)?
> +};
> +
> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg)
> +{
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> +
> + params.regval = le64_to_cpu(*reg);
> + params.is_write = is_write;
> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
> + params.is_32bit = false;
> +
> + return find_reg_by_id(id, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs)) ?
> + 0 : -ENXIO;
this looks terrible, please rewrite without the ternary operator.
> +}
> +
> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg)
> +{
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
> +
> + if (is_write)
> + params.regval = le64_to_cpu(*reg);
why do we need this conversion here?
> + params.is_write = is_write;
> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
> + params.is_32bit = false;
> +
> + r = find_reg_by_id(id, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs));
> + if (!r)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if (!r->access(vcpu, ¶ms, r))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!is_write)
> + *reg = cpu_to_le64(params.regval);
same question as above
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 14e4ce5..20eab36c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ int vgic_v3_dist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> int offset, u32 *val);
> int vgic_v3_redist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> int offset, u32 *val);
> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> + u64 id, u64 *val);
> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg);
> #else
> static inline void vgic_v3_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> @@ -169,6 +173,8 @@ static inline int vgic_its_inject_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
> #endif
>
> int kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type);
> +void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> +void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> int vgic_lazy_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement VGICv3 CPU interface access
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:45:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160830134514.GJ10162@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1472037609-4164-5-git-send-email-vijay.kilari@gmail.com>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 04:50:08PM +0530, vijay.kilari at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>
>
> VGICv3 CPU interface registers are accessed using
> KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS ioctl. These registers are accessed
> as 64-bit. The cpu MPIDR value is passed along with register id.
> is used to identify the cpu for registers access.
>
> The version of VGIC v3 specification is define here
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2016-July/445611.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 15 ++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
> include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h | 4 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c | 29 +++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c | 4 +-
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 6 +
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 6 +
> 8 files changed, 271 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 94ea676..b13c944 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -182,14 +182,14 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_ ## n ## _MASK)
>
> #define __ARM64_SYS_REG(op0,op1,crn,crm,op2) \
> - (KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG | \
> - ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op0, OP0) | \
> + (ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op0, OP0) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op1, OP1) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(crn, CRN) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(crm, CRM) | \
> ARM64_SYS_REG_SHIFT_MASK(op2, OP2))
eh, no, please don't modify an exported userspace API header file in
this way.
If you want to reuse this, then add a new define for the sysreg field
generators and call that from __ARM64_SYS_REG() and from
KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG.
>
> -#define ARM64_SYS_REG(...) (__ARM64_SYS_REG(__VA_ARGS__) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64)
> +#define ARM64_SYS_REG(...) (__ARM64_SYS_REG(__VA_ARGS__) | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG)
>
> #define KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CTL ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 3, 1)
> #define KVM_REG_ARM_TIMER_CNT ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 3, 14, 3, 2)
> @@ -208,7 +208,16 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS 3
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL 4
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS 5
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS 6
> +
> #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT 0
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP0_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP1_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRN_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_CRM_MASK | \
> + KVM_REG_ARM64_SYSREG_OP2_MASK)
we didn't need this for the existing userspace to kernel sysreg
interface, why do we need this now, and even need to export it to
userspace?
> +#define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2) \
> + __ARM64_SYS_REG(op0, op1, crn, crm, op2)
>
> /* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
> #define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL 0
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> index 695eb3c..dafbd0e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
> @@ -31,5 +31,6 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-its.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
> kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> index 56b0b7e..164463b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h
> @@ -383,6 +383,10 @@
>
> #define ICH_VMCR_CTLR_SHIFT 0
> #define ICH_VMCR_CTLR_MASK (0x21f << ICH_VMCR_CTLR_SHIFT)
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT 0
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG0 (1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT)
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT 1
> +#define ICH_VMCR_ENG1 (1 << ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT)
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT 18
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR1_MASK (7 << ICH_VMCR_BPR1_SHIFT)
> #define ICH_VMCR_BPR0_SHIFT 21
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> index 06f0158..74e5c38 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-kvm-device.c
> @@ -500,6 +500,15 @@ static int vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(struct kvm_device *dev,
> if (!is_write)
> *reg = tmp32;
> break;
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 regid;
> +
> + regid = (attr->attr & KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_SYSREG_MASK) |
> + KVM_REG_SIZE_U64;
I think the simpler way, which is analogous to what the other sysreg
access functions do, it so simply define a mask fort the 'instr' field
(0xffff) and let the lookup function worry about the individual fields.
> + ret = vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(vcpu, is_write,
> + regid, reg);
> + break;
> + }
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> break;
> @@ -533,6 +542,15 @@ static int vgic_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> reg = tmp32;
> return vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, true);
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, true);
> + }
> }
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> @@ -560,6 +578,16 @@ static int vgic_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> ret = put_user(tmp32, uaddr);
> return ret;
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 __user *uaddr = (u64 __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + ret = vgic_attr_regs_access_v3(dev, attr, ®, false);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + ret = put_user(reg, uaddr);
> + return ret;
nit: you can just do 'return put_user(reg, uaddr);'
> + }
> }
>
> return -ENXIO;
> @@ -578,6 +606,7 @@ static int vgic_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_device *dev,
> break;
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_DIST_REGS:
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_REDIST_REGS:
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS:
> return vgic_v3_has_attr_regs(dev, attr);
> case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_NR_IRQS:
> return 0;
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> index cd37159..4a35eb8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v2.c
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static void vgic_mmio_write_sgipends(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> }
> }
>
> -static void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> +void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> {
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_set_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> vgic_v3_set_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> }
>
> -static void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> +void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr)
> {
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_get_vmcr(vcpu, vmcr);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index c2df103..61abea0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> #include "vgic.h"
> #include "vgic-mmio.h"
> +#include "sys_regs.h"
>
> /* extract @num bytes at @offset bytes offset in data */
> unsigned long extract_bytes(unsigned long data, unsigned int offset,
> @@ -598,6 +599,11 @@ int vgic_v3_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> nr_regions = ARRAY_SIZE(vgic_v3_rdbase_registers);
> break;
> }
> + case KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CPU_SYSREGS: {
> + u64 reg;
> +
> + return vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(vcpu, 0, cpuid, ®);
> + }
> default:
> return -ENXIO;
> }
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..581d053
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-sys-reg-v3.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
> +#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm.h>
> +#include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> +#include <kvm/iodev.h>
> +#include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_arm.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
> +
> +#include "vgic.h"
> +#include "vgic-mmio.h"
> +#include "sys_regs.h"
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ctlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.ctlr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.ctlr;
> + }
> +
really? Have you looked at the spec and implementation of this or did
you just copy the v2 code?
The ICH_VMCR_EL2 register field mappings are not identical to the ctlr
mappings. I think this causes some rework for much of this patch, so
I'll have a look at the next revision.
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_pmr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.pmr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.pmr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_bpr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.bpr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.bpr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_bpr1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_vmcr vmcr;
> +
> + vgic_get_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vmcr.abpr = (u32)p->regval;
> + vgic_set_vmcr(vcpu, &vmcr);
> + } else {
> + p->regval = vmcr.abpr;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_grpen0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr &= ~ICH_VMCR_ENG0;
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr |= (p->regval << ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT) &
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG0;
> + } else {
> + p->regval = (vgicv3->vgic_vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG0) >>
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG0_SHIFT;
> + }
so for example, why shouldn't these go through the vgic_set/get_vmcr
wrappers?
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_grpen1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write) {
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr &= ~ICH_VMCR_ENG1;
> + vgicv3->vgic_vmcr |= (p->regval << ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT) &
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG1;
> + } else {
> + p->regval = (vgicv3->vgic_vmcr & ICH_VMCR_ENG1) >>
> + ICH_VMCR_ENG1_SHIFT;
> + }
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ap0r(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> + u8 idx = r->Op2 & 3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vgicv3->vgic_ap0r[idx] = p->regval;
> + else
> + p->regval = vgicv3->vgic_ap0r[idx];
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool access_gic_ap1r(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct vgic_v3_cpu_if *vgicv3 = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu.vgic_v3;
> + u8 idx = r->Op2 & 3;
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + vgicv3->vgic_ap1r[idx] = p->regval;
> + else
> + p->regval = vgicv3->vgic_ap1r[idx];
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct sys_reg_desc gic_v3_icc_reg_descs[] = {
> + /* ICC_PMR_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(4), CRm(6), Op2(0), access_gic_pmr },
> + /* ICC_BPR0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr0 },
> + /* ICC_AP0R0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(4), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(5), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R2_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(6), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP0R3_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(8), Op2(7), access_gic_ap0r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(0), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(1), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R2_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(2), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_AP1R3_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(9), Op2(3), access_gic_ap1r },
> + /* ICC_BPR1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(3), access_gic_bpr1 },
> + /* ICC_CTLR_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(4), access_gic_ctlr },
> + /* ICC_IGRPEN0_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(6), access_gic_grpen0 },
> + /* ICC_GRPEN1_EL1 */
> + { Op0(3), Op1(0), CRn(12), CRm(12), Op2(7), access_gic_grpen1 },
Do we need to allow userspace to at least read ICC_SRE_EL1?
Should we verify that the DIB and FDB fields of that register are
written as the system understands them (clear, WI)?
> +};
> +
> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg)
> +{
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> +
> + params.regval = le64_to_cpu(*reg);
> + params.is_write = is_write;
> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
> + params.is_32bit = false;
> +
> + return find_reg_by_id(id, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs)) ?
> + 0 : -ENXIO;
this looks terrible, please rewrite without the ternary operator.
> +}
> +
> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg)
> +{
> + struct sys_reg_params params;
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r;
> +
> + if (is_write)
> + params.regval = le64_to_cpu(*reg);
why do we need this conversion here?
> + params.is_write = is_write;
> + params.is_aarch32 = false;
> + params.is_32bit = false;
> +
> + r = find_reg_by_id(id, ¶ms, gic_v3_icc_reg_descs,
> + ARRAY_SIZE(gic_v3_icc_reg_descs));
> + if (!r)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> + if (!r->access(vcpu, ¶ms, r))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (!is_write)
> + *reg = cpu_to_le64(params.regval);
same question as above
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> index 14e4ce5..20eab36c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ int vgic_v3_dist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> int offset, u32 *val);
> int vgic_v3_redist_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> int offset, u32 *val);
> +int vgic_v3_cpu_sysregs_uaccess(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write,
> + u64 id, u64 *val);
> +int vgic_v3_has_cpu_sysregs_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_write, u64 id,
> + u64 *reg);
> #else
> static inline void vgic_v3_process_maintenance(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> @@ -169,6 +173,8 @@ static inline int vgic_its_inject_msi(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_msi *msi)
> #endif
>
> int kvm_register_vgic_device(unsigned long type);
> +void vgic_set_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> +void vgic_get_vmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vgic_vmcr *vmcr);
> int vgic_lazy_init(struct kvm *kvm);
> int vgic_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-30 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-24 11:20 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement API for vGICv3 live migration vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement support for userspace access vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-30 10:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 10:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 10:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 10:49 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 10:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 10:50 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Add distributor and redistributor access vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-30 12:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 12:31 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 13:47 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 14:14 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 14:14 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 17:09 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 17:09 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Introduce find_reg_by_id() vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-30 12:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 12:41 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement VGICv3 CPU interface access vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-30 13:45 ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2016-08-30 13:45 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 13:48 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 14:13 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 14:13 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 19:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 19:19 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-07 13:49 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-07 13:49 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-07 14:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-07 14:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 17:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 17:10 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-24 11:20 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] arm/arm64: vgic-new: Implement KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_LEVEL_INFO ioctl vijay.kilari
2016-08-24 11:20 ` vijay.kilari at gmail.com
2016-08-30 14:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 14:00 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 14:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-08-30 14:07 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 14:12 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 14:12 ` Vijay Kilari
2016-09-06 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
2016-09-06 19:20 ` Christoffer Dall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160830134514.GJ10162@cbox \
--to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
--cc=Vijaya.Kumar@cavium.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=vijay.kilari@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.