All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: SF Markus Elfring
	<elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 13:47:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905134741.GJ32579@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dc4cd4-eb71-50e5-8f10-c38c8ec6f6c0-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 25 Aug, at 11:40:45AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 677e29e..311022a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
>  	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
>  
>  	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> -	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
>  		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);

Thanks, applied with Paolo's Reviewed-by.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org>
To: SF Markus Elfring
	<elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:47:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905134741.GJ32579@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dc4cd4-eb71-50e5-8f10-c38c8ec6f6c0-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>

On Thu, 25 Aug, at 11:40:45AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 677e29e..311022a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
>  	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
>  
>  	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> -	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
>  		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);

Thanks, applied with Paolo's Reviewed-by.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog()
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:47:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905134741.GJ32579@codeblueprint.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6dc4cd4-eb71-50e5-8f10-c38c8ec6f6c0@users.sourceforge.net>

On Thu, 25 Aug, at 11:40:45AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 11:34:03 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus reuse the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of a data type by a pointer dereference
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> index 677e29e..311022a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/platform/efi/efi_64.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ pgd_t * __init efi_call_phys_prolog(void)
>  	early_code_mapping_set_exec(1);
>  
>  	n_pgds = DIV_ROUND_UP((max_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT), PGDIR_SIZE);
> -	save_pgd = kmalloc(n_pgds * sizeof(pgd_t), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	save_pgd = kmalloc_array(n_pgds, sizeof(*save_pgd), GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	for (pgd = 0; pgd < n_pgds; pgd++) {
>  		save_pgd[pgd] = *pgd_offset_k(pgd * PGDIR_SIZE);

Thanks, applied with Paolo's Reviewed-by.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 13:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-25  9:40 [PATCH] x86/efi: Use kmalloc_array() in efi_call_phys_prolog() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25  9:40 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-25 11:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-08-25 11:32   ` Paolo Bonzini
     [not found] ` <f6dc4cd4-eb71-50e5-8f10-c38c8ec6f6c0-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
2016-09-05 13:47   ` Matt Fleming [this message]
2016-09-05 13:47     ` Matt Fleming
2016-09-05 13:47     ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160905134741.GJ32579@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --to=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=elfring-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=julia.lawall-L2FTfq7BK8M@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pbonzini-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.