All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable common modules for power management
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:20:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908102035.GD1493@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5498297.rN0szKFv4p@wuerfel>

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:33:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, September 1, 2016 12:51:09 PM CEST Leo Yan wrote:
> > Enable common modules for power management; one is to enable
> > CPUFREQ_DT driver; the driver is used by many platforms by passing OPP
> > table from device tree.
> > 
> > Also enables thermal related drivers. Firstly we need enable
> > configuration CPU_THERMAL for CPU cooling device driver, this will bind
> > thermal zone with CPU cooling device; and enable 'power allocator'
> > thermal governor.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > 
> 
> Looks good,
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Catalin and Will: I never know who should merge this kind of patch
> as we have a number of other arm64 defconfig patches going through
> arm-soc, but this patch is not really platform specific.
> 
> Do you want to pick it up in the arm64 tree or should we take
> this and others patches like it in general?

I'm perfectly happy with you taking this, but thanks for asking the
question. I think that, outside of the architectural bits, it makes
sense for arm-soc to manage config options that are requested by the
submaintainers. It also helps reduce defconfig churn. I typically wait
until -rc1 before making any .config changes, unless they're urgent
(e.g. systemd suddenly starts needing some options enabled in order to
boot), so if you queue this for the merge window then we should be good.

Will

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@linaro.org>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable common modules for power management
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:20:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908102035.GD1493@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5498297.rN0szKFv4p@wuerfel>

Hi Arnd,

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 09:33:38AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday, September 1, 2016 12:51:09 PM CEST Leo Yan wrote:
> > Enable common modules for power management; one is to enable
> > CPUFREQ_DT driver; the driver is used by many platforms by passing OPP
> > table from device tree.
> > 
> > Also enables thermal related drivers. Firstly we need enable
> > configuration CPU_THERMAL for CPU cooling device driver, this will bind
> > thermal zone with CPU cooling device; and enable 'power allocator'
> > thermal governor.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> > 
> 
> Looks good,
> 
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> 
> Catalin and Will: I never know who should merge this kind of patch
> as we have a number of other arm64 defconfig patches going through
> arm-soc, but this patch is not really platform specific.
> 
> Do you want to pick it up in the arm64 tree or should we take
> this and others patches like it in general?

I'm perfectly happy with you taking this, but thanks for asking the
question. I think that, outside of the architectural bits, it makes
sense for arm-soc to manage config options that are requested by the
submaintainers. It also helps reduce defconfig churn. I typically wait
until -rc1 before making any .config changes, unless they're urgent
(e.g. systemd suddenly starts needing some options enabled in order to
boot), so if you queue this for the merge window then we should be good.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-08 10:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01  4:51 [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: enable common modules for power management Leo Yan
2016-09-01  4:51 ` Leo Yan
2016-09-01  5:03 ` Leo Yan
2016-09-01  5:03   ` Leo Yan
2016-09-01  7:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-01  7:33   ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-08 10:20   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2016-09-08 10:20     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-14 22:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-09-14 22:08       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160908102035.GD1493@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.