All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [writeback] 8bc4ad9498: INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 08:46:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160909004640.GA7334@yexl-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cace953-b5b9-4840-f3f2-b21bd4f30095@fb.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]

On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>>>
>>>>The command line was in the original email:
>>>>
>>>>$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
>>>>
>>>>And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
>>>>well, so that folks can reproduce.
>>>
>>>Yes we have a reproduce script internally, however need to polish it
>>>up and make it general usable by kernel developers.
>>>
>>>CC Philip. It'd be helpful to give more priority to the "lkp qemu"
>>>reproduce command.
>>>
>>>For the warning here, it does not depend on any initrd, I just
>>>confirmed this simple script can reproduce the problem.
>>
>>Yes, just confirmed that v4.8-rc5 doesn't have this warning, while kernel
>>for the updated commit (fa0e2cb1af765691fabd329f03cad563a0eebf18) on branch
>>wb-buf-throttle could reproduce it.
>
>Anyone willing to try the below patch?

The warning log is gone with this patch.

Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>index ef61bda76317..a7bb2e6bcaef 100644
>--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
>+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>@@ -3764,9 +3764,11 @@ static void check_blkcg_changed(struct
>cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio)
> 	struct cfq_data *cfqd = cic_to_cfqd(cic);
> 	struct cfq_queue *cfqq;
> 	uint64_t serial_nr;
>+	bool nonroot_cg;
>
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	serial_nr = bio_blkcg(bio)->css.serial_nr;
>+	nonroot_cg = bio_blkcg(bio) != &blkcg_root;
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
>
> 	/*
>@@ -3781,7 +3783,7 @@ static void check_blkcg_changed(struct
>cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio)
> 	 * do proper throttling of writes. Turn off wbt for that
> 	 * case.
> 	 */
>-	if (bio_blkcg(bio) != &blkcg_root) {
>+	if (nonroot_cg) {
> 		struct request_queue *q = cfqd->queue;
>
> 		if (q->rq_wb)
>
>-- 
>Jens Axboe
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	lkp@01.org, Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [writeback] 8bc4ad9498: INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:46:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160909004640.GA7334@yexl-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4cace953-b5b9-4840-f3f2-b21bd4f30095@fb.com>

On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>Hi Jens and Tejun,
>>>
>>>>The command line was in the original email:
>>>>
>>>>$ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M
>>>>
>>>>And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was a link to the image as
>>>>well, so that folks can reproduce.
>>>
>>>Yes we have a reproduce script internally, however need to polish it
>>>up and make it general usable by kernel developers.
>>>
>>>CC Philip. It'd be helpful to give more priority to the "lkp qemu"
>>>reproduce command.
>>>
>>>For the warning here, it does not depend on any initrd, I just
>>>confirmed this simple script can reproduce the problem.
>>
>>Yes, just confirmed that v4.8-rc5 doesn't have this warning, while kernel
>>for the updated commit (fa0e2cb1af765691fabd329f03cad563a0eebf18) on branch
>>wb-buf-throttle could reproduce it.
>
>Anyone willing to try the below patch?

The warning log is gone with this patch.

Tested-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>index ef61bda76317..a7bb2e6bcaef 100644
>--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
>+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
>@@ -3764,9 +3764,11 @@ static void check_blkcg_changed(struct
>cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio)
> 	struct cfq_data *cfqd = cic_to_cfqd(cic);
> 	struct cfq_queue *cfqq;
> 	uint64_t serial_nr;
>+	bool nonroot_cg;
>
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 	serial_nr = bio_blkcg(bio)->css.serial_nr;
>+	nonroot_cg = bio_blkcg(bio) != &blkcg_root;
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
>
> 	/*
>@@ -3781,7 +3783,7 @@ static void check_blkcg_changed(struct
>cfq_io_cq *cic, struct bio *bio)
> 	 * do proper throttling of writes. Turn off wbt for that
> 	 * case.
> 	 */
>-	if (bio_blkcg(bio) != &blkcg_root) {
>+	if (nonroot_cg) {
> 		struct request_queue *q = cfqd->queue;
>
> 		if (q->rq_wb)
>
>-- 
>Jens Axboe
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-09  0:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-01 10:21 [writeback] 8bc4ad9498: INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ] kernel test robot
2016-09-01 10:21 ` kernel test robot
2016-09-01 20:13 ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-01 20:13   ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-02 14:56   ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-02 14:56     ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-02 15:36     ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-02 15:36       ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-02 15:49       ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-02 15:49         ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-02 17:00         ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-02 17:00           ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-09-02 18:00           ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-02 18:00             ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-07 16:41 ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-07 16:41   ` Tejun Heo
2016-09-07 19:25   ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-07 19:25     ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-08  1:43     ` Fengguang Wu
2016-09-08  1:43       ` [LKP] " Fengguang Wu
2016-09-08  2:04       ` Ye Xiaolong
2016-09-08  2:04         ` [LKP] " Ye Xiaolong
2016-09-08 15:52         ` Jens Axboe
2016-09-08 15:52           ` [LKP] " Jens Axboe
2016-09-09  0:46           ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2016-09-09  0:46             ` Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160909004640.GA7334@yexl-desktop \
    --to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.