From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:46:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915004642.GL7243@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160908145146.20422-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On 09/08, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch set improves the slow clock controller driver.
>
> The first patch simply moves some code around to avoid having extern
> functions declared.
>
> The second patch adds support for the SCKC found on sama5d4 and later.
> It is notably missing the OSC32EN bit.
> The third and fourth patches make use of this new driver (DT ABI is not
> broken \o/)
>
> Finally, there is an optimization. Trying to find wether the slow
> oscillator is already stable to avoid waiting 1.2s twice in the boot
> process.
clk patches look ok. We'll need to move this to use clk_hw
registration based APIs some time, but that isn't critical to
handle now. Will you resend?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:46:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915004642.GL7243@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160908145146.20422-1-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
On 09/08, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch set improves the slow clock controller driver.
>
> The first patch simply moves some code around to avoid having extern
> functions declared.
>
> The second patch adds support for the SCKC found on sama5d4 and later.
> It is notably missing the OSC32EN bit.
> The third and fourth patches make use of this new driver (DT ABI is not
> broken \o/)
>
> Finally, there is an optimization. Trying to find wether the slow
> oscillator is already stable to avoid waiting 1.2s twice in the boot
> process.
clk patches look ok. We'll need to move this to use clk_hw
registration based APIs some time, but that isn't critical to
handle now. Will you resend?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-08 14:51 [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] clk: at91: move slow clock controller clocks to sckc.c Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] clk: at91: Add sama5d4 sckc support Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-09 10:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-09 10:52 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d4: use proper sckc compatible Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: use correct " Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] clk: at91: sckc: optimize boot time Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-08 14:51 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-09-15 0:46 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-09-15 0:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] AT91: sckc improvements Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915004642.GL7243@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.