All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: Factor out PAN enabling/disabling into separate uaccess_* macros
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915151045.GD9316@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473788797-10879-2-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Hi Catalin,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch moves the directly coded alternatives for turning PAN on/off
> into separate uaccess_{enable,disable} macros or functions. The asm
> macros take a few arguments which will be used in subsequent patches.
> 
> Note that any (unlikely) access that the compiler might generate between
> uaccess_enable() and uaccess_disable(), other than those explicitly
> specified by the user access code, will not be protected by PAN.

There's one missing include that I've noted below, along with a number
we can now drop. Otherwise, the important parts all look good to me.

With the includes fixed up:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

[...]

> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h       | 14 +++----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 10 ++---
>  arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S          |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S      |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S        |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S        |  8 ++--
>  7 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> index f2585cdd32c2..71dfa3b42313 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  
>  #define __futex_atomic_op(insn, ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg)		\
> +do {									\
> +	uaccess_enable();						\
>  	asm volatile(							\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN,		\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)					\
>  "	prfm	pstl1strm, %2\n"					\
>  "1:	ldxr	%w1, %2\n"						\
>  	insn "\n"							\
> @@ -44,11 +44,11 @@
>  "	.popsection\n"							\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)						\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 4b)						\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,		\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)					\
>  	: "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (oldval), "+Q" (*uaddr), "=&r" (tmp)	\
>  	: "r" (oparg), "Ir" (-EFAULT)					\
> -	: "memory")
> +	: "memory");							\
> +	uaccess_disable();						\
> +} while (0)

With the uaccess_{enable,disable}* macros, we can drop the includes for
<asm/alternative.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and <asm/sysreg.h> from
futex.h, as we no longer (directly) use anything from those.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index c47257c91b77..cc6c32d4dcc4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h

> @@ -321,4 +357,31 @@ extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
>  extern __must_check long strlen_user(const char __user *str);
>  extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);
>  
> +#else	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> +#include <asm/assembler.h>

We also need <asm/sysreg.h> for SET_PSTATE_PAN()

Given we use that and <asm/alternative.h> either way, should we pull
those above the #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__? I have no feeling either way.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> index 42ffdb54e162..7156e7bfcd89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> @@ -281,9 +281,9 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
>   * Error-checking SWP macros implemented using ldxr{b}/stxr{b}
>   */
>  #define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B)		\
> +do {								\
> +	uaccess_enable();					\
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(					\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN,	\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)				\
>  	"0:	ldxr"B"		%w2, [%3]\n"			\
>  	"1:	stxr"B"		%w0, %w1, [%3]\n"		\
>  	"	cbz		%w0, 2f\n"			\
> @@ -299,11 +299,11 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
>  	"	.popsection"					\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 4b)					\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)					\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,	\
> -		CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)				\
>  	: "=&r" (res), "+r" (data), "=&r" (temp)		\
>  	: "r" (addr), "i" (-EAGAIN), "i" (-EFAULT)		\
> -	: "memory")
> +	: "memory");						\
> +	uaccess_disable();					\
> +} while (0)

With this, we can drop the include of <asm/alternative.h>, though unlike
futex.h we need to keep <asm/cpufeature.h> and <asm/sysreg.h>.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> index 5d1cad3ce6d6..08b5f18ba604 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> @@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
>   */
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

As with futex.h, we can drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h>, as the uaccess_{enable,disable}* macros mean we no
longer use anything from those directly.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> index 0b90497d4424..6505ec81f1da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> index f7292dd08c84..9b04ff3ab610 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> @@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> index 7a7efe255034..8077e4f34d56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: Factor out PAN enabling/disabling into separate uaccess_* macros
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 16:10:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915151045.GD9316@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1473788797-10879-2-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>

Hi Catalin,

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch moves the directly coded alternatives for turning PAN on/off
> into separate uaccess_{enable,disable} macros or functions. The asm
> macros take a few arguments which will be used in subsequent patches.
> 
> Note that any (unlikely) access that the compiler might generate between
> uaccess_enable() and uaccess_disable(), other than those explicitly
> specified by the user access code, will not be protected by PAN.

There's one missing include that I've noted below, along with a number
we can now drop. Otherwise, the important parts all look good to me.

With the includes fixed up:

Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

[...]

> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h       | 14 +++----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h     | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c | 10 ++---
>  arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S          |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S      |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S        |  8 ++--
>  arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S        |  8 ++--
>  7 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> index f2585cdd32c2..71dfa3b42313 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h
> @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
>  
>  #define __futex_atomic_op(insn, ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg)		\
> +do {									\
> +	uaccess_enable();						\
>  	asm volatile(							\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN,		\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)					\
>  "	prfm	pstl1strm, %2\n"					\
>  "1:	ldxr	%w1, %2\n"						\
>  	insn "\n"							\
> @@ -44,11 +44,11 @@
>  "	.popsection\n"							\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)						\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(2b, 4b)						\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,		\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)					\
>  	: "=&r" (ret), "=&r" (oldval), "+Q" (*uaddr), "=&r" (tmp)	\
>  	: "r" (oparg), "Ir" (-EFAULT)					\
> -	: "memory")
> +	: "memory");							\
> +	uaccess_disable();						\
> +} while (0)

With the uaccess_{enable,disable}* macros, we can drop the includes for
<asm/alternative.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and <asm/sysreg.h> from
futex.h, as we no longer (directly) use anything from those.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index c47257c91b77..cc6c32d4dcc4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h

> @@ -321,4 +357,31 @@ extern long strncpy_from_user(char *dest, const char __user *src, long count);
>  extern __must_check long strlen_user(const char __user *str);
>  extern __must_check long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long n);
>  
> +#else	/* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> +#include <asm/assembler.h>

We also need <asm/sysreg.h> for SET_PSTATE_PAN()

Given we use that and <asm/alternative.h> either way, should we pull
those above the #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__? I have no feeling either way.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> index 42ffdb54e162..7156e7bfcd89 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/armv8_deprecated.c
> @@ -281,9 +281,9 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
>   * Error-checking SWP macros implemented using ldxr{b}/stxr{b}
>   */
>  #define __user_swpX_asm(data, addr, res, temp, B)		\
> +do {								\
> +	uaccess_enable();					\
>  	__asm__ __volatile__(					\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(0), ARM64_HAS_PAN,	\
> -		    CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)				\
>  	"0:	ldxr"B"		%w2, [%3]\n"			\
>  	"1:	stxr"B"		%w0, %w1, [%3]\n"		\
>  	"	cbz		%w0, 2f\n"			\
> @@ -299,11 +299,11 @@ static void __init register_insn_emulation_sysctl(struct ctl_table *table)
>  	"	.popsection"					\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(0b, 4b)					\
>  	_ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 4b)					\
> -	ALTERNATIVE("nop", SET_PSTATE_PAN(1), ARM64_HAS_PAN,	\
> -		CONFIG_ARM64_PAN)				\
>  	: "=&r" (res), "+r" (data), "=&r" (temp)		\
>  	: "r" (addr), "i" (-EAGAIN), "i" (-EFAULT)		\
> -	: "memory")
> +	: "memory");						\
> +	uaccess_disable();					\
> +} while (0)

With this, we can drop the include of <asm/alternative.h>, though unlike
futex.h we need to keep <asm/cpufeature.h> and <asm/sysreg.h>.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> index 5d1cad3ce6d6..08b5f18ba604 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S
> @@ -17,10 +17,10 @@
>   */
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

As with futex.h, we can drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h>, as the uaccess_{enable,disable}* macros mean we no
longer use anything from those directly.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> index 0b90497d4424..6505ec81f1da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_from_user.S
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> index f7292dd08c84..9b04ff3ab610 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_in_user.S
> @@ -18,11 +18,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

[...]

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> index 7a7efe255034..8077e4f34d56 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/copy_to_user.S
> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/linkage.h>
>  
> -#include <asm/alternative.h>
>  #include <asm/assembler.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>  #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> +#include <asm/uaccess.h>

Likewise, we can also drop <asm/assembler.h>, <asm/cpufeature.h>, and
<asm/sysreg.h> here.

Thanks,
Mark.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-15 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-13 17:46 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: Factor out PAN enabling/disabling into separate uaccess_* macros Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 15:10   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2016-09-15 15:10     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64: Factor out TTBR0_EL1 post-update workaround into a specific asm macro Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 15:19   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 15:19     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable,enable} functionality based on TTBR0_EL1 Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable, enable} " Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 20:45   ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64: Introduce uaccess_{disable,enable} " Kees Cook
2016-09-13 20:45     ` Kees Cook
2016-09-14  8:52     ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-14  8:52       ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 16:27       ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-09-14 16:27         ` Kees Cook
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: Disable TTBR0_EL1 during normal kernel execution Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-14 16:45   ` [kernel-hardening] " Will Deacon
2016-09-14 16:45     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 5/7] arm64: Handle faults caused by inadvertent user access with PAN enabled Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-16 11:33   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-16 11:33     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-16 15:55     ` [kernel-hardening] " Catalin Marinas
2016-09-16 15:55       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: xen: Enable user access before a privcmd hvc call Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: Enable CONFIG_ARM64_SW_TTBR0_PAN Catalin Marinas
2016-09-13 17:46   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-14 10:13 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64: Privileged Access Never using TTBR0_EL1 switching Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:13   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:27   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:27     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:30     ` [kernel-hardening] " Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:30       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-14 10:36       ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:36         ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:48         ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 10:48           ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-14 20:54 ` [kernel-hardening] " David Brown
2016-09-14 20:54   ` David Brown
2016-09-15  9:52   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15  9:52     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-09-15 16:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 16:20   ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 16:41   ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2016-09-15 16:41     ` Mark Rutland
2016-09-29 22:44   ` [kernel-hardening] " Sami Tolvanen
2016-09-29 22:44     ` Sami Tolvanen
2016-09-30 18:42     ` Kees Cook
2016-09-30 18:42       ` Kees Cook
2016-10-27 14:54       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-27 14:54         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-27 21:23         ` Kees Cook
2016-10-27 21:23           ` Kees Cook
2016-10-14 21:44 ` Kees Cook
2016-10-14 21:44   ` Kees Cook
2016-10-15 14:35   ` [kernel-hardening] " Catalin Marinas
2016-10-15 14:35     ` Catalin Marinas
2016-10-16  2:04     ` [kernel-hardening] " Kees Cook
2016-10-16  2:04       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160915151045.GD9316@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.