All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	imammedo@redhat.com, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] monitor: fix crash for platforms without a CPU 0
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:17:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922001712.GL1809@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160921121402.GI3233@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2273 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:14:02AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:29:26PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Now that we allow CPU hot unplug on a few platforms, we can end up in a
> > situation where we don't have a CPU with index 0.  Or at least we could,
> > if we didn't have code to explicitly prohibit unplug of CPU 0.
> > 
> > Longer term we want to allow CPU 0 unplug, this patch is an early step in
> > allowing this, by removing an assumption in the monitor code that CPU 0
> > always exists.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> > [dwg: Rewrote commit message to better explain background]
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  monitor.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Anyone want to volunteer to take this through their tree?  If not, I
> > can take it through my ppc tree.
> > 
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index 8bb8bbf..83c4edf 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ int monitor_set_cpu(int cpu_index)
> >  CPUState *mon_get_cpu(void)
> >  {
> >      if (!cur_mon->mon_cpu) {
> > -        monitor_set_cpu(0);
> > +        monitor_set_cpu(first_cpu->cpu_index);
> 
> So, we are replacing the "CPU 0 always exists" assumption with a
> "first_cpu is always non-NULL" assumption.

Well, we're replacing "CPU 0 is always present" assumption with "At
least one CPU is always present", which is a strictly weaker
constraint.

> But considering that the first_cpu assumption already exists
> elsewhere and those cases can be found easily using grep, I think
> this is OK. So:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> 
> BTW, it is also possible to crash QEMU by unplugging the current
> monitor CPU;

Ah... good point.

>   (qemu) device_add qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=2,core-id=0,thread-id=0,id=mycpu
>   (qemu) cpu 2
>   (qemu) device_del mycpu
>   (qemu) info registers
>   qemu:qemu_cpu_kick_thread: No such process
>   $ 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com,
	imammedo@redhat.com, "Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] monitor: fix crash for platforms without a CPU 0
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:17:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160922001712.GL1809@umbus.fritz.box> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160921121402.GI3233@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2273 bytes --]

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:14:02AM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 03:29:26PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > Now that we allow CPU hot unplug on a few platforms, we can end up in a
> > situation where we don't have a CPU with index 0.  Or at least we could,
> > if we didn't have code to explicitly prohibit unplug of CPU 0.
> > 
> > Longer term we want to allow CPU 0 unplug, this patch is an early step in
> > allowing this, by removing an assumption in the monitor code that CPU 0
> > always exists.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
> > [dwg: Rewrote commit message to better explain background]
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  monitor.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Anyone want to volunteer to take this through their tree?  If not, I
> > can take it through my ppc tree.
> > 
> > diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
> > index 8bb8bbf..83c4edf 100644
> > --- a/monitor.c
> > +++ b/monitor.c
> > @@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@ int monitor_set_cpu(int cpu_index)
> >  CPUState *mon_get_cpu(void)
> >  {
> >      if (!cur_mon->mon_cpu) {
> > -        monitor_set_cpu(0);
> > +        monitor_set_cpu(first_cpu->cpu_index);
> 
> So, we are replacing the "CPU 0 always exists" assumption with a
> "first_cpu is always non-NULL" assumption.

Well, we're replacing "CPU 0 is always present" assumption with "At
least one CPU is always present", which is a strictly weaker
constraint.

> But considering that the first_cpu assumption already exists
> elsewhere and those cases can be found easily using grep, I think
> this is OK. So:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> 
> BTW, it is also possible to crash QEMU by unplugging the current
> monitor CPU;

Ah... good point.

>   (qemu) device_add qemu64-x86_64-cpu,socket-id=2,core-id=0,thread-id=0,id=mycpu
>   (qemu) cpu 2
>   (qemu) device_del mycpu
>   (qemu) info registers
>   qemu:qemu_cpu_kick_thread: No such process
>   $ 
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-22  0:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-21  5:29 [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] monitor: fix crash for platforms without a CPU 0 David Gibson
2016-09-21  5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson
2016-09-21 11:36 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Igor Mammedov
2016-09-21 11:36   ` Igor Mammedov
2016-09-21 12:14 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-09-21 12:14   ` [Qemu-devel] " Eduardo Habkost
2016-09-22  0:17   ` David Gibson [this message]
2016-09-22  0:17     ` David Gibson
2016-09-21 14:50 ` [Qemu-trivial] " Luiz Capitulino
2016-09-21 14:50   ` [Qemu-devel] " Luiz Capitulino
2016-09-22  0:17   ` [Qemu-trivial] " David Gibson
2016-09-22  0:17     ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160922001712.GL1809@umbus.fritz.box \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.