All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:27:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923092706.GN30248@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923084341.GA32342@kroah.com>

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:41AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:32:58PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:33:24PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > Kgdb support on arm64 was merged in v3.15, but from its first appearance,
> > > > "signle step" has never worked well.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch fixes all the error cases I found so far.
> > > > The original patch[1] was splitted into three pieces, ones for each case.
> > > > patch#1, #2 should be applied to all the version, v3.15 and later.
> > > > pathc#3 only for v3.16 and later.
> > > 
> > > As this is not a regression (i.e. it has never worked), why is this
> > > something for stable releases?
> > 
> > Because, I think, that is a bug.
> > The author seems to have believed that it worked.
> > Please see:
> >   commit 44679a4f
> >   Author: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
> >   Date:   Tue Jan 28 11:20:19 2014 +0000
> > 
> >       arm64: KGDB: Add step debugging support
> 
> Yes, but again, it didn't work, so this would be a new feature.

Yes, but again, it's a bug of kgdb on arm64 which is supposed
to have been available since v3.15.

> One
> that obviously people aren't using in the stable kernels, otherwise they
> would have noticed in the past 2 years about it being broken :)

Totally agree. That is also why I've left this patch untouched
for a long time. But recently a guy asked me about kgdb, saying that
single step didn't work on his platform. He re-discovered this bug.
He doesn't use stable kernels, but Linaro's LSK (v4.4), though :)

> Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for the requirements
> of a stable kernel patch.  I don't think this series meets those rules.

Please re-think about merging this patch.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	jason.wessel@windriver.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:27:07 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160923092706.GN30248@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160923084341.GA32342@kroah.com>

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:43:41AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 05:32:58PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:16:18AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 04:33:24PM +0900, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > Kgdb support on arm64 was merged in v3.15, but from its first appearance,
> > > > "signle step" has never worked well.
> > > > 
> > > > This patch fixes all the error cases I found so far.
> > > > The original patch[1] was splitted into three pieces, ones for each case.
> > > > patch#1, #2 should be applied to all the version, v3.15 and later.
> > > > pathc#3 only for v3.16 and later.
> > > 
> > > As this is not a regression (i.e. it has never worked), why is this
> > > something for stable releases?
> > 
> > Because, I think, that is a bug.
> > The author seems to have believed that it worked.
> > Please see:
> >   commit 44679a4f
> >   Author: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>
> >   Date:   Tue Jan 28 11:20:19 2014 +0000
> > 
> >       arm64: KGDB: Add step debugging support
> 
> Yes, but again, it didn't work, so this would be a new feature.

Yes, but again, it's a bug of kgdb on arm64 which is supposed
to have been available since v3.15.

> One
> that obviously people aren't using in the stable kernels, otherwise they
> would have noticed in the past 2 years about it being broken :)

Totally agree. That is also why I've left this patch untouched
for a long time. But recently a guy asked me about kgdb, saying that
single step didn't work on his platform. He re-discovered this bug.
He doesn't use stable kernels, but Linaro's LSK (v4.4), though :)

> Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for the requirements
> of a stable kernel patch.  I don't think this series meets those rules.

Please re-think about merging this patch.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-23  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-23  7:33 [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] arm64: kgdb: prevent kgdb from being invoked recursively AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23 10:02   ` Will Deacon
2016-09-23 10:02     ` Will Deacon
2016-09-23  7:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: kgdb: disable interrupts while a software step is enabled AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  7:33   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  8:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping Greg KH
2016-09-23  8:16   ` Greg KH
2016-09-23  8:32   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  8:32     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  8:43     ` Greg KH
2016-09-23  8:43       ` Greg KH
2016-09-23  9:27       ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2016-09-23  9:27         ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-23  9:23         ` Greg KH
2016-09-23  9:23           ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160923092706.GN30248@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.