From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: bcm2835: Clamp the PLL's requested rate to the hardware limits.
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:18:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929231838.GC940@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160929022334.25537-1-eric@anholt.net>
On 09/28, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Fixes setting low-resolution video modes on HDMI. Now the PLLH_PIX
> divider adjusts itself until the PLLH is within bounds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> ---
> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> index 7a7970865c2d..fedc88908e61 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> @@ -499,8 +499,13 @@ static long bcm2835_pll_rate_from_divisors(unsigned long parent_rate,
> static long bcm2835_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *parent_rate)
> {
> + struct bcm2835_pll *pll = container_of(hw, struct bcm2835_pll, hw);
> + const struct bcm2835_pll_data *data = pll->data;
> u32 ndiv, fdiv;
>
> + rate = max(data->min_rate, rate);
> + rate = min(data->max_rate, rate);
clamp() instead?
I wonder if it's worthwhile to do this through clk rate
constraints instead. That's another topic though so this patch is
fine for now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: bcm2835: Clamp the PLL's requested rate to the hardware limits.
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:18:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160929231838.GC940@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160929022334.25537-1-eric@anholt.net>
On 09/28, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Fixes setting low-resolution video modes on HDMI. Now the PLLH_PIX
> divider adjusts itself until the PLLH is within bounds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
> ---
> drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> index 7a7970865c2d..fedc88908e61 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/bcm/clk-bcm2835.c
> @@ -499,8 +499,13 @@ static long bcm2835_pll_rate_from_divisors(unsigned long parent_rate,
> static long bcm2835_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> unsigned long *parent_rate)
> {
> + struct bcm2835_pll *pll = container_of(hw, struct bcm2835_pll, hw);
> + const struct bcm2835_pll_data *data = pll->data;
> u32 ndiv, fdiv;
>
> + rate = max(data->min_rate, rate);
> + rate = min(data->max_rate, rate);
clamp() instead?
I wonder if it's worthwhile to do this through clk rate
constraints instead. That's another topic though so this patch is
fine for now.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-29 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-29 2:23 [PATCH] clk: bcm2835: Clamp the PLL's requested rate to the hardware limits Eric Anholt
2016-09-29 2:23 ` Eric Anholt
2016-09-29 23:18 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2016-09-29 23:18 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160929231838.GC940@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.