From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2016 08:17:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161009151748.GA29102@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006214751.GU27872@dastard>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:47:51AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Except that it's DAX, and in 4.7-rc1 that used shared locking at the
> XFS level and never took exclusive locks.
>
> *However*, the DAX IO path locking in XFS has changed in 4.9-rc1 to
> match the buffered IO single writer POSIX semantics - the test is a
> bad test based on the fact it exercised a path that is under heavy
> development and so can't be used as a regression test across
> multiple kernels.
That being said - I wonder if we should allow the shared lock on DAX
files IFF the user is specifying O_DIRECT in the open mode..
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 15:17:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161009151748.GA29102@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161006214751.GU27872@dastard>
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 08:47:51AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Except that it's DAX, and in 4.7-rc1 that used shared locking at the
> XFS level and never took exclusive locks.
>
> *However*, the DAX IO path locking in XFS has changed in 4.9-rc1 to
> match the buffered IO single writer POSIX semantics - the test is a
> bad test based on the fact it exercised a path that is under heavy
> development and so can't be used as a regression test across
> multiple kernels.
That being said - I wonder if we should allow the shared lock on DAX
files IFF the user is specifying O_DIRECT in the open mode..
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-09 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-18 21:11 [RFC PATCH-tip v4 00/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reader optimistic spinning Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-04 19:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-04 19:06 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-04 21:28 ` Jason Low
2016-10-04 21:28 ` Jason Low
2016-10-05 12:19 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-05 12:19 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-05 12:19 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-05 15:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-05 15:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-05 15:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-06 5:47 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 5:47 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 19:30 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-06 19:30 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-06 19:30 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-10 5:39 ` [PATCH] locking/osq: Provide proper lock/unlock and relaxed flavors Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-10 5:39 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 19:31 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 01/10] locking/osq: Make lock/unlock proper acquire/release barrier Jason Low
2016-10-06 19:31 ` Jason Low
2016-10-06 19:31 ` Jason Low
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 02/10] locking/rwsem: Stop active read lock ASAP Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-06 18:17 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 18:17 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-06 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-06 22:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-06 22:51 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-07 21:45 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-07 21:45 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-07 21:45 ` Waiman Long
2016-10-09 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-10-09 15:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 6:07 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-10 6:07 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-10 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-10 9:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-11 21:06 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-11 21:06 ` Dave Chinner
2016-10-16 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-10-16 5:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 03/10] locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return a tri-state value Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 04/10] locking/rwsem: Enable count-based spinning on reader Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 05/10] locking/rwsem: move down rwsem_down_read_failed function Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 06/10] locking/rwsem: Move common rwsem macros to asm-generic/rwsem_types.h Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 07/10] locking/rwsem: Change RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS for better disambiguation Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-19 5:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-19 5:57 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-19 16:21 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-19 16:21 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-19 16:21 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-22 2:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-22 2:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 08/10] locking/rwsem: Enable spinning readers Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 09/10] locking/rwsem: Enable reactivation of reader spinning Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold Waiman Long
2016-08-18 21:11 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-24 1:46 ` [lkp] [locking/rwsem] INFO: rcu_preempt detected stalls on CPUs/tasks kernel test robot
2016-08-24 1:46 ` kernel test robot
2016-08-24 1:46 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2016-08-24 4:00 ` [RFC PATCH-tip v4 10/10] locking/rwsem: Add a boot parameter to reader spinning threshold Davidlohr Bueso
2016-08-24 4:00 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-08-24 18:39 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-24 18:39 ` Waiman Long
2016-08-24 18:39 ` Waiman Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161009151748.GA29102@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.