From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: remove the old ttl expires policy
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 21:19:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161010211958.GA2945@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db5df5806c3c0b7c37ab9039a906664a33c74563.1475898016.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
> the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
> compatible with the old one for users.
>
> This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
> are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
> sctp_check_abandoned.
>
> Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
> difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 1 -
> net/sctp/chunk.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
> net/sctp/output.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 11c3bf2..61732e9 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
> /* Did the messenge fail to send? */
> int send_error;
> u8 send_failed:1,
> - can_abandon:1, /* can chunks from this message can be abandoned. */
> can_delay; /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> index 7a1cdf4..615f0dd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
> atomic_set(&msg->refcnt, 1);
> msg->send_failed = 0;
> msg->send_error = 0;
> - msg->can_abandon = 0;
> msg->can_delay = 1;
> msg->expires_at = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
> @@ -182,20 +181,11 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> /* Note: Calculate this outside of the loop, so that all fragments
> * have the same expiration.
> */
> - if (sinfo->sinfo_timetolive) {
> - /* sinfo_timetolive is in milliseconds */
> + if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable && sinfo->sinfo_timetolive &&
> + (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags) ||
> + !SCTP_PR_POLICY(sinfo->sinfo_flags)))
> msg->expires_at = jiffies +
> msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
> - msg->can_abandon = 1;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: msg:%p expires_at:%ld jiffies:%ld\n", __func__,
> - msg, msg->expires_at, jiffies);
> - }
> -
> - if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
> - SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags))
> - msg->expires_at > - jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
>
> /* This is the biggest possible DATA chunk that can fit into
> * the packet
> @@ -354,18 +344,8 @@ errout:
> /* Check whether this message has expired. */
> int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> {
> - if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable ||
> - !SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags)) {
> - struct sctp_datamsg *msg = chunk->msg;
> -
> - if (!msg->can_abandon)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (time_after(jiffies, msg->expires_at))
> - return 1;
> -
> + if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> return 0;
> - }
>
> if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> @@ -378,6 +358,10 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
> chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
> return 1;
> + } else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> + chunk->msg->expires_at &&
> + time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> + return 1;
> }
> /* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 2a5c189..f0af831 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -865,9 +865,6 @@ static void sctp_packet_append_data(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> rwnd = 0;
>
> asoc->peer.rwnd = rwnd;
> - /* Has been accepted for transmission. */
> - if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> - chunk->msg->can_abandon = 0;
> sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
> sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
To: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] sctp: remove the old ttl expires policy
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 18:19:58 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161010211958.GA2945@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <db5df5806c3c0b7c37ab9039a906664a33c74563.1475898016.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The prsctp polices include ttl expires policy already, we should remove
> the old ttl expires codes, and just adjust the new polices' codes to be
> compatible with the old one for users.
>
> This patch is to remove all the old expires codes, and if prsctp polices
> are not set, it will still set msg's expires_at and check the expires in
> sctp_check_abandoned.
>
> Note that asoc->prsctp_enable is set by default, so users can't feel any
> difference even if they use the old expires api in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/net/sctp/structs.h | 1 -
> net/sctp/chunk.c | 32 ++++++++------------------------
> net/sctp/output.c | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index 11c3bf2..61732e9 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -530,7 +530,6 @@ struct sctp_datamsg {
> /* Did the messenge fail to send? */
> int send_error;
> u8 send_failed:1,
> - can_abandon:1, /* can chunks from this message can be abandoned. */
> can_delay; /* should this message be Nagle delayed */
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/chunk.c b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> index 7a1cdf4..615f0dd 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/chunk.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/chunk.c
> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ static void sctp_datamsg_init(struct sctp_datamsg *msg)
> atomic_set(&msg->refcnt, 1);
> msg->send_failed = 0;
> msg->send_error = 0;
> - msg->can_abandon = 0;
> msg->can_delay = 1;
> msg->expires_at = 0;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&msg->chunks);
> @@ -182,20 +181,11 @@ struct sctp_datamsg *sctp_datamsg_from_user(struct sctp_association *asoc,
> /* Note: Calculate this outside of the loop, so that all fragments
> * have the same expiration.
> */
> - if (sinfo->sinfo_timetolive) {
> - /* sinfo_timetolive is in milliseconds */
> + if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable && sinfo->sinfo_timetolive &&
> + (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags) ||
> + !SCTP_PR_POLICY(sinfo->sinfo_flags)))
> msg->expires_at = jiffies +
> msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
> - msg->can_abandon = 1;
> -
> - pr_debug("%s: msg:%p expires_at:%ld jiffies:%ld\n", __func__,
> - msg, msg->expires_at, jiffies);
> - }
> -
> - if (asoc->peer.prsctp_capable &&
> - SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(sinfo->sinfo_flags))
> - msg->expires_at =
> - jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(sinfo->sinfo_timetolive);
>
> /* This is the biggest possible DATA chunk that can fit into
> * the packet
> @@ -354,18 +344,8 @@ errout:
> /* Check whether this message has expired. */
> int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> {
> - if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable ||
> - !SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags)) {
> - struct sctp_datamsg *msg = chunk->msg;
> -
> - if (!msg->can_abandon)
> - return 0;
> -
> - if (time_after(jiffies, msg->expires_at))
> - return 1;
> -
> + if (!chunk->asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> return 0;
> - }
>
> if (SCTP_PR_TTL_ENABLED(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> @@ -378,6 +358,10 @@ int sctp_chunk_abandoned(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
> chunk->sent_count > chunk->sinfo.sinfo_timetolive) {
> chunk->asoc->abandoned_sent[SCTP_PR_INDEX(RTX)]++;
> return 1;
> + } else if (!SCTP_PR_POLICY(chunk->sinfo.sinfo_flags) &&
> + chunk->msg->expires_at &&
> + time_after(jiffies, chunk->msg->expires_at)) {
> + return 1;
> }
> /* PRIO policy is processed by sendmsg, not here */
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/output.c b/net/sctp/output.c
> index 2a5c189..f0af831 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/output.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/output.c
> @@ -865,9 +865,6 @@ static void sctp_packet_append_data(struct sctp_packet *packet,
> rwnd = 0;
>
> asoc->peer.rwnd = rwnd;
> - /* Has been accepted for transmission. */
> - if (!asoc->peer.prsctp_capable)
> - chunk->msg->can_abandon = 0;
> sctp_chunk_assign_tsn(chunk);
> sctp_chunk_assign_ssn(chunk);
> }
> --
> 2.1.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sctp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-10 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-08 3:40 [PATCH net-next] sctp: remove the old ttl expires policy Xin Long
2016-10-08 3:40 ` Xin Long
2016-10-10 21:19 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner [this message]
2016-10-10 21:19 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-10-13 13:44 ` David Miller
2016-10-13 13:44 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161010211958.GA2945@localhost.localdomain \
--to=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.