All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:15:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012171548.GA98211@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1825a12-726f-4d79-b15b-3614d92d6897@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:14:42PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> On 2016/10/12 1:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
> > 
> > Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
> > operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
> 
> This is because we do not record any nids which has been allocated to node
> blocks, otherwise we will recored the status of nid in the cache and also it can
> be hitted during lookup.
> 
> In original patches, free_nid_list is split to two separate lists: free_nid_list
> and alloc_nid_list, __lookup_free_nid_list looks like just search the first one,
> so in order to avoid misunderstanding, I proposal this change.
> 
> Anyway, what about using __{lookup,insert_to,remove_from}_nid_list instead?

Then, how about this one?

>From 4f4b48de34ffaf94baa2065bcd5d44566f8d25b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:09:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: clean up free nid list operations

This patch cleans up to use consistent free nid list ops.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 54d1c49..3d2e259 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1698,25 +1698,26 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 	return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
 }
 
-static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
-						struct free_nid *i)
-{
-	radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
-}
-
-static void __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+static int __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool new)
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 
+	if (new) {
+		int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list == FREE_NID_LIST ? i->state != NID_NEW :
 						i->state != NID_ALLOC);
 	nm_i->nid_cnt[list]++;
 	list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->nid_list[list]);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool reuse)
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 
@@ -1724,6 +1725,8 @@ static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 						i->state != NID_ALLOC);
 	nm_i->nid_cnt[list]--;
 	list_del(&i->list);
+	if (!reuse)
+		radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
 }
 
 static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
@@ -1731,6 +1734,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 	struct free_nid *i;
 	struct nat_entry *ne;
+	int err;
 
 	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
 		return -1;
@@ -1757,15 +1761,13 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-	if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
-		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-		radix_tree_preload_end();
+	err = __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
+	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
+	radix_tree_preload_end();
+	if (err) {
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-	radix_tree_preload_end();
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -1778,8 +1780,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		need_free = true;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1899,9 +1900,9 @@ retry:
 					struct free_nid, list);
 		*nid = i->nid;
 
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
 		i->state = NID_ALLOC;
-		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
+		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 		return true;
 	}
@@ -1923,8 +1924,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
-	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-	__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 
 	kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1946,14 +1946,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
 
-	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-
 	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 		need_free = true;
 	} else {
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, true);
 		i->state = NID_NEW;
-		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 				nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
 			break;
 
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
-
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		nr_shrink--;
 	}
@@ -2369,8 +2366,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->nid_list[FREE_NID_LIST],
 									list) {
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-- 
2.8.3


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most 
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
To: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:15:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161012171548.GA98211@jaegeuk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1825a12-726f-4d79-b15b-3614d92d6897@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 11:14:42PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
> 
> On 2016/10/12 1:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> > 
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:31:32PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Rename free nid cache operation for readability, no functionality change.
> > 
> > Well, I don't think this can be a *cache*, since there is no cache-related
> > operations such as reordering by cache hit, whereas it is more likely to
> 
> This is because we do not record any nids which has been allocated to node
> blocks, otherwise we will recored the status of nid in the cache and also it can
> be hitted during lookup.
> 
> In original patches, free_nid_list is split to two separate lists: free_nid_list
> and alloc_nid_list, __lookup_free_nid_list looks like just search the first one,
> so in order to avoid misunderstanding, I proposal this change.
> 
> Anyway, what about using __{lookup,insert_to,remove_from}_nid_list instead?

Then, how about this one?

>From 4f4b48de34ffaf94baa2065bcd5d44566f8d25b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:09:59 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: clean up free nid list operations

This patch cleans up to use consistent free nid list ops.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index 54d1c49..3d2e259 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1698,25 +1698,26 @@ static struct free_nid *__lookup_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 	return radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->free_nid_root, n);
 }
 
-static void __del_from_free_nid_list(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
-						struct free_nid *i)
-{
-	radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
-}
-
-static void __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+static int __insert_nid_to_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
+			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool new)
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 
+	if (new) {
+		int err = radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, list == FREE_NID_LIST ? i->state != NID_NEW :
 						i->state != NID_ALLOC);
 	nm_i->nid_cnt[list]++;
 	list_add_tail(&i->list, &nm_i->nid_list[list]);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
-					struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list)
+			struct free_nid *i, enum nid_list list, bool reuse)
 {
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 
@@ -1724,6 +1725,8 @@ static void __remove_nid_from_list(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
 						i->state != NID_ALLOC);
 	nm_i->nid_cnt[list]--;
 	list_del(&i->list);
+	if (!reuse)
+		radix_tree_delete(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid);
 }
 
 static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
@@ -1731,6 +1734,7 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
 	struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i = NM_I(sbi);
 	struct free_nid *i;
 	struct nat_entry *ne;
+	int err;
 
 	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS))
 		return -1;
@@ -1757,15 +1761,13 @@ static int add_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid, bool build)
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-	if (radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->free_nid_root, i->nid, i)) {
-		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-		radix_tree_preload_end();
+	err = __insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
+	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
+	radix_tree_preload_end();
+	if (err) {
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		return 0;
 	}
-	__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-	radix_tree_preload_end();
 	return 1;
 }
 
@@ -1778,8 +1780,7 @@ static void remove_free_nid(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	if (i && i->state == NID_NEW) {
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		need_free = true;
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
@@ -1899,9 +1900,9 @@ retry:
 					struct free_nid, list);
 		*nid = i->nid;
 
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, true);
 		i->state = NID_ALLOC;
-		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
+		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 		return true;
 	}
@@ -1923,8 +1924,7 @@ void alloc_nid_done(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
-	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-	__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 
 	kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
@@ -1946,14 +1946,13 @@ void alloc_nid_failed(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t nid)
 	i = __lookup_free_nid_list(nm_i, nid);
 	f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !i);
 
-	__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST);
-
 	if (!available_free_memory(sbi, FREE_NIDS)) {
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, false);
 		need_free = true;
 	} else {
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, ALLOC_NID_LIST, true);
 		i->state = NID_NEW;
-		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
+		__insert_nid_to_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 
@@ -1980,9 +1979,7 @@ int try_to_free_nids(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int nr_shrink)
 				nm_i->nid_cnt[FREE_NID_LIST] <= MAX_FREE_NIDS)
 			break;
 
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
-
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		nr_shrink--;
 	}
@@ -2369,8 +2366,7 @@ void destroy_node_manager(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
 	spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(i, next_i, &nm_i->nid_list[FREE_NID_LIST],
 									list) {
-		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST);
-		__del_from_free_nid_list(nm_i, i);
+		__remove_nid_from_list(sbi, i, FREE_NID_LIST, false);
 		spin_unlock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
 		kmem_cache_free(free_nid_slab, i);
 		spin_lock(&nm_i->nid_list_lock);
-- 
2.8.3

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-12 17:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-11 14:31 [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] f2fs: clean up nid list operation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31   ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] f2fs: rename free nid cache operation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31   ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:19   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 17:19     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12 15:14     ` Chao Yu
2016-10-12 15:14       ` Chao Yu
2016-10-12 17:15       ` Jaegeuk Kim [this message]
2016-10-12 17:15         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-13 10:26         ` Chao Yu
2016-10-13 10:26           ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] f2fs: show pending allocated nids count in debugfs Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:20   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 17:20     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] f2fs: exclude free nids building and allocation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31   ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:25   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 17:25     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] f2fs: don't interrupt free nids building during nid allocation Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] f2fs: avoid casted negative value as shrink count Chao Yu
2016-10-11 14:31   ` Chao Yu
2016-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] f2fs: split free nid list Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-11 17:09   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2016-10-12  1:14   ` Chao Yu
2016-10-12  1:14     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161012171548.GA98211@jaegeuk \
    --to=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.